510 likes | 516 Views
This paper discusses neutrino oscillations in matter and their effects on mixing angles and survival probabilities. It also explores the experimental evidence for neutrino oscillations and the implications for sterile neutrinos.
E N D
Neutrino oscillationphysics II Alberto Gago PUCP CTEQ-FERMILAB School 2012 Lima, Perú - PUCP
Oscillation in matter • When neutrinos go through matter they can suffer coherent forward elastic scattering (e.g its four momentum is unchanged) which modifies the mixing angle. L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2369 (1978); ibid. D 20, 2634 (1979) S. P. Mikheyev, A. YuSmirnov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 42 (1986) 913. Neutrino interactions Theinelastic and absorption neutrino Interactions are negligible . They produce a mean free path of theorder of
Oscillation in matter The low-energy charged current hamiltonianis given by: We can rearrangethisusingFierzidentities If we average out the electron current in a medium of electrons we have Since the electrons of the medium are non-relativistic, unpolarized and isotropically distributed only the electron density term survives.
Oscillations in matter • Then :
Oscillation in matter • Sincethematterpotentialis a time likecomponent: Similar tothevacuumpart
Oscillation in matter • Thevacuumhamiltonian:
Oscillation in matter Evolutionequation in matter
Oscillation in matter • From: • Wehaveforconstantdensity: Evolutionequation in the diagonal basis
Oscillation in matter • Wegetfor a constantdensity: Vacuumangle Mixingangle in matter
Oscillation in matter • Similar form to the vacuum oscillation formula for 2:
Oscillation in matter MSW effect
Cos2q=0.38 Oscillation in matter Matter suppresion We can deduce the sign of Dm2
Oscillation in matter • For varying density the evolution equation is described by: Non – diagonal hamiltonian
Oscillation in matter • Adiabatic regime: slow varying density
Oscillations in matter The survival probability in the adiabatic case is: Fastoscillations -(averagedout) largesource-detector distance production detection
Oscillations in matter • Non- adiabatic regime: fast varying density Within an interval around the resonance.
Oscillation in matter • Crossingprobability:
Oscillation in matter • Thesurvivalprobabilityisgivenby: LowEnergy (adiabatic) High Energy(adiabatic) Mattereffects can be neglected Mattereffects are important
Oscillation in matter Howthisprobability looks like: Keeponmindthisplot!
Three neutrino scheme The 3 frameworkwithinthe experimental context: Solar & reactors LBL & atms Reactor & atms * mainlysensitive
Solar neutrinos Solar net reaction CNO-chain pp - chain
Solar neutrino problem Objective of thefirst solar neutrino experiment Todemonstratethatthe Solar Standard model wascorrect Borexino
Solution to the solar neutrino problem SNO ( D2O phase) observes: Charged current Neutral current nxe→nxe Measurement of the solar neutrino flux compatible with the SSM Thisconfirmsthat neutrinos suffer a flavourconversion
Solar neutrinos Borexino Do yourememberthisprobabilityplot? ..MSW transition vacuumdominated Matterdominated Bythewaythesurvivalprobability in 3
Solar neutrinos Reactor-experiments: KamLAND 53 reactors disappearance
Atmospheric neutrinos Theatmosphericneutrino anomalywasfoundtryingtounderstandthebackgroundinvolved in nucleondecaysearches ThentheSuper-Kamiokandeexperiment cameintothegame and…
Atmospheric neutrinos ….observed in 1998 neutrino oscillations No oscillationshypothesis
Long-Baseline experiments(LBL) Disappearance experiments The MINOS experiment The K2K experiment
Long-Baseline experiments(LBL) MINOS experiment K2K experiment No oscillations hep-ex/0606032 No oscillations R. Nichol -Neutrino 2012
Why we believe in neutrino oscillation due to mass? Oscillation maxima OscillationpatterndependsonL/E (not a minordetail in theconfirmation of oscillationduetomass)
Searchesfor -LBL T2K T. Nakaya – Neutrino 2012
Results of T2K MINOS R. Nichol Neutrino 2012 T. Nakaya - Neutrino 2012 This term explains the periodic behaviour in
Search for • Reactors : Source of 2013 coincidence Similar detection concept in KamLAND E. Lisi France Korea China
Results of - Reno 4.9s signalsignificance FD-8% deficit ND-1.8% deficit Only rates Soo-Bong Kim – Neutrino 2012
Results of - Double Chooz Rates + Shape depletion M. Ishitsuka – Neutrino 2012
Results of - Daya Bay No oscillation >8s fromnullhyp. deficit D. Dwyer- Neutrino 2012 Only rates
Global analysis-3 Normal Hierarchy Degeneracy in Inverted Hierarchy Fogli et. Al. Neutrino 2012
Global analysis-3 Precision era arxiv: 1205.5254 G.L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A, Marrone, D. Montanino, A. Palazzo, A. M. Rotunno
LSND anomaly LSND anomaly (muon decay at rest)
LSND anomaly There are various experimental results that constrained the LSND signal : LSND Allowed region negative results
Hints for sterile neutrinos Reactor anomaly : New estimation of flux producedby beta decayfromthefissionproducts of Mention et al 1101.2755 Reactor anomaly
Hints for sterile neutrinos • MiniBooNE: tension C. Polly -Neutrino 2012
Hints for sterile neutrino MiniBooNE neutrino vs antineutrino data MiniBooNE vs LSND antineutrino C. Polly -Neutrino 2012
Sterile neutrino schemes 3+1 3+2 Thesteriledoesnotfeelthe SM interactions
Sterile neutrino 3+1 • Short Baselineexperimentoscillationprobability formula: Onlyoneoscillation frequencyispresent two neutrino system
Sterile neutrino 3+1 • In particular for :
Sterile neutrino 3+1-global analysis T. Schwetz -Neutrino 2012 excluded excluded Consistencybetweenappearance vs disappearance data P=10-5
Sterile neutrino 3+2 analysis Thereisalsotensionin 3+2 betweendisappearance and appearancebounds. Giunti, Laveder, 1109.4033