240 likes | 453 Views
Toxicology Component of FDA’s Action Plan for Acrylamide. Richard Canady, PhD DABT US Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition www.cfsan.fda.gov. Food Advisory Sub-Committee Meeting December 4 and 5, 2002. Goal of the toxicity component of FDA’s action plan.
E N D
Toxicology Component of FDA’s Action Plan for Acrylamide Richard Canady, PhD DABT US Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition www.cfsan.fda.gov Food Advisory Sub-Committee Meeting December 4 and 5, 2002
Goal of the toxicity component of FDA’s action plan Examine the likelihood that adverse health effects are caused by exposure to acrylamide-containing foods.
Context for toxicology research • Ongoing assessment of knowledge base for acrylamide • Past assessments for • Food contact materials, cosmetics, water treatment, pesticide inert ingredient, specialized grout, monomer/polymer manufacture, coal mining, cigarette smoke • Knowledge has changed with regard to • How we are exposed • Ingestion from food, not just water • The levels to which we are exposed
Data gap evaluations • World Health Organization/ Food and Agriculture Organization (WHO/FAO) consultation in June • Interagency meeting in September • Joint Institute for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (JIFSAN) workshop in October • Expert panel at Emerging Neurotoxicology Conference in November • Workshop for germ cell mutagen risk assessment Spring 2003
Outline of presentation of what we know, need, and are planning • Toxicokinetics • Animal carcinogen • Human neurotoxicant • Reproductive/developmental effects • Safety/risk assessment
1. What we know for toxicokinetics • Absorbed orally • Degree of absorption from food has not been studied • Most toxicity information from drinking water or injections • Wide and uniform distribution (oral exposure, high dose) • Metabolism understood for >1000 micrograms per kilogram of body weight (mcg/kg) doses • Saturable (CYP2E1) conversion to glycidamide • Glutathione conjugation • Elimination occurs in hours to days • But protein binding (-SH) and potential for cumulative damage • Exposure duration affects neurotoxic dose
1. Toxicokinetics data needs • Bioavailability of acrylamide from food • Dose-response for toxicity, disposition, and binding • Dose metrics, critical events, mode of action • DNA to hemoglobin adduct relationship • DNA and protein binding as a marker of toxicity and risk • Significant nuclear protiens • Toxicokinetics of acrylamide in humans • Risk factors for susceptibility
1. Plans for Toxicokinetics data development • FDA – National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR) • DNA/protein adduct characterization and their relationship to effects and relevant external dose levels • Bioavailability • CDC – National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) • Biomarker-intake relationship in studies prior to NHANES • Acrylamide monomer industry • Human dosing study, PbPk model development
2. What we know for cancer • 2-year rat studies show cancer • Drinking water exposures, high doses • Epidemiology not sufficient to change conclusions or weight of evidence
2. Carcinogenicity data needs • Cancer epidemiology in populations of known high exposure • Chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study • Acrylamide and glycidamide in rat and mouse • Review histology slides from existing bioassays using updated diagnostic criteria • Investigate the mechanism of thyroid tumor induction as reported in existing bioassays
2. FDA carcinogenicity study plans:intermediate to long term • FDA nominated acrylamide and glycidamide to the National Toxicology Program as priority selections • Chronic carcinogenicity and mechanism • NCTR will conduct these studies • FDA will participate in all experimental protocol designs to assure regulatory needs are met
2 . FDA carcinogenicity study plansshorter term • Mechanistic studies, including bioavailability and markers of exposure and effect • DNA and protein adducts caused by acrylamide • Adducts are reaction products between a chemical and either DNA or proteins • Adducts can tell us • How much exposure occurs and • Help us understand the toxicology • Adducts may be particularly useful in relating animal toxicity studies to potential risks for humans from acrylamide
3. Neurotoxicity • High dose exposures in occupational settings causes neurotoxicity in humans • Effect widely studied, multiple species • Cumulative dose important • Age-related effects • One study showed more rapid onset of neurotoxicity in young vs old animals • Another showed greater response for neurotransmitter effects in younger animals • But very little data overall
3. Neurotoxicity data needs • Further evaluation of interaction between dose and duration • Improve weight-of-evidence for or against neurodevelopmental effects at food-acrylamide doses • Establish a NOAEL for relevant endpoints
3. Plans for neurotoxicity study • FDA – plans are being developed for • Inclusion of neurotoxicity endpoints in NTP study • Study of neurodevelopment • Ongoing academic research into mechanism of neurotoxicity
4. Reproductive/ developmental effects (other than neurotoxicity) • Decreased body weight, but no structural malformations • Reduced litter sizes (5000 mcg/kg treatment of males) • Germ cell mutagen in animals at high, injected doses • Genetic effects in mice (injection >40,000 mcg/kg) • Specific-locus mutations • Heritable or reciprocal transformations • Unscheduled DNA synthesis in spermatids,chromosomal aberrations or micronuclei frequency in spermatogenic cells
4. Reproductive/ developmental effects data needs • Epidemiology for germ cell toxicity • Expression profiling for genotoxic effects on somatic and germ cells • Define the germ cell mutations generated • Dose-response • Low dose and multiple dose exposure effects • Compare food and drinking water exposures • Mechanistic • Adduct formation with DNA and significant nuclear proteins • Dominant lethal study in CYP2E1 knockout mice
4. Plans for Reproductive/ developmental effects study • FDA • Genotoxicity endpoints in NTP study, including initial subchronic studies (under development) • Workshop for germ cell mutagen risk assessment • NIOSH worker studies • NIEHS collaboration for reproductive/genotox • NIEHS evaluation of CYP2E1 knockout mice for dominant lethal effect • Expert review panel by National Toxicology Program (NTP) Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR)
5. Safety/risk assessmentUSEPA RfD and USFDA ADI • EPA Reference dose and FDA Acceptable Daily Intake based on Burek et al 1980 finding of sciatic nerve degeneration (electron microscopic) • 90 day study in rats • Lowest observed effect level 1000 mcg/kg • No observed effect level 200 mcg/kg • Only 3 animals examined at EM level per dose group • Recovery seen at 144 days for LOAEL dose • 1000 fold uncertainty factor • Routine EPA re-evaluation of RfD underway
5. WHO/FAO Safety/risk assessment • Noncancer effects judged unlikely at doses from food • Cancer • No consensus on quantification of risk • Carcinogenic potency characterized as • …similar to that of other carcinogens in food (benzo[a]pyrene and heterocyclic aromatic amines) …” • However, • “… intake levels for acrylamide are likely to be higher.”
WHO/FAO conclusion “major concern” for acrylamide based on relative cancer potency and uncertainty regarding germ cell mutagenicity findings.
Safety/risk assessment - Effective dose, Exposure, ADI • Lowest neurotoxic dose in rats • 1000 mcg per kg body weight • No effect seen at200 mcg/kg • WHO/FAO – typical dietary intake • 0.3-0.8 mcg/kg body weight • FDA Acceptable Daily Intake for food contact decisions • 1000 fold uncertainty factor • 0.2 mcg/kg body weight
Summary • Acrylamide causes effects in animals and in humans at doses much higher than those we get through food • However, safety/risk assessment indicates the need for further analysis of the risk • There are substantial gaps in our knowledge of whether the acrylamide levels in food are likely to cause health effects • Data gap analyses by leading experts in a variety of venues in the last 7 months indicate what kind of information is needed • We have initiated programs to carry out the needed information gathering and research, and are already seeing results