490 likes | 652 Views
Progresses of development of cfosat scatterometer. Xiaolong Dong , Di Zhu CAS Key Laboratory of Microwave Remote Sensing National Space Science Center, CAS PO Box 8701, Beijing, China dongxiaolong@mirslab.cn , zhudi@mirslab.cn. Outline of the Presentation. Introduction to the Mission
E N D
Progresses of development of cfosatscatterometer Xiaolong Dong, Di Zhu CAS Key Laboratory of Microwave Remote Sensing National Space Science Center, CAS PO Box 8701, Beijing, China dongxiaolong@mirslab.cn, zhudi@mirslab.cn
Outline of the Presentation Introduction to the Mission Specifications of SCAT Description of SCAT system Simulation of SCAT system performances Progresses Summary
CFOSAT Mission • CFOSAT: Chinese French Oceanography SATellie • Launch plan: 2014 • Mission Objectives: monitoring the wind and waves at the ocean surface at the global scale in order to improve: • The wind and wave forecast for marine meteorology (including severe events) • the ocean dynamics modeling and prediction, • our knowledge of climate variability • fundamental knowledge on surface processes linked to wind and waves • Two payloads: • SWIM (Sea Wave Investigation and Monitoring by satellite) • A Ku-band real aperture radar for measurement of directional ocean wave spectra; • SCAT (SCATterometer) • A Ku-band rotating fan-beam radar scatterometer for measurement of ocean surface wind vector.
Mission-measurement requirements • Joint measurement of ocean surface wind vector and sea-state parameters from radar • Both wind vector and wave parameters can be measured using active micro-wave remote sensing (heritage of altimeter, sactterometer and SAR missions, and airborne radar measurements) • Wind vector => optimal configuration at medium incidence angle (20-50°) • Wave spectra => optimal configuration at low incidence angle (< 15°) • CFOSAT mission with two payloads • SWIM: wave scatterometer: multi-beam Ku-Band radar at low incidence • SCAT: wind scatteromer: Fan beam Ku-Band radar at medium incidence 4
Rotating fan-beam antenna Flight direction Nadir Point Swath footprint Mission-Wind Vector Payload -SCAT • A Ku-band rotating fan-beam radar scatterometer (Ku-RFSCAT) for sea surface wind vector retrieval by measurement of the sea surface backscattering coefficient. • Adapted to the platform constraints (small size); • 2 fan beams (HH & VV) cover incident angles from 26 degree to 46 degree from nadir • scanned with a rotation speed of around 3.5 rpm. • For each of the ground resolution cells, more than four looking angles can be obtained to retrieval wind vector information.
Characteristics of CFOSAT SCAT • Wide swath by rotating of beam; • Decided by outer edge of incident angle of beam • More number of azimuth look angles by overlap of beam; • Decided by flying speed, rotating speed and beamwidth • NRCS/sigma 0 dependent on antenna beam; • Decided by local antenna gain along elevation • Single antenna for all azimuth directions; • No inter-beam balance required • But azimuth fluctuation may exist due to rotating mechanism
Azimuth look angle combinations for surface resolution cells
Specifications for SCAT • Objectives: • Measurement of global surface sigma 0 • Retrieval of global ocean surface wind vector • Data requirements • Swath width: >1000km • Surface resolution: 50km (standard); 25km (goal) • Data quality (at 50km resolution) • s° precision: • 1.0dB for wind speed 4~6m/s • 0.5dB for wind speed 6~24m/s • Wind speed: 2m/s or 10% @ 4~25m/s • Wind direction: 20deg @ 360deg for most part of the swath • Life time: 3yrs
Description of SCAT system System overview Choice of system type Operation mode System configuration Key parameters
System overview • Ku-band rotating fan-beam scatterometer • Platform dimension • Technology heritage • Available GMFs • Long LMF pulse with de-ramp pulse compression • TX: 1.35ms • RX: 2.72 ms • Digital I-Q receiver with on-board pulse compression processing and resolution cell regrouping • TX/RX channel except antenna and switch matrix identical primary/backup design to ensure liability
Why rotating beam? Overlap of surface coverage with SWIM is requirement, nadir gap should be avoided. Deployment of multiple fan-beam antenna is not allowed due to platform capability. Large swath at a relatively low orbit (~500km) requires scanning. Why rotating fan beam? Lower rotating speed to ensure life time of rotating mechanism; Multiple incident angles for better wind direction retrieval; Large incident angle ranges (20~46°) for investigation of ocean surface scattering characteristics, by compensating with SWIM (0~10°) Choice of system type-Why rotating fan beam?
Other constraints Antenna dimension: <1.2m Available Pulsed Ku-TWTA: <140W Available TWTA PRF: >150Hz Data rate: <220kpbs Rotating speed and mechanism lifetime
Operation mode • Normal mode: dual polarization with rotation; • Test/cal mode: • raw waveform with lower PRF; • Including both rotating mode and fixed pointing mode; • Single polarization mode
Antenna subsystem Antenna and feeding network; Scanning mechanism; Servo controller; RF subsystem Switch matrix; RF receiver; RX/TX electronics subsystem IF receiver; Frequency synthesizers; TX up-converter Power amplifier subsystem TWT and EPC Digital subsystem Signal generator; System controller; Signal processor; Communication controller; Secondary power supply subsystem DC-DC power converter; TC/TM module WG & cable assembly System configuration
System configuration • Interface with structure subsystem • Antenna and part of the servo mechanism installed outside the satellite; • Other equipments installed inside the satelltie
Optimization of radar parameters • Optimization: trade-off between SNR, measurement samples of each look and number of looks. maximization of wind vector retrieval performance • Surface resolution • Signal bandwidth • Rotating speed
Resolution in azimuth direction& azimuth beam-width • Fan beamlower gainantenna as long as possible • Decided by antenna beamwidth • Limited by satellite dimension: ≤1.2m • Beamwidth ~1.1 deg resolution in azimuth direction: 10.5~14.5km
Design of rotating speed • Trade-off between independent sigma 0measuremrent samples for single look and number of looks • Optimization of 3.5rpm
Resolution in elevation direction& signal bandwidth • Low SNR due to low antenna gain • Bandwidth 0.5MHz resolution:380~650m • On-board non-coherent re-grouping to improve sigma 0 precision resolution of 5km
Onboard processing • Reduce data rate to ~220kbps • Downlink data resolution: ~10km(az) × 5km(el) • (original resolution: 10km(az) × (<1km(el)) • Signal+noise processing & noise-only processing
Simulations of system performances • Simulation model • Simulation of sigma 0 precision • Simulation of wind vector retrieval performance
Simulation of s° precision • Modeling • Radar equation • SNR • s° precision
Statistics:number of looks (left) number of independent samples (right)
SNR distribution U=4m/s U=8m/s U=16m/s U=24m/s
Kp distribution (25km) U=4m/s U=8m/s U=16m/s U=24m/s
Simulation of wind retrieval • Only s°data with precision better than 1.0dB will be used for wind retrieval; • Standard MLE method and NSCAT GMF are used for simulation; • Median filter algorithm for wind direction ambiguity removal • 2 kinds of wind field simulated • Spatially correlated parallel wind field and circular wind field • Random wind field
Random wind field • Parallel wind field simulated • Wind speed range: 4~24m/s • Wind direction search interval: 10deg • 25km WVC resolution
Progresses of CFOSAT/SCAT • 2010.04 PDR of SCAT • 2010.12 Detailed design review • 2011.07 Delivery of electrical models (except antenna subsystem) and satellite electrical performance test • System specifications, interface compatibility confirmed • 2011.11 Delivery of mechanical and thermal models • 2011.12 Satellite mechanical test • 2012.02 Satellite thermal test • 2012.05 RF compatibility test • 2012.07 Onboard full operation mode test
Summary • Design and performance of CFOSAT SCAT is presented: • When U<4m/s, SCAT/CFOSAT cannot provide useful wind retrieval due to its low SNR; • For U=4~8m/s, SCAT/CFOSAT can provide wind retrieval similar to QSCAT only within swath of 800km; • For U>8m/s, SCAT/CFOSAT can provide better wind retrieval with its designed swath of 1000km, compared with QSCAT; • For U>16m/s, the advantage of SCAT/CFOSAT become obvious, due to its more number of looks. • Development of SCAT on time for the scheduled launch in 2014.
Further to do… • New quality control for sigma-0 measurement with more number of looks and lower SNR; • Development of retrieval making use of increased number of looks; • Evaluation of rain effect, compared with pencil beam system like QSCAT; • Calibration for rotating fan beam system: • In-orbit antenna pattern calibration; • In-orbit possible azimuth-dependent antenna gain variation due to rotary joint.