240 likes | 337 Views
Are We Eating Our Young?. Horizontal Violence and Interpreters. Who I am and where this came from. What do you already know about horizontal violence?. Objectives for today. Know what horizontal violence is and why it happens. Be able to recognize horizontal violence in interpreting.
E N D
Are We Eating Our Young? Horizontal Violence and Interpreters
Objectives for today • Know what horizontal violence is and why it happens. • Be able to recognize horizontal violence in interpreting. • Know some strategies for how to reduce horizontal violence in our field.
Evolution of the research question • Why do we eat our young? • Wait, DO we eat our young? • A. Is there evidence of intergenerational communication conflict in among interpreters in Ohio? • B. If so, what is the nature of it?
Methodology • Preliminary survey to address first question • Analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively • Interviews • Analyzed qualitatively; main focus
What the literature says about horizontal violence • Terminology • Commonalities among different terms • Specific behaviors • Effects on victims • Importance
Causes of horizontal violence • Oppression • Mainly-female fields • Fields whose values are subjugated • Witnessing oppression frequently
Causes of horizontal violence • Subjugated professional status • Helping fields • Limited professional identity
Causes of horizontal violence • Constrained decision latitude • Powerlessness • Nursing’s JDR framework and interpreting’s DCS framework
Causes of horizontal violence • Professional hierarchies • “Hostility is the natural outcome of working in a hierarchical system where there is little control and scarce resources” (Bartholomew 2006, p.70).
Causes of horizontal violence • Role stress • Rigid expectations of role • Expectation of femininity • Ideal of invisibility
Factors that make it worse • The stress of HV depletes resources needed to deal with it • Transition shock new professionals experience
Factors that keep it going • It’s a culture • We love the status quo • Induction of new members • Hostility toward change • Dues-paying
Factors that keep it going • The role of new professionals • Denial • Intermittent reinforcement • Unwillingness to be observed • Experiences in schools and training programs
What I found in the survey • Both groups were more comfortable with their own group • Comments that indicated it was more than generational
Examples of HV in the interviews • Horizontal violence happened to all 4 interviewees • Defensiveness • Common knowledge of “those kind of stories” • Mention of “gatekeepers” • Hesitancy to be labeled “new” • Note about methodology- “new” and “experienced” for this study
Examples of HV in the interviews • All 4 interviewees had participated in HV • Important note: This is not something they were aware of, nor are they bad people. It would be wrong to otherize them. • Negative comments about other interpreters • Denial of the problem • Language about training programs • Overconfidence and dues-paying
What can help • Critical/feminist pedagogy • Assertiveness • Recognizing and naming the phenomenon • JDR, DC-S • Psychological capital • Supervision and mentorship
Discussion • What about the unique realities of interpreting? • We almost always work between people • We have unusual power dynamics with our consumers • We work with oppression regularly
For more information or discussion: • http://digitalcommons.wou.edu/theses/1/ • Emilyki.ott@gmail.com