100 likes | 211 Views
“Multisubject, Multimodal Demo Dataset” Henson et al (2011) Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Wakeman & Henson (in prep) ftp://ftp.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/personal/rik.henson/wakemandg_hensonrn/ 16 Subjects Each subject did 2 Experiments (2 visits): 1. MEG + EEG 2. fMRI + MRI
E N D
“Multisubject, Multimodal Demo Dataset” Henson et al (2011) Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Wakeman & Henson (in prep) ftp://ftp.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/personal/rik.henson/wakemandg_hensonrn/ 16 Subjects Each subject did 2 Experiments (2 visits): 1. MEG + EEG 2. fMRI + MRI EEG = 70 channels, nose-reference (concurrent with MEG) MEG = 102 magnetometers + 204 planar gradiometers (Neuromag) fMRI = BOLD EPI 3x3x3 (3T Siemens Trio) MRI = T1 MPRAGE 1x1x1 (Also available: DTI data on 11 of the 16 subjects FLASH data on all 16 subjects (head modelling)) Empty-room MEG datasets Raw stimuli and processing scripts Extra 5 subjects with incomplete data) Each experiment had 3 types of grayscale faces: Famous Unfamiliar (previously unseen) Phase-scrambled versions of above 300 trials of each (ie 900 in total, split across 6 (MEEG) or 9 (fMRI) runs) Subjects judged left-right symmetry of each (Soon to be a chapter in SPM12 manual, together with example scripts)
“Multisubject, Multimodal Demo Dataset” • Henson et al (2011) Frontiers in Human Neuroscience • Wakeman & Henson (in prep) • ftp://ftp.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/personal/rik.henson/wakemandg_hensonrn/ • Demo Plan for Today: • Illustrate Scalp-Time Stats across Trials within One Subject • Illustrate Time-Freq Stats across 16 Subjects • <break?> • Illustrate Source Reconstruction and Stats across 16 Subjects
subject):Famous subject):Unfamiliar subject):Scramble Potential Difference relative to average over electrodes (V)