220 likes | 347 Views
MCAS Performance Spring 2007. Newburyport Public Schools October 15, 2007. Encouraging Results. We are showing improvement in Newburyport, and also moving ahead of the state average Tenth grade scores have reached new highs
E N D
MCAS Performance Spring 2007 Newburyport Public Schools October 15, 2007
Encouraging Results • We are showing improvement in Newburyport, and also moving ahead of the state average • Tenth grade scores have reached new highs • Middle school math focus showed results with advanced and proficient percentages up across the board • Middle school science scores moved from below state average to way above • This year’s results better reflect the quality of education in Newburyport and validate our commitment to improvement
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 12 Lynnfield 27 Hamilton-Wenham 43 Newburyport 43 Ipswich 53 Masconomet 53 North Andover 60 Georgetown 60 Scituate 69 Burlington 69 Pentucket Regional 75 Bedford 83 Swampscott 83 Wakefield 83 North Reading 126 Amesbury 168 Triton Regional Banner Results in10th Grade ELA and Math MATHEMATICS 23 Newburyport 23 Lynnfield 23 Bedford 29 Burlington 37 Hamilton-Wenham 37 Masconomet 57 Georgetown 68 North Andover 81 Scituate 112 Swampscott 136 Pentucket Regional 112 Wakefield 112 North Reading 128 Amesbury 145 Triton Regional 152 Ipswich Reference Communities Rank among 312 High Schools
Spring 2007 MCAS – English Language Arts Grade 10 Three Year Comparison of District Performance Level Results
Spring 2007 MCAS – Mathematics Grade 10 Three Year Comparison of District Performance Level Results
Reading & English Language ArtsPercent (%) of Students Scoring A&P (Advanced/Proficient) or W (Warning/Failed)
MathematicsPercent (%) of Students Scoring A&P (Advanced/Proficient) or W (Warning/Failed)
Science and Technology/EngineeringPercent (%) of Students Scoring A&P (Advanced/Proficient) or W (Warning/Failed)
Reading & English Language Arts Percentage: Advanced & Proficient, also Warning/Failed
Mathematics Percentage: of Advanced & Proficient, also Warning/Failed
Science and Technology/Engineering Percentage: Advanced & Proficient, also Warning/Failed
4 6 8 10 4 6 8 10 4 6 8 10 Newburyport Students w/Disabilities vs. State Students w/Disabilities Gr. 4, Gr. 6, Gr. 8, & Gr. 10 Spring 2007 English Language Arts
4 6 8 10 4 6 8 10 4 6 8 10 Newburyport Students w/Disabilities vs. State Students w/DisabilitiesGr. 4, Gr. 6, Gr. 8, & Gr. 10 Spring 2007 Mathematics
4 4 4 6 6 6 8 8 8 Newburyport Low Income Students vs. State Low Income Students Gr. 4, Gr. 6, & Gr. 8 Spring 2007 English Language Arts
4 4 4 6 6 6 8 8 8 Newburyport Low Income Students vs. State Low Income Students Gr. 4, Gr. 6, & Gr. 8 Spring 2007 Mathematics
Analysis is Next • Date scheduled for analysis is the full release day, November 6, 2007 • Structure of the day • Principals present an overview of MCAS data to the staff • Teachers work in professional learning communities to analyze student scores • District faculty comes together in the afternoon to share district level content area conclusions and recommendations
Summary • Continue to develop and sustain effective change strategies at the school level • Sustain interventions that have been put in place to support MCAS achievement • Build consensus curriculum that includes frequent assessments K-12 • Implement a comprehensive literacy model K-6 • Develop a district-wide literacy focus • Continue to make significant gains in the advanced and proficient categories each year
Spring 2007 MCAS Tests Grade 9 & 10 Newburyport Girls vs. State Girls and Newburyport Boys vs. State Boys