60 likes | 203 Views
Plans for Near-Real-Time AIRS L2 Profile Assimilation. Shih-Hung Chou and Brad Zavodsky. AIRS Specifications. Aboard Aqua polar orbiter Early afternoon equator crossing 2378 spectral channels 3.7 – 15.4 μ m (650 – 2675 cm -1 ) 3 x 3 footprints (50 km spatial resolution)
E N D
Plans for Near-Real-Time AIRS L2 Profile Assimilation Shih-Hung Chou and Brad Zavodsky
AIRS Specifications • Aboard Aqua polar orbiter • Early afternoon equator crossing • 2378 spectral channels • 3.7 – 15.4 μm (650 – 2675 cm-1) • 3 x 3 footprints (50 km spatial resolution) • AMSU allows for retrievals in both clear and cloudy scenes • Version 4.0 Error Estimates (Tobin et al. 2006) • 0.6-1.0K over ocean (± 50o latitude) • 0.9-1.3K global ocean and land (in 1 km layers) • < 15% RH (in 2 km layers)
AIRS Data Quality Indicators • Quality indicators (QIs) in V5: • pressure for each sounding indicating level of valid data • level-by-level error estimates for each T and q profile • Improved retrieval algorithm • More data are assimilated • QIs allow for the maximum amount of quality data to be assimilated • assimilating a larger volume of higher quality data should produce an analysis that provides better initial conditions for the WRF AIRS V5 PBest from JPL Focus Day
Near-Real-Time WRF/AIRS SimulationsInitialized at 00Z – 12 km (Using15 nodes) wrf_prep 40-km NAM (00Z) wrf_real init/brdy wrf_run to AIRS time 7-h fcst Assimilate AIRS data (ARPS) 15 min 8 min 30 min ~1.5 h AIRS data wrf_run (autopost) 41-h fcst Products to web 2 h 10 m/case 30 min • Summary: • Total run time with 1 AIRS case: ~ 4 h 40 m • Each additional case ~ 2 h 10 m • QPF and RAOB verifications will run when obs are available
Timeline for Near-Real-Time WRF/AIRS SimulationsInitialized at 00Z – 12 km (Using15 nodes) 5:20Z 6:20Z 9:00Z 10:30Z 12:40Z 14:50Z 15:20Z WRF WRF Start WRF CNTL run AIRS run-1 AIRS run-2 Web products 7-h fcst 7-h fcst ADAS 7:00Z AIRS obs AIRS on line
Products to Web Daily Posting • Surface and Pressure-Level Maps: T, q, h, and V • Difference Fields: T, q, h, and V Delayed Posting • Verification Statistics: RAOB and NAM analysis bias and RMSE • Qualitative Precipitation Forecast: Stage IV precipitation bias score and equitable threat score Website:NASA GHCC AIRS Assimilation Case Study