1 / 39

Supporting Inclusion of Young Children with Disabilities - Webinar Series

Join our webinar series to learn about national initiatives, educational environments data, survey results on preschool inclusion, and key resources supporting the inclusion of young children with disabilities.

Download Presentation

Supporting Inclusion of Young Children with Disabilities - Webinar Series

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Webinar Series1Supporting the Inclusion of Young Children with DisabilitiesSession 1: Opportunities, Initiatives and Key ResourcesOctober 28th 2014 Debbie Cate Shelley deFosset Barbara J. Smith Kathy Whaley

  2. Objectives Share information about: • National initiatives supporting inclusion, • National educational environments data, • National survey results on preschool inclusion, and • Resources and materials supporting inclusion, including future webinars.

  3. National Initiatives and Opportunities in Support of Inclusion • Federal Public Awareness Campaign with a Position Paper on Inclusion • DEC Special Initiative on Inclusion • RTT-ELC and Pre-School Development Grants • ECTA/ ELC TA Partnership

  4. State practices integrating IDEA programs into TQRIS/QRIS • Strengthening agency partnerships for a coordinated approach to serving children with disabilities The Inclusion Forum provided an opportunityfor discussion and problem solving:

  5. Priorities Selected by Participants • Defining and measuring quality indicators for Part B/619 and Part C • Incorporating incentives for school-based early childhood programs in TQRIS/QRIS • Incorporating incentives for other early childhood programs in TQRIS/QRIS

  6. Priorities, continued • Providing professional development and technical assistance to support inclusive practice • Developing cross-sector professional development to ensure staff are adequately prepared • Using data to inform decisions (at all levels) about professional development, resources, administration, policies, and program practices.

  7. SPP APR Indicator 6 Measurement: • Percent of children aged 3 - 5 with IEPs attending a regular early childhood program and receiving the majority of special education and related services in the regular early childhood program. • Percent of children aged 3 - 5 with IEPs attending a separate special education class, separate school or residential facility.

  8. Indicator Results 2012-2013 Data reported for IDEA 2012 Educational Environments

  9. 2012-13: Percent of Children Attending: Regular EC Program Special Education 42% 26% Special education class, separate school, or residential facility And receiving the majority of special education in the program

  10. 6A: Percent of children with IEPs attending a regular early childhood program (RECP) and receiving the majority of services in the program Each diamond represents a state or territory, SPP/APR SY 2012-2013

  11. Indicator 6B: Percent of children with IEPsattending a special education program Each diamond represents a state or territory, SPP/APR SY 2012-2013

  12. B6 Data Reporting Tools Tools from the IDEA Data Center: Excerpts from the Technical Guide – Children with Disabilities (IDEA) Early Childhood File Specifications https://www.ideadata.org/tools-products Source: EDFacts, File CO89

  13. B6 Data Reporting Tools Decision Tree and Measurement Table debbie.cate@unc.edu

  14. The last national look at challenges and solutions was conducted almost 25 years ago(Smith, Salisbury & Rose, 1992) Preschool Inclusion Survey (Barton & Smith, 2014)

  15. The Facts • Inclusion benefits all children • Children can be effectively educated in inclusive programs using specialized instruction • Families of all children generally have positive views of inclusion • Inclusion is not more expensive • Children do not need to be “ready”

  16. TheFacts • Research is clear: it’s effective • IDEA is clear: it’s preferred • The profession is clear: DEC/NAEYC position statement

  17. And Yet In 27 years inclusion has increased only 5.7% And many children continue to be educated in separate settings. • Source: OSEP annual reports: 1987 (1984-85 data); 2014 (2012 data)

  18. The Survey • Preschool inclusion definition: when children (age 3 – 5) with Individual Education Programs (IEP) receive their special education and related services in settings with at least 50% of peers without IEPs • January 2014 • Electronic survey to 619 Coordinators; asked that they send to others • Asked what are the challenges and solutions

  19. The Survey Respondents 238 people responded - from 32 states and 1 territory

  20. The Survey: Roles

  21. Overall Challenges • Attitudes & Beliefs • Fiscal & contracting • Approval of non-public school setting • Curricula/methods • Transportation • Personnel qualifications • Conflicting policies • Program quality

  22. Survey Results: Challenges • Attitudes & Beliefs 30% • Fiscal & contracting 19% • Approval of non-public school setting 16% • Curricula/methods 15% • Transportation 15% • Personnel qualifications 11% • Conflicting policies 10% • Program quality 10%

  23. 3 Categories of Challenges • Attitudes & Beliefs • Policies/Procedures • Resources

  24. Attitude & Belief Challenges • Lack of Communication/collaboration • Lack of awareness/understanding • “Someone will lose” Beliefs • Staff preparedness • Turf issues • Lack of respect • Other

  25. Attitude & Belief Challenges • Lack of Communication/collaboration (20%) • “Someone will lose” Beliefs (20%) • Staff preparedness (17%) • Lack of awareness/understanding (16%) • Turf issues (14%) • Lack of respect (12%) • Other (1%)

  26. Policy/Procedures Challenges • 19 of 70 maybe policy • Most local, then state, then federal • Categories of policy/procedure challenges: • Ensuring quality (standards, curricula, practices) in inclusive settings • Ensuring personnel meet standards and are effective • Fiscal policies/procedures (contracting; $ streams) • Transportation policies/procedures

  27. Resource Challenges • Community programs full; no available slots • Lack of resources for transportation for typically developing children • Lack of resources for itinerate services

  28. Solutions

  29. Attitude & Belief Solutions/Strategies Two categories • Collaboration across regular EC and ECSE personnel; between district and community programs • Building awareness/support

  30. A/B: Build Awareness/Support • Educate local administrators • Provide user-friendly materials on benefits & laws • Provide models of high quality inclusion where teachers, parents and administrators can visit • Provide opportunities for practitioners, administrators and families to explore concerns, benefits and possible solutions

  31. A/B: Collaborate • Establish trans-disciplinary teams • Establish interagency inclusion team • Provide awareness materials and opportunities for administrators • Provide joint PD for district and community personnel • Ensure support to community programs for ECSE and behavior support • Build culture of collaborative problem solving

  32. Policy/Procedure Solutions/Strategies • Ensure state funded pre-k, at-risk & Title I programs are inclusive • Require co-teaching (EC & ECSE) practica for certification • Provide training and coaching to community programs & itinerate ECSE services • Provide state training and T/A to district and community EC programs • Create MOU’s and contracts with community programs that address quality

  33. Policy/Procedure Solutions/Strategies • Provide paras to community sites • Create tuition based access to district EC programs for nondisabled children • Reimburse parents for transportation • Create a state-level inclusion team for “barrier busting” that responds to local concerns • State dissemination to districts of creative ways to provide inclusion; examples; incentives • Braid funding streams

  34. Resource Solutions/Strategies • Inclusive services do not cost more than segregated • Braid resources • Collaborate • Redistribute (itinerate/consultative vs. segregated) • Public awareness of the benefits=$$

  35. Resources

  36. New LRE Resources

  37. http://ectacenter.org/topics/inclusion/default.asp

  38. Hope to see you there! http://inclusioninstitute.fpg.unc.edu/

  39. Thank you for your attention! Resources related to this webinar and other presentations are available at the following URL: http://ectacenter.org/webinars.asp

More Related