1 / 18

To What Extent Can Biogenic SOA be Controlled?

To What Extent Can Biogenic SOA be Controlled?. Annmarie Carlton, Rob Pinder, Prakash Bhave, George Pouliot CMAS – Chapel HIll, NC. Important Findings. CMAQ Simulations indicate anthropogenic pollution enhances predicted biogenic SOA concentrations in the U.S. substantially ~ 50%

rachel
Download Presentation

To What Extent Can Biogenic SOA be Controlled?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. To What Extent Can Biogenic SOA be Controlled? Annmarie Carlton, Rob Pinder, Prakash Bhave, George Pouliot CMAS – Chapel HIll, NC

  2. Important Findings CMAQ Simulations indicate anthropogenic pollution enhances predicted biogenic SOA concentrations in the U.S. substantially ~ 50% • Effects are largest in eastern U.S. • POC and NOx are largest individual pollutant classes contributing to overall biogenic SOA

  3. MOTIVATION Non-fossil (biogenic) carbon is a dominant component of atmospheric organic aerosol Substantial portion of PM2.5 carbon is ‘modern’ even in urban areas(Lewis et al., 2004; Szidat et al., 2006; Bench et al., 2007; Gelencsér, et al., 2007) Tracer-based ambient SOA ‘measurements’ dominated by contributions from biogenic hydrocarbons(Edney et al., 2003; Kleindienst et al., 2007) Ambient WSOC, AMS OOA spectra and other indicators of SOA correlate strongly with tracers of anthropogenic pollution(Weber et al., 2007; de Gouw et al., 2005; Goldstein et al., 2009) If anthropogenic pollution is enhancing biogenic SOA how can this contribution be quantified?

  4. SOAA POA POA SOAB SOAA SOAB Anthropogenic/Biogenic Interactions in SOA Formation SVOC SVOC SVOC SVOC anthropogenic VOCs biogenic VOCs oxidants oxidants controllable emissions (e.g., anthropogenic VOCs) non-controllable (e.g., biogenic VOCs) H+ effects not shown

  5. Estimating Anthropogenic Contribution to “Biogenic” SOA • Difficult to directly measure in the atmosphere • O3, OH ambient measurements – no insight as to whether the precursor was anthropogenic or biogenic • PM mass - can make estimates only about organic precursors with detailed chemical analysis • Can investigate large scale trends and relationships with an atmospheric model (CMAQ) by manipulating emissions

  6. accumulation mode organic PM cloud water monoterpene ∙OH,O3 AORGC ATRP1, ATRP2 SV_TRP1 SV_TRP2 O3P, NO3 ∙OH dissolution AOLGB sesquiterpenes ASQT ∙OH,O3, or NO3 glyoxal methylglyoxal POA SV_SQT AISO1, AISO2 AISO3 H+ ∙OH isoprene SV_ISO1, SV_ISO2 VOCs O3,O3P, or NO3 EMISSIONS Pathways do not contribute to SOA EMISSIONS EMISSIONS EMISSIONS Non-volatile

  7. Modeling experiment • Simulation of August 15 - September 4, 2003 • Continental US • Time period has high biogenic contribution to SOA • Emissions: controllable versus not controllable Not Controllable Controllable Everything else: Power plants Vehicles Agricultural burning Area sources Wildfire Prescribed burning VOCs from plants / trees Soil NOx Lightning NOx

  8. Percent of emitted species from controllable and uncontrollable sources controllable sources – gray uncontrollable sources - white Carlton et al., ES&T (2010)

  9. Biogenic SOA at the Surface (<~34 m): 18 day average Base CMAQ simulation all emissions Fraction of biogenic SOA from controllable pollution non-controllable emissions = biogenic emissions + wildfires + prescribed burns fraction Carlton et al., ES&T (2010) Results averaged from Aug. 18th – Sep. 4th, 2003

  10. Difference in predicted biogenic SOA mass concentrations Maxima for time period Average for time period On Average ~ 1 ug/m3 of Biogenic SOA in SE is from controllable sources • Additional simulations to estimate effects and contributions of individual species • POC, NOx, VOC, SO2, NH3

  11. To control biogenic SOA – what should regulators focus on? • What emitted species are most important? • What locations are most impacted? • Group the anthropogenic emissions into • VOC: Volatile Organic Carbon • POC: Primary Organic Carbon Particles • NOx • Remove one of these species at a time • Calculate change in biogenic SOA

  12. Regional Influence of Controllable Emissions on “Biogenic” SOA Controllable POC Controllable NOx Controllable SO2 Surface (<~34 m) Concentration; 18 day average

  13. Change in population-weighted AQ metrics

  14. Cloud SOA 2003 Monthly-Averaged CMAQ Results at RTP

  15. Cloud SOA Precursors glyoxal methylglyoxal 2003 Monthly-Averaged CMAQ Results at RTP

  16. Cloud SOA Precursors ∙OH SOA formation is photochemistry

  17. Conclusions • Used CMAQ to estimate fraction of biogenic SOA that is controllable. • In the Eastern US, ~50% of the biogenic SOA can be controlled by reducing anthropogenic emissions • To reduce concentrations of biogenic SOA, focus on • primary organic carbonaceous particles (POC) and NOx • SO2 impacts biogenic SOA in the southeastern US • Cloud-produced SOA exhibits seasonal cycle similar to ∙OH and biogenic VOCs

  18. Acknowledgements • Sergey Napelenok • Marc Houyoux • Alice Gilliland • Rohit Mathur • Golam Sarwar • Ed Edney, Tad Kleindist, John Offenburg, Michael Lewandowski • Charles Chang & Ryan Cleary

More Related