Download
1 / 17
170 likes | 197 Views
M&E Joint Programming in Mozambique 12 th May 2009. Background: a much more clear environment. 3 rd generation UNDAF 07-09. PARPA II 06-09. UNDAF Guiding principles: 1) complete alignment between the selected UNDAF and PARPA II pillars; 2) clear reference to the PARPA II priorities ;
E N D
Background: a much more clear environment 3rd generation UNDAF 07-09 PARPA II 06-09 UNDAF Guiding principles: 1) complete alignment between the selected UNDAF and PARPA II pillars; 2) clear reference to the PARPA II priorities; 3) all UNDAF outcomes should involve at least two, and preferably three or more UN agencies; 4) priorities should be based on tangible/measurable results with corresponding baselines; and 5) all planned outcomes should complement contributions made by the UN’s development partners.
Background: a much more clear environment PARPA II 06-09 3rd generation UNDAF 07-09 • Delivering as One UN: Operational Plan of the UN System in Mozambique 2007-2009 • One Programme • One Budgetary Framework • One Leader • One Office and Common Services • Communicating as One
Background: a much more clear environment, but complex PARPA II M&E System PARPA II 06-09 UNDAF M&E Framework: Outcome and Output UNDAF 07-09 • UNDAF M&E Framework focused on OUTPUT • Core Success Factors • Stocktaking Reports Delivering as One UN: Operational Plan of the UN System in Mozambique 2007-2009
Background: a much more clear environment, but complex PARPA II M&E System Annual Joint Assessment by Sectors and Final Eval. UNDAF M&E Framework: Outcome and Output UNDAF MTR & Final Evaluation • UNDAF M&E Framework focused on OUTPUT. • Core Success Factors: not conducted yet. • Stocktaking Annual Reports. • UNDAF M&E Framework focused on OUTPUT • Core Success Factors • Stocktaking Reports
MDG: Impact and Outcome indicators MDG 60 impact and outcome indicators
UNDAF: Impact, outcome and output indicatorsJoint Programmes: Focused in output indicators MDG PARPA UNDAF 11 Joint Programmes Situation monitoring and analysis Quality assurance activities Performance monitoring and evaluation
Key M&E activities • A total of 269 indicators, most of them OUTPUT indicators. • 478 Indicator-Unit-Subpopulation, and 123 lack data: source, year or no data at all.
Core Success Factors and Stocktaking Reports • Aim to monitor and evaluate the DaO UN at country level: • CSF: 21 Success Factors and 41 indicators identified. • Stocktaking report due annually through a questionnaire.
M&E Reference Group: oversight for M&E of the UNDAF • Established in the context of UNDAF. • Initially UNDAF oriented through the UNDAF Monitoring and Evaluation framework, then DaO. • Chaired by RC and member from different agencies: WHO, WFP, UNICEF, UNESCO, UNIFEM, FAO, UNFPA, UNAIDS. • Develop AWP and met in regular basis at least one a month. • Focus on database development: Dev-Info with more than 400 indicators.
What is being done? • Database developed, but now is not in use. • Technical assistance for the Stocktaking Reports 2007 and 2008. • Participation in the UNDAF MTR and Joint Program Review. • Participation in the UNDAF 2010 – 2011 extension document, mostly in the review of indicators (currently in progress). • Permanent participation of M&E Chair in the PMT meetings. • Review of Core Success Factor Indicators. • Technical support to UNCT 2008 AWP indicators. • PARPA II evaluation.
In this complex context there are still CHALANGES in Mozambique: • UN Reform must reconsider resources needed for M&E. • UN M&E is most concentrated in process than impact. • M&E must be part of the planning and management processes. • UN still investing more time and resources in planning, less in implementing and very few in M&E. • Still we need to promote an M&E culture in the UN.
M&E Reference Group Challanges UN M&E needs N O C O R R E S P O N D E N C E UNM&E investment
Time dedicated to M&E A lot Some Few Time dedicated Planning Implementing Monitoring / Evaluation 16
