330 likes | 492 Views
2. Presenters. Timothy KvizPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPMichael SpergerGMAC Commercial Holding Corp.Thomas RammFirst Horizon Home LoansBob ReynoldsSunTrust Mortgage. 3. Agenda. SAB 105Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial AssetsMortgage Servicing Rights at Fair ValueThree Company
E N D
1. Mortgage Bankers Association 2004 National Secondary Market Conference Understanding the Business Implications of New and Proposed Accounting Rules
April 19, 2004
2. 2 Presenters Timothy Kviz
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Michael Sperger
GMAC Commercial Holding Corp.
Thomas Ramm
First Horizon Home Loans
Bob Reynolds
SunTrust Mortgage
3. 3 Agenda SAB 105
Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets
Mortgage Servicing Rights at Fair Value
Three Company Perspectives
4. 4 SAB 105 - Overview FASB adds Loan Commitments project to agenda in October 2003
MBA and industry representatives deliver overview of issues in an educational session to FASB Board in December 2003
AICPA National Conference on Current SEC Developments
SEC states loan commitments are written options
Value of loan commitments must be a liability, since they are written options
Substantial efforts made to address SEC position
5. 5 SAB 105 - Scope Applies to loan commitments for mortgage loans held for sale within the scope of FAS 149 and DIG Issue C-13
Retail originations and Wholesale commitments – broker and table funding
Applies to all mortgage loans held for sale discussed in FAS 65
Residential AND commercial
Wholesale commitments - closed loans from correspondents
If they meet the definition of a derivative under FAS 133, apply SAB 105 by analogy
6. 6 SAB 105 - Effective Date Effective for all loan commitments entered into on or after April 1, 2004
Loan commitments entered into prior to effective date
SEC will not object to accounting treatment that differs from guidance in SAB 105
7. 7 SAB 105 - Key Provisions Initial recognition (i.e., Day 1 accounting)
Cannot consider cash flows related to servicing in value
Cannot consider internally-developed intangible assets in value
Disclosures
No new requirements
APB 22, FAS 107, FAS 133, MD&A
8. 8 SAB 105 – Other Considerations Implementation issues
EITF 02-3 – no value on Day 1
Day 2 accounting not specifically addressed
Changes in fair value recorded in the income statement
Commitment can have an asset value
Fair value excludes normal servicing and internally developed intangible assets
FIN 39 implications
Cannot net asset and liability positions
9. 9 SAB 105 – Other Considerations Components of Value
10. 10 SAB 105 – Other Considerations Once a loan has closed
Value of commitment rolled into the basis of the loan
Basis adjustment not amortized – held until loan is sold
Loan value for LOCOM or FAS 133 Fair Value hedge accounting includes ALL components of value
Servicing NOT excluded
FAS 133 – FV hedging – full change in fair value – cannot exclude servicing component
FAS 65 – full change in fair value for market the company operates
FAS 141 – full value of loan until servicing is contractually separated
11. 11 Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets Current guidance
Beneficial interests exempt from FAS 133
Classified as AFS or trading if its possible the investor may not recover substantially all the recorded investment
Other interests may be classified as HTM
12. 12 Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets Proposed Guidance
Beneficial interests NOT exempt from FAS 133
Framework for accounting for the interests being debated
Trading classification
Give the holder of the beneficial interest an election to either
account for their interest as a “trading security” or
bifurcate an embedded derivative from the host instrument and (a) account for the embedded derivative under Statement 133 and (b) the host instrument under Statement 115 (e.g. available-for-sale).
13. 13 Mortgage Servicing Rights at Fair Value FAS 122, 125, 140 – provided accounting guidance for recognition, amortization, and impairment of MSRs
FAS 133 – hedge accounting guidance
DIG Issues F1 and F8 address MSR specific hedging issues
Proposed Amendment to FAS 140 issued in June 2003
Comment letters from several organizations include a call for MSRs at fair value
FASB receives numerous requests from constituents requesting fair value treatment for MSRs
Complexity in dealing with hedge accounting, comparability, and transparency issued cited as reasons in favor of FV
14. 14 Mortgage Servicing Rights at Fair Value LOCOM Accounting Model
Diversity in applying current GAAP may sometimes lead to transparency and comparability issues
Stratification
Amortization
Valuation allowance
Other than temporary impairment
The application of FAS133 and LOCOM creates an accounting model that is too complex
Lack of comparability and transparency
15. 15 Mortgage Servicing Rights at Fair Value Fair Value Accounting Model
industry employs fair value methods in the current accounting model
has proven methods in place to derive fair value estimates
operational and systems concerns that were once problematic for the industry are less of a concern today
elimination of certain LOCOM and FAS133 requirements would further alleviate accounting, operational and systems risks
16. 16 Mortgage Servicing Rights at Fair Value January 2004 – FASB adds project to agenda
March 2004 – Educational session and meeting to discuss the project
Summary of Decisions Reached:
Fair value is the appropriate measurement attribute
Other servicing rights to be considered for the scope of the standard
Staff to investigate feasibility of a separate project to permit, but not require, entities to account for financial instruments and similar instruments at fair value (similar to IAS 39)
17. 17 Mortgage Servicing Rights at Fair Value Key decisions to be addressed in future meetings:
Scope of the project
Just MSRs
All servicing rights
All residual and beneficial interests
When should fair value be applied
At inception and subsequent to inception
Subsequent to inception only
Potential impacts on FAS 140
Additional disclosure requirements
18. 18 Mortgage Servicing Rights at Fair Value Issues if fair value is elective, or if MSRs are accounted for like available for sale investment securities:
Comparability issues would still exist
Reported amounts
Disclosures
Complexity of an AFS accounting model
Applicability of EITF 99-20
Potential inconsistencies with IFRS
Potential for future changes with convergence
19. 19 REPORTING MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS AT FAIR VALUE
Three Company Perspectives:
GMAC Commercial Mortgage Holding Corp.
First Horizon Home Loans
SunTrust Mortgage
20. Mortgage Bankers Association 2004 National Secondary Market Conference Michael Sperger GMAC Commercial Holding Corp. April 19, 2004