1 / 16

Alexi Mestvirishvili University of Iowa Department Physics and Astronomy

Status of the qq  qq h study. Alexi Mestvirishvili University of Iowa Department Physics and Astronomy. Comments and question direct to Alexi.Mestvirishvili@cern.ch. Events generation by PYTHIA 6.1.52 Detector response simulation by CMSJET. f i f j  f i f j h

rae
Download Presentation

Alexi Mestvirishvili University of Iowa Department Physics and Astronomy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of the qq  qqh study Alexi Mestvirishvili University of Iowa Department Physics and Astronomy Comments and question direct to Alexi.Mestvirishvili@cern.ch

  2. Events generation by PYTHIA 6.1.52 Detector response simulation by CMSJET

  3. fi fj fi fjh (Higgs production via WW fusion) Higgs mass was chosen to be 300 GeV Higgs decay hZZ Z decay Z(1) e+e- Z (2)    Two forward jets are generated after the quarks from incoming protons radiates W ‘s Signal events

  4. Background processes considered so far 2)WW ZZ 3) ZZ Z(1) e+e- Z (2)    4) Z+jet fi fi Z0 f g  f Z0 Z e+e- N number of events in each set 100000

  5. Cross-sections and luminosities (  given by PYTHIA) Tab.1

  6. Jets selection 1) All reconstructed jets must be well within CMS aperture -5 <  < 5 2) Forward jets selection 2.5 < || < 5 3) Jet transverse energy Et > 20GeV 4) At least one tagged forward jet satisfying the criteria above

  7. 1) Presence of two isolated lepton required (one electron, one positron) 2) ||(lepton) < 2.4 3) Et(lepton) > 20GeV 4) Invariant mass of two leptons must be in vicinity of Z mass --- |M(e+e-) – M(Z)| < 5GeV leptons(e+e- )selection

  8. Jets multiplicity Two jet events are dominant in the signal sample N of jets N of jets NOT NORMALIZED N of jets N of jets

  9. Forward jet multiplicity Most of the events has one forward jet in all samples N of jets N of jets NOT NORMALIZED N of jets N of jets

  10. Missing transverse energyE missdistribution t NOT NORMALIZED Z + jet events are almost completely killed by the E miss cut t Emiss>50GeV was required t Emiss (GeV) t

  11. at least 1 forward tag jet two forward tag jets each in opposite hemispheres qqh 28.63% 6.1% WW ZZ 20.05% 4.5% ZZ 1.04% 0.016% Z+jets 10-3% 0% Efficiency Tab.2

  12. Number of events Nev = ·  · L(lhc · year) where –efficiency for particular process L(lhc · year) – one year LHC running integrated luminosity  –particular process cross-section

  13. at least 1 forward tag jet at least 1 forward tag jet 2 forward tag jets each in opposite hemispheres 2 forward tag jets each in opposite hemispheres qqh qqh 41 25 6 9 WWZZ WWZZ 0.28 0.46 0.1 0.06 ZZ ZZ 30 51 0.5 0.8 Z+jets Z+jets 4048 2433 0 0 Number of events Assuming one year running at low luminosity L = 60fb-1 Assuming one year running at high luminosity L = 100fb-1

  14. t t Z Each t decays to W b with consecutive W decay to e. Z decays to e+e-. two neutrinos from W generates large missing transverse energy. Charged leptons: A) two e from W are out of tracker acceptance, two e from Z are in one electron/positron from Z and one positron/electron from one of the W are in the tracker acceptance others out Jets: C) bothb jets from t decay are forward i.e. could not be tagged as a b jets. one b central, another forward and one forward jet is generated by ISR or FSR. both b jets central, two forward jets are generated by ISR or FSR Bkg sources to be considered in near future

  15. Bkg sources to be considered in near future A) + C)—worst case scenario, final state configuration exactly as in signal events. Significantly will affect the signal to background ratio. A) + D) and A) + E)— b jet tagging will suppress this kind of configuration, but assuming b tagging efficiency is expected to be 60%-70% will contribute to the signal to background ratio. B) + C), B) + D) — in addition to the b jet tagging needs to investigate or dilepton mass distribution, in order to determine the B) + E) distribution exact shape to use side band subtraction method.

  16. Bkg sources to be considered in near future • t t • Each t decays to W b with consecutive W decay to e. two neutrinos from W • generates large missing transverse energy. • Charged leptons stays central and they are detectable. • Jets: • both b jets from t decay are forward i.e. could not be tagged as a b jets • one b central, another forward and one forward jet is generated by ISR or FSR. • both b jets central, two forward jets are generated by ISR or FSR • Needs to investigate dilepton mass distribution, in order • to determine the distribution exact shape to use side band subtraction method.

More Related