1 / 5

Common Endpoint Locator Pools (CELP)

Common Endpoint Locator Pools (CELP). draft-crocker-celp Dave Crocker Avri Doria Multiple multiaddressing schemes Different approaches have different benefits Proposal: Share locator pools across independent associations Reduce multiaddressing control transaction costs

ranit
Download Presentation

Common Endpoint Locator Pools (CELP)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Common Endpoint Locator Pools (CELP) • draft-crocker-celp • Dave Crocker • Avri Doria • Multiple multiaddressing schemes • Different approaches have different benefits • Proposal: • Share locator pools across independent associations • Reduce multiaddressing control transaction costs • Improve availability of locator performance information D. Crocker 9/5/2014

  2. Synergy Across Associations • Transport-based schemes • Multiplex control exchange in data stream, so control data does not increase packet overhead • Can naturally obtain path quality information • Wedge-based schemes • Multiaddressing for legacy transports • Naturally independent of individual transport associations • Can operate asynchronously of associations, deferring control exchanges, often needing no exchange • Can maintain pools with different referential granularity D. Crocker 9/5/2014

  3. Variable granularity {local, remote} {local, remote, flow} {local, remote, protocol, port} {local, remote, type of service} Status Reachability Performance Framework TportMA TCP AddDeleteModify WedgeMA LocatorPools H1all EP2sip EP2file H = host EP = endpoint MA = multiaddressing IP D. Crocker 9/5/2014

  4. Issues • Path selection • Which paths are available or better? • Suggestion: Defer generality; start with primary and fallback choices • Local/Remote combinatorials • Suggestion: Defer generality; start with just {remote} or {local, remote} • Security • Different schemes have different degrees of security  concern about weakest participant affects entire service • Maintaining synchrony among different modifiers of pool • Referential commonality • Different schemes use different identifiers • How to know that different locators refer to same endpoint? • Suggestion: That’s what domain names are for… D. Crocker 9/5/2014

  5. Next Steps • Resolve • Differential security issues • Near-term vs. long-term issues • Determining common endpoint referencing • Formulate CELP service model details • Data structures • Operations D. Crocker 9/5/2014

More Related