130 likes | 326 Views
History of Project 95. In September 2007, DHS formed the Project 95 Committee. The ?95" refers to the percent of individuals that need, but do not get treatment. The Committee, comprised of legislators, state officials, providers, and community leaders, charged DHS with identifying the types of s
E N D
1. Arkansas Addictions System Reform: Project 95 Update November 5, 2010
Department of Human Services
2. History of Project 95 In September 2007, DHS formed the Project 95 Committee. The “95” refers to the percent of individuals that need, but do not get treatment.
The Committee, comprised of legislators, state officials, providers, and community leaders, charged DHS with identifying the types of services and funding necessary to close the addiction treatment gap.
3. History of Project 95 (cont.) In the fall of 2007, DHS initially contracted with John O’Brien to assist with developing a plan for designing and financing a continuum of publicly funded substance abuse treatment services for adults, children and their families in Arkansas.
To kickoff the new initiative, DHS held the first Project 95 stakeholder meeting in March 2008.
4. Project Goals Identify the potential substance abuse treatment and support services
Develop consistent definitions for these services and supports across purchasers
Develop provider and practitioner qualifications for services
Develop a process for certifying qualified providers
Identify/develop reimbursement methodologies to support these services
Identify the potential funding streams for these services and supports Services recommended by SAMHSA and the National Quality Forum
Other jurisdictions that have been identified as model systems
Services covered or purchased by federal funding sources
Identifying current Arkansas formats for defining services
Reviewing other jurisdictions and funding source approaches to defining services
Proposing a template for service definitions
Review current practice acts—who is allowed to provide the service
Review current processes to license or certify providers
Identify federal regulations that may impact on who can provide services
Review how services are currently purchased
Identify how other jurisdictions purchase services (methodology and rate)
Develop draft rates for new services
Identify which agencies purchase services
Identify funding streams currently used to purchase services
Identify federal funding streams not accessed or leveraged
Services recommended by SAMHSA and the National Quality Forum
Other jurisdictions that have been identified as model systems
Services covered or purchased by federal funding sources
Identifying current Arkansas formats for defining services
Reviewing other jurisdictions and funding source approaches to defining services
Proposing a template for service definitions
Review current practice acts—who is allowed to provide the service
Review current processes to license or certify providers
Identify federal regulations that may impact on who can provide services
Review how services are currently purchased
Identify how other jurisdictions purchase services (methodology and rate)
Develop draft rates for new services
Identify which agencies purchase services
Identify funding streams currently used to purchase services
Identify federal funding streams not accessed or leveraged
5. Service Definition Work Group DHS formed the Project 95 Service Definition Work Group consisting of public and private mental health and substance abuse providers, advocates, and agency staff to develop a taxonomy of treatment services across multiple payers.
6. Work Group Members Dixie Wallace, Div. of Medical Services
Joie Wallis, Div. of Medical Services
Carol Lee, Child Development Inc.
Tammy Alexander, Div. of Beh. Health Services
Kenny Whitlock/Pam Christie, Mental Health Council
Carole Baxter, Recovery Centers of Arkansas
Dr. Larry Miller, Div. of Beh. Health Services
Dr. Rob Covington, Horizon Treatment Center
Joyce Soularie, Consumer Advocate
Elbert Grimes, Div. of Youth Services
Calvin Wilbon/Linda Robinson, Div. of Children & Family Services
Gary Morgan, DaySpring Beh. Health Services
Joe Hill, Div. of Beh. Health Services OADAP
Sonny Ferguson, Div. of Beh. Health Services OADAP
Fran Flener, State Drug Director
7. Recommended Services In collaboration with John O’Brien, the Work Group recommended a core package of substance abuse services for adults and adolescents which included the following components: elements of the service, provider requirements, staffing requirements, description of the service setting, specific programming requirements, unit measurement, utilization management including authorization process, entrance/continued stay/discharge criteria, anticipated outcomes, exclusions and limitations of each service.
8. Substance Abuse Treatment Services (SATS) Program The Work Group’s recommended outpatient services comprise the core treatment package available in the new SATS Program initially for Medicaid eligible pregnant/post-partum women and adolescents (ages 9-21).
Addiction Assessment
Treatment Planning
Care Coordination
Multi-Person (Family) Group Counseling
Individual Counseling
Group Counseling
Marital/Family Group
Medication Management Additional information is available in the SATS Treatment Manual.Additional information is available in the SATS Treatment Manual.
9. Certification Requirements Current CARF, JCAHO, or COA, that includes accreditation of the pertinent outpatient alcohol and/or other drug abuse treatment component (OADAP Licensure Standards for Alcohol and/or Other Drug Abuse Treatment Programs.
Must be licensed by the Division of Behavioral Health Services, Office of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention (OADAP).
Providers must adhere to evidence-based practices as approved by DBHS for specific populations and services provided and meet the necessary staffing requirements for each of the covered services.
10. Accreditation Training and Technical Assistance In preparation for the new SATS Program, DHS contracted with Life Management Counseling and Consulting, Inc. to offer CARF accreditation training and technical assistance initially to the 6 providers participating in the Arkansas NIATx Implementation Grant with plans to expand through a competitive process to 7 additional providers. Jennifer Glover Gallagher
Janice ReeseJennifer Glover Gallagher
Janice Reese
11. Training and Technical Assistance (cont.) Decision Point, Bentonville
Gateway House, Fort Smith
Harbor House, Fort Smith
Freedom House, Russellville
Quapaw House, Hot Springs
South AR Substance Abuse, El Dorado
Additional information regarding the upcoming CARF accreditation training and technical assistance application process is forthcoming.
12. Next Steps On November 5, the Div. of Beh. Health Services (DBHS) will hold a public hearing to receive feedback on the proposed rules for the new SATS Program.
On November 15, the Div. of Medical Services (DMS) will provide an update to the Public Health Committee on the new SATS Program.
Both DBHS’s and DMS’s proposed rule changes are on the December Rules and Regulations Committee agenda in preparation for the initial implementation of the new SATS Program scheduled for March 2011.
13. Questions? The current draft of the Div. of Beh. Health Services rules of practice and procedures manual for the new SATS Program is available at http://www.arkansas.gov/dhs/dmhs/.
The Div. of Medical Services State Plan Amendment information for the new SATS Program is available at https://www.medicaid.state.ar.us/InternetSolution/General/comment/comment.aspx.