60 likes | 167 Views
For overlapped regions, we have two RP’s (eg. EVU & EHI or EVU & EHO) and we therefore have 4 equations to solve for 4 unknowns, including the vertices (x 0 ,y 0 ). [run: 10181085]. Getting rid of EVU (and only EVD left with EHI/EHO), there is only one peak.
E N D
For overlapped regions, we have two RP’s (eg. EVU & EHI or EVU & EHO) and we therefore have 4 equations to solve for 4 unknowns, including the vertices (x0,y0). [run: 10181085] • Getting rid of EVU (and only EVD left with EHI/EHO), there is only one peak. • And I roughly know from the collinearity plot that we need some +ve additions to make the large alignment (of EVU-WVD) smaller.
By trials or errors (or called scanning) with different values, adding +1.25 mm would merge 2 peaks into 1. • vertices of x from DST for the same run • The only “imperfection” is that the average vertex positions found above is not exactly what the average vertex positions from the DST found by other STAR detectors.
Trigger efficiencies (like last week): • in each EVU-WVD event and in the overlapped regions, I check whether whether EHI/WHI or EHO/WHO is fired in the respective overlapped region. • Note that the (online) trigger conditions are like : • EHX1/2: 100 TAC 1700 and ADC 5 and • EHX = EHX1 or EHX2 • where X = I or O • Inefficiencies: • EHI: (2.86 0.08)% WHI: (3.60 0.088)% EHO: (3.79 0.08)% WHO: (0.33 0.028)%
ADC’s for EVU-WVD in the overlapped (EVU-EHI and EVU-EHO) region run 10183028 :
TAC’s for EVU-WVD in the overlapped (EVU-EHI and EVU-EHO) region run 10183028 :
Where does the asymmetries come from ? Eg. for –t > 0.0295 (with -1.4 -0.4). y (m) x (m)