90 likes | 233 Views
Goddard Airborne Radar Activities for Studies of Precipitation and Clouds. Gerald Heymsfield and Robert Meneghini. Science Rationale for Doppler Radars on High-altitude Aircraft.
E N D
Goddard Airborne Radar Activities for Studies of Precipitation and Clouds Gerald Heymsfield and Robert Meneghini
Science Rationale for Doppler Radars on High-altitude Aircraft • They provide measurements of weather phenomena and associated rainfall with higher resolution than possible from spaceborne or surface-based measurements. • They can be used as test bed for new hardware techniques to improve satellite rain algorithms (TRMM, GPM). • Doppler radars provide important information on both the precipitation structure and the dynamics of precipitation and clouds through profiled vertical motion measurements.
Mapping of EDOP and CRS Measurements Into Code Y Strategic Plan • EDOP and CRS through process studies (field campaigns) and new technology development provide information toward the following questions: • What are the effects of clouds and surface hydrologic processes on earth’s climate? • How can weather forecast duration and reliability be improved by new space-based observations, data assimilation, and modeling? • How are global precipitation, evaporation, and the cycling of water changing?
Goddard Airborne Radars • ER-2 Doppler Radar (EDOP) • 9.6 GHz Doppler precipitation radar • Effective for studying convection, hurricanes, etc. • Developed at GSFC and flown since 1993 • Measures vertical structure of precipitation and 2-D winds • ER-2 Cloud Radar System (CRS) • 94 GHz Doppler radar developed at GSFC and under SBIR • Highly sensitive radar for cirrus and atmospheric radiation studies • Will fly soon for CRYSTAL and can provide CloudSat validation for high-altitude cirrus clouds • Measures vertical structure of clouds and vertical motions
nadir 20 pointing • • • • • • • • beam Vectors are • • • • • • • combined to • • • obtain vert. V f hydrometeor V n • • • • • • • motions and • along-track winds 10 HEIGHT (KM) • • • • • • • • forward pointing • • • • • • • • beam 37.5 m • • • • • • • • 100 m 0 TIME, DISTANCE ER-2 Doppler Radar (EDOP) • Precipitation X-band (9.6 GHz) Doppler radar located in nose of NASA ER-2 high-altitude aircraft emulates satellite view • Dual-fixed antennas for nadir and forward views along aircraft track • Forward and nadir beam measure intensity and air motions in precipitation region • Forward beam provides dual polarization capability for micro- physical characterization of precipitation (liquid, snow, hail)
Development Work in Progress • Cloud Radar System • Heymsfield, CRS completion for ER-2 flights during CRYSTAL (NRA funded) • Required significant in-house integration • Differential-frequency techniques for radar • Meneghini and Bidwell, FY2001 DDF • Approach applied to EDOP ground-based measurements with 1 GHz frequency difference • IIP proposal written in 2001 but not funded. • Not proposed but promising: Use of closely spaced freqencies (1 MHz separation) for Doppler radar measurements from space.
Differential-frequency Doppler Radar(DDF funding FY2001) • Basic Idea • Measure dual-wavelength Doppler data with a single broad-band antenna & transmitter/receiver • availability of power amplifier is a critical technological item • require broad-band antenna with well-matched patterns • small differential signal levels require large # of samples • Useful meteorological information can be gathered by proper choice of frequencies • Ka-band frequencies with 7%-10% separation • information can be used to estimate: • rain rate, liquid water content, particle phase state • characteristics of the snow & rain size distributions • vertical speed of hydrometeors & air motion
Goddard Engineering Expertise • Both EDOP and CRS have involved annually about 1 MY of microwave engineering support from the Microwave Instrument Technology Branch (Code 555) • CRS has involved low-level support from Code 567 for antenna testing, as well as guidance from other Code 500 groups on technical issues. • The support for the CRS development and for EDOP calibration and improvements has been lower than required, necessitating contractor engineering support. • Most of the engineering effort has be used for developing field deployable ER-2 radars rather than development of new technologies such as the differential frequency radar concept.