240 likes | 360 Views
THE STIMULATED EMISSION PUMPING AND DISPERSED FLUORESCENCE SPECTRA OF ACETYLENE ARE NOT INTRINSICALLY UN ASSIGNABLE. IT’S WHAT YOU PLUCK! A TUTORIAL ON INTRAMOLECULAR DYNAMICS. FROM A QUANTUM MECHANICAL H eff TO A CLASSICAL MECHANICAL H eff : VIEWS OF INTRAMOLECULAR DYNAMICS.
E N D
THE STIMULATED EMISSION PUMPING AND DISPERSED FLUORESCENCE SPECTRA OF ACETYLENE ARE NOT INTRINSICALLY UNASSIGNABLE IT’S WHAT YOU PLUCK! A TUTORIAL ON INTRAMOLECULAR DYNAMICS FROM A QUANTUM MECHANICAL Heff TO A CLASSICAL MECHANICAL Heff: VIEWS OF INTRAMOLECULAR DYNAMICS
LOST IN A SEA OF FIT PARAMETERS 4 ATOMS, 3N–6=6 MODES, IGNORE SYMMETRY CUBIC: 6[iii] + 30[ijj] + 20[ijk] = 56 [total] QUARTIC: 6[iiii] +30[ijjj] + 15[iijj] + 60[iijk] + 15[ijkl] = 126 [total] total [83] BY PERTURBATION THEORY V(Q)E(V)
PERTURBATION THEORY AND “RESONANCE” DEFINE “ZERO-ORDER” BASIS SET ( 0 ) Y ( 0 ) = ( 0 ) Y ( 0 ) H E n n n ( 1 ) H kn Y = Y ( 0 ) + y ( 0 ) n n k ( 0 ) ( 0 ) - E E k n n k 2 ( 1 ) H kn ( 0 ) ( 1 ) = + + E E H n n nn ( 0 ) ( 0 ) - E E k n n k (1) H OTHERWISE “RESONANCE” kn > VALID IF 1 (0) (0) - E E n k MUST DIVIDE BASIS STATES INTO QUASI-DEGENERATE GROUPS VAN VLECK TRANSFORM AND DIAGONALIZE EACH †
IS RESONANCE BAD NEWS? CAN’T USE NONDEGENERATE PERTURBATION THEORY CAN’T DERIVE SIMPLE ENERGY LEVEL FORMULAS “x-k RELATIONSHIPS” A FEW kijk AND kijkl ARE SINGLED OUT FOR SPECIAL TREATMENT • * NOT BECAUSE OF THEIR MAGNITUDE • * BECAUSE THEY ARE LARGE WRT AN ENERGY DENOMINATOR • “RESONANCE” • * RESONANCES ARE USUALLY SYSTEMATIC • * RESONANCES HAVE PROMINENT EFFECTS ON THE SPECTRUM AND THE EARLY TIME DYNAMICS • MOST NON-RESONANT kijk and kijkl CAN BE IGNORED!
v v P=2v +v E 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 (3/2+ 0 )w (3/2+ 1 )w 0 1 1 1 0 2 (3/2+ 1 )w (3/2+ 2 )w 0 2 2 1 1 3 (3/2+ 3 )w (3/2+ 3 )w 0 3 3 2 0 4 (3/2+ 4 )w (3/2+ 4 )w 1 2 4 0 4 4 (3/2+ 4 )w POLYADS EXAMPLE: RESONANCE COUPLING TERM SELECTION RULE: v1 = ±1, v2 = ±2, 0 SCALING: NEAR DEGENERATE GROUPS OF BASIS STATES P=4 POLYAD (20) (12) (04) ALL POLYADS EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF wAND K P = 10 POLYAD? HINT: 6 BASIS STATES
BRIGHT AND DARK STATES ELECTRONIC TRANSITION: FRANCK-CONDON FACTORS qv¢,v CHANGE IN GEOMETRY Let MODE 1 BE F–C DARK, MODE 2 F-C BRIGHT EIGENSTATES: P = 4 POLYAD ONLY 1 BRIGHT STATE IN EACH w1 22 POLYAD
Acetylene Polyad Structure Polyad Quantum Numbers Ns = v1 + v2 + v3 “quanta of stretching excitation” Nres = 5v1 + 3v2 + 5v3 +v4 + v5 “approximate energy” = 4 + 5 “total vibrational angular momentum” v1 = sym. CH stretch v2 = CC stretch v3 = anti-sym. CH stretch v4 = trans bend v5 = cis bend 4/5 = vib. ang. momentum [Fried and Ezra, JCP 86 (1987) 6270; Kellman and Chen, JCP 95 (1991) 8671] H = = bright state ) 0,v2,0,v4,00 0 †
NOW FOR THE REAL WORLD ENERGY LEVEL PATTERNS FROM DIFFERENT POLYADS OVERLAP INTER-POLYAD MIXING? CAN OVERLAPPING POLYADS BE DISENTANGLED? HIGH RESOLUTION: SEP DUMP PUMP LOW RESOLUTION: DF FLUORESCE PUMP
INTRINSICALLY UNASSIGNABLE? E VIBRATIONAL LEVELS EXIST? J(J+1) OR SCATTER PLOT? STATISTICAL TESTS LEVEL SPACING DISTRIBUTION INTENSITY DISTRIBUTION QUANTUM CHAOS ! ? OR NOT ? !
Dispersed Fluorescence Spectroscopy from S1 State of Acetylene H C C H H :C C H H H C C n3 n3 n2 = CC stretch n3 = trans bend n3 42,000 cm–1 n3 S1 ** origin 16,000 cm–1 pump S0 n2 = CC stretch n4 = trans bend ** FRANCK-CONDON PLUCK • Dispersed fluorescence spectra recorded from J¢=1 levels of 5 S1-State vibrational levels. • Dispersed emission recorded on an intensified Charge Coupled Device (ICCD) at 16 cm–1 and 7 cm–1 resolution. • Frequency calibration (good to ~3 cm–1) accomplished using Hg, Ne, Kr, Xe, Th, Fe, and Ar frequency standards. • Intensity calibration (good to ~20%) accomplished using Standard of Spectral Irradiance (quartz tungsten lamp).
How do we make sense of these spectra? Internal Energy (cm–1) Our Approach: Numerical Pattern Recognition Based on two (good) approximations: 1. The acetylene effective Hamiltonian is block diagonal (polyads) 2. There is one bright state per polyad. JCP 107 8349 (1997)XCC
Selected Eigenstates at Evib ≈ 14,500 cm–1 “local bend” ??? “counter-rotation”
ASSIGNABILITY WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO “ASSIGN” A SPECTRUM ? RIGOROUSLY CONSERVED QUANTITIES [H,A] = 0 BORING APPROXIMATELY CONSERVED QUANTITIES [H(0),A] = 0PATTERNS [H(1),A] 0DYNAMICS SEVERAL CHOICES OF PARTITIONINGS OF H INTO H(0) + H(1) RISKY EARLY TIME DYNAMICS “THE PLUCK” MECHANISM