1 / 29

Game Theory

Game Theory. Topic 7 Information. “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. So is a lot.”. - Albert Einstein. Strategic Use of Information. Incentive Schemes

rangle
Download Presentation

Game Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Game Theory Topic 7Information “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. So is a lot.” - Albert Einstein

  2. Strategic Use of Information • Incentive Schemes • Creating situations in which observable outcomes reveal the unobservable actions of the opponents. • Screening • Creating situations in which the better-informed opponents’ observable actions reveal their unobservable traits.

  3. Moral Hazard & Roulette $50

  4. Moral Hazard • A project with uncertain outcome • Probability of success depends on firm’s effort • prob. of success = 0.6 if effort is routine • prob. of success = 0.8 if effort is high • Firm has cost of effort • cost of routine effort = $100,000 • cost of high effort = $150,000 • project outcome = $600,000 if successful

  5. Compensation Schemes • Benchmarks: • Fixed Payment • Observable Effort • Result-contingent bonus scheme

  6. Incentive Scheme 1: Fixed Payment • A fixed payment must be high enough to get the firm to accept the project • No amount of fixed payment can change the firm’s behavior once it accepts the project

  7. Incentive Scheme 1: Fixed Payment • For any fixed payment, effort will be low: • Payment - $100,000 > Payment - $150,000 • Optimal Payment • Lowest possible • Firm requires at least $100,000 • Payment = $100,000 • Expected Profit • Value of project — payment = (.6) $600K — $100K = $360 - $100 = $260K

  8. Incentive Scheme 2: Observable Effort • If we can observe effort, contracts are simple: • Work as hard as we tell you to, or you are fired • Only question: How hard do we want employees to work? • Remember, salary must be commensurate with level of effort, or no one will take the job

  9. Incentive Scheme 2: Observable Effort • Firm puts in the effort level promised, given its pay • Pay for routine effort: • Avg. Profit = (.6)600,000 – 100,000 = $260,000 • Pay additional $50K for high effort: • Avg. Profit = (.8)600,000 – 150,000 = $330,000 • If effort is observable, pay for high effort • Expected Profit = $330K

  10. Problems • Fixed payment scheme offers no incentives for high effort • High effort is more profitable • Worst case scenario: $260K • Effort-based scheme cannot be implemented • Cannot monitor firm effort • Best case scenario: $330K • Question: how close can we get to best case scenario if effort is unobservable?

  11. Incentive Scheme 3: Fixed Payment and Bonus • Suppose effort can not be observed • Incentive-Compatible compensation • Compensation contract must rely on something that can be directly observed and verified. • Project’s success or failure • Related probabilisticallyto effort • Imperfect but positive information

  12. Observable Outcome • Incentive Compatibility (high > low) • Putting in high effort must be better than putting in low effort • Participation Constraint (high > none) • Putting in high effort must be better than not taking the contract

  13. Incentive Compatibility • Compensation Package (f, b) • f: fixed base payment • b: bonus if the project succeeds

  14. Incentive Compatibility • If Firm puts in high effort • 80% chance of bonus, cost of $150K • Profit: f + (0.8)b – 150K • If Firm puts in low effort • 60% chance of bonus, cost of $100K • Profit: f + (0.6)b – 100K • If Firm does not take contract • Profit: 0

  15. Incentive Compatibility • (high > low) • Firm will put in high effort if f + (0.8)b - 150,000 ≥ f + (0.6)b - 100,000 • (0.2)b ≥ 50,000 marginal benefit of effort > marginal cost • b ≥ $250,000

  16. Incentive Compatibility • Firm will put in high effort if b ≥ $250,000 • To maximize profit, set b as low as possible b = $250,000 • Next, solve participation constraint

  17. Participation • (high > none) • The total compensation should be good enough for the firm to accept the job. • Want firm to prefer high effort to none. • The firm will accept the job if: f + (0.8)b -150,000 ≥ 0

  18. Participation • Firm will accept contract if expected pay is greater than cost f + (0.8)b ≥ 150,000 • Solution • Substitute minimum bonus: f + (0.8)250,000 ≥ $150,000 f + $200,000 ≥ $150,000 f ≥ – $50,000

  19. Negative Fixed Payment? • Certainly not for normal employees • Ante in gambling • Law firms / partnerships • Work bonds / construction • Startup funds • Interpretation: • Capital the firm must put up for the project • Fine the firm must pay if the project fails. • Risk premium

  20. Negative Fixed Payment? • Fixed payment not always negative, but: • Enough outcome-contingent incentive (bonus) to provide incentive to work hard. • Enough certain base wage (salary) to provide incentive to work at all. • Implicitly charging a “risk premium” to party with greatest control.

  21. Benchmarks • Fixed payment scheme: • Worst case scenario: $260K • Effort-based scheme: • Best case scenario: $330K • Fixed payment and bonus: Exp. Profit = (.8)600,000 – (.8)b – f = (.8)600,000 – (.8)250,000 + 50,000 = $330,000 • Same as with observable effort!!!

  22. Moral Hazard In the presence of uncertainty: Assign the risk to the better informed party. Efficiency and greater profits result. The more risks are transferred to the well-informed party, the more profit is earned.

  23. Moral Hazard CAVEAT In the presence of uncertainty: Assign the risk to the better informed party. Efficiency and greater profits result. BUT If done imprecisely, may be better not to bother.

  24. Negative Fixed Payment? • Bonus depends on • difference between low and high effort costs • Fixed payment depends on • absolute magnitude of costs • Example: Firm has cost of effort • cost of routine effort = $250,000 (+$150K) • cost of high effort = $300,000 (+$150K) • BONUS UNCHANGED (b = $250,000) • FIXED INCREASES (f = $100,000)

  25. Summary • Can perfectly compensate for information asymmetry • Let employee take the risk • Use two part contracts (salary and bonus) • Often, this is unreasonable • Employees unwilling to assume risks • Contracts must be perfectly balanced • May be better to settle for low effort

  26. Risk Aversion Risk Risk Risk Seeking Neutral Averse Lottery Corporations (small stakes) one-time deals Multiple Insurance Gambles (big stakes)

  27. Biased coin flip: 52%-48% Would you bet $1000 on it? Chance of Loss 48%

  28. Biased coin flip: 52%-48% Would you bet $100 on it 10 times? Chance of Loss 33%

  29. Biased coin flip: 52%-48% Would you bet $1 on it 1000 times? Chance of Loss 10%

More Related