1 / 28

Improving Efficiency of Military Installations Management & Relocation

Improving Efficiency of Military Installations Management & Relocation. 28 October, 2009. Ministry of Nation Defense Republic of Korea, MINISTRY OF STRATEGY AND FINANCE, Ministry of Public Administration and Security , Ministry of Environment Republic of Korea ,

raquel
Download Presentation

Improving Efficiency of Military Installations Management & Relocation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Improving Efficiency of Military Installations Management & Relocation 28 October, 2009 Ministry of Nation Defense Republic of Korea, MINISTRY OF STRATEGY AND FINANCE, Ministry of Public Administration and Security, Ministry of Environment Republic of Korea, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, Presidential Council on National Competitiveness

  2. Table of Contents Ⅰ Background Ⅱ Deregulation of Military Installations Protection Zone Ⅲ Improving Efficiency of Military Installations Relocation Projects Ⅳ Expected Results Ⅴ Action Plan 1

  3. Ⅰ Background 2

  4. Background Changes in National Defense Environment Many Military Installations Expected To Be Relocated By 2020 in Accordance With Defense Reform Program. Standards for Setting up Military Installations & Protection Zone Required As Operational Environment Changes Civilian-Military Tension Over Military Installations Requests for Deregulation of Military Installations Protection Zone have repeatedly been filed even after drastic reduction of the zone in accordance with the amendment of “Military Installation & Military Facilities Act” in Sep. 2008. Disconnection btw Local Urban Projects & Military Installations Relocation Plan Plan “To Rationalize Restriction on Protection Zone” & “To Improve Efficiency of Military Installations Project” Necessary to Revitalize Local Economy & to Ensure Timely Relocation of Military Installations

  5. Ⅱ Deregulation of Military Installations Protection Zone 4

  6. Conflict of Different Values Over Military Installations Protection Zone National Defense vs. Citizens’Rights National Defense Citizens’Rights Military Operations Property Rights Military Installations Protection Living Quality Safety Zone Near Munitions Storage Free Business Activities Flight Safety For Military Aircraft Efficient Use of Territory

  7. 2. Status of Military Installations Protection Zone Total of9,111㎢ (9.1% of Entire Territory) Tightly Restricted Protection Zone 19% Gangwon-Do 35% Etc. 23% Flight Safety Zone Inchon3% 34% Chung Nam 5% Restricted Protection Zone 47% Gyunggi-Do 34% By Types By Local Gov’ts

  8. 3. Efforts to Improve Military Installations Protection Zone Deregulation Through Reduction of Protection Zone(Sep. 2008) Reduction of Controlled Protection Zone Near MDL 15km 10km Reduction of Restricted Protection Zone In Rear Area 1km 0.5km MDL Civilian Restricted Line Controlled Protection Line 500m 10km Base/Installations 1km 15km Restricted Protection Line ※ Easing & Releasing Additional 4.04 million ㎡ of Protection Zone(Oct.2009) Easing Restriction on Construction Within Protection Zone New Construction/Enlargement of Residence Within Controlled Protection Zone (BannedPossible Upon Consultation With Military) Small-scale Construction Within Restricted Protection Zone (Military Consultation Required Not Required Any More)

  9. 4. Problems with Military Installations Protection Zone Inflexible Standard, Lack of Procedure to Assess Suitability of Protection Zone Tendency to Set Up Protection Zone Around Unit Boundary Identical Height Restriction For Every Military Air Base Lack of Suitability Verification Process For Protection Zone Unclear Standard For Consultation on Development Activities Within Protection Zone & Lack of Local Communities’ Participation Difficult to Consult Military Units Due to Lack of Standard For Setting Up Protection Zone, Too Many Requests and Conditions to Local Communities Excessive Restriction On Military Installations of Less Operational Importance Within Protection Zone Low Participation Rate of Local Communities & Stake-holders

  10. 5. Improving System of Military Installations Protection Zone Reasonable Reduction of Protection Zone Improve Standard For Setting Up Protection Zone Future Present Protection Zone Around Boundary Protection Zone Around Core Installations Boundary Fence Boundary Fence 500m 500m General Installations Core Installations General Installations Core Installations Core Installations Categorize Risk Level Based Upon Firing Zone & Munitions Target Zone, Prepare Separate Standard For Protection Zone Set-Up Protection Zone Set Up Within 1km from Range Boundary Fence Review Flight Safety Zone Height Restriction Through Scientific Means (i.e. simulation, etc) Set Up Regular Verification Session For Suitability of Protection Zone During Establishing Protection Zone Plan

  11. 5. Improving System of Military Installations Protection Zone Improve Consultation Procedure Regarding Development Activities Within Protection Zone Prepare Reasonable Consultation Standard For Construction of Military Installations By Type Present Future Deregulate Protection Zone Around Military Installations of Less Operational Importance Lack of Standard For Assessing Operational Importance of Installations Prepare Clear Definition of “Conditional Agreement” For Development Activities Within Protection Zone Allow Construction of Non-Residential Installations Within Safety Zone Near Munitions Storage Prepare Permissible Standard For Building Temporary Installations (i.e. Temporary Material, Tower Crane, etc) Guarantee Participation of Concerning Local Government Officials During Verification By ‘Unit Protection Zone Inspection Committee’ Continuously Expand Zone Where Construction Can Be Approved By Local Communities Without Consultation With Military 10

  12. Ⅲ Improving Efficiency of Military Installations Relocation Project 11 11

  13. 1. Status of Military Installations Relocation Project Relocation Method Result of Relocation Project(’04~’08) Reason for Relocation Finance Living Discomforts Military Purpose 4% National Defense/Military Installations Relocation Project To Be Processed Using “Ad-Hoc Finance” 42% 54% Land Sales Revenue Tax Revenue Ad-Hoc Finance Tax Expenditure Relocation Cost Local Development Donation & Concession Time Period (4.8yrs on average) Alternative Installations To Be Constructed By Parties Concernedand Be Donated to Military Existing Land To Be Independently Developed By Parties Concerned More Than 10 yrs Less Than 5 yrs 5~ 10yrs 58% 38% 4% Donate (Alternative Installations) Local Community, Contractor, etc Military Financial Project: 42projects Donation & Concession: 53projects Concede (Existing Land) 12

  14. 2. Change In Internal Military Environment(Present2020) Combine Military Installations In Accordance With National Defense Reform Plan Relocation of Military Installations Military Reorganization Reduction of Military Posts Plan to Combine Nationally Dispersed Military Installations To Form Operation or Mission LevelUnits Sell Urban Military Posts Form Large-Scale Units to Minimize Required Land Size Confidential Contents Reduction of Land Size of Army Posts 30% to be sold 1,827 posts 856 posts Approx. 280 million㎡ Approx. 200 million ㎡ 70% 13

  15. 3. Problems in Military Installations Relocation Project Necessity of Overarching Theme No Comprehensive Strategy & Plan For Military Installations Relocation Lack of Prior Consultation With Local Governments When Forming Military Installations Relocation Plan -> City Development Plan Not Reflected In Military Installations Relocation Plan Resistance/Non cooperation from Local Governments (i.e. Special Warfare Command, Jeju Naval Base, etc) Military Installations Considered Detrimental Due to Possible Imposition of New Restrictions Too Many Requests (i.e. Support For Numerous Local Development Projects) From Local Governments In Exchange For Accepting Military Installations Inefficient Project Management Tendency To Construct Surplus Military Installations When Using Donation & Concession Method Inadequate Post Sales Revenue Could Lead to Project Failure Delay of Administrative Procedure & Low Participation Rate of Local Community Complicated Military Consultation Procedure Consultation Delayed(2~5yrs) Tension With Local Community 14

  16. 4. Improving Efficiency of Military Installations Relocation Project Establish Master Plan for Military Unit Relocation Establish ‘Comprehensive Development Plan To Relocate & Support Military Installations’by Dec. 2009 Prepare Mid/Long-term Program Up To 2020 Combine Dispersed Military Installations to Form Expandable Large-Scale Units to Minimize Required For Military Installations & to Improve Management Efficiency Present Future(2020) Continue To Be Utilized Future Placement Combined Operation/Mission- Level Units Dispersed Around Territory 15

  17. Distance 4. Improving Efficiency of Military Installations Relocation Project Combine Dispersed Military Installations For Management Efficiency Present Residence Unit B Barrack Training Field Parade Ground Unit A Unit C Barrack Barrack Distance Parade Ground Maintenance Shop Parade Ground Training Field Residence Residence Barracks Dispersed Among Units & Separate Use of Parade Ground Long Distance btw Units & Training Fields Contributes to Living Discomforts of Local People Dispersed Small-scale Residence 16

  18. 4. Improving Efficiency of Military Installations Relocation Project Combine Dispersed Military Installations For Management Efficiency Future A,B,C Units Combined Barrack Subsidiary Installations Training Field Parade Ground Combined Residence Combine Barracks & Joint Use of Parade Ground Locate Training Field Near Units, Build Large-Scale Residential Complex Minimize Required For Military Installations Through Combining Units -> Efficient Unit Management 17

  19. 4. Improving Efficiency of Military Installations Relocation Project Local Friendly Relocation of Military Unit Installations Develop Existing Land In a Way To Contribute to Local Development Actively Utilize Existing Land to Improve Citizens’ Quality of Life & Competency of City Through Building Diverse Residential Area & Eco-friendly Energy Installations Sell Idle Military Land To Meet Budget For Military Installations Relocation Project Develop Project Land In Connection With Local Development Plan Actively Consider Opinions of Experts & Local Residents During Relocation Planning Reflect Military Unit Relocation Plan In Local Development Plan 18

  20. 4. Improving Efficiency of Military Installations Relocation Project Two Cases of Utilizing Existing Land For Cultural & Residential Development of Local Communities Old Defense Security Command Site(Jongro-Gu, Seoul) Seoul Branch of National Modern Museum Old Army Logistics Command Site(Busan City) Residential Area & Park 19

  21. 4. Improving Efficiency of Military Installations Relocation Project Local Friendly Management of Military Installations With Local Community’s Participation Apply Public Design Concept To Military Installations Utilize Ranges As Tourist Attraction Apply Public Design Concept to Installations (i.e. boundary fence, guardhouse) Adjacent To Outside Include Ranges As Part of Local Tourist Attractions Open Up Military Amenities To Local People Easy Access of Local Community to Military Amenities Welfare Facilities Military Hospital Indoor Court 20

  22. 4. Improving Efficiency of Military Installations Relocation Project Maximize Business Value Through Reducing Scale of Installations & Expanding Business Connection Construct Minimum-Level Military Installations (Prevent Excessive Investment Through Standardizing Military Installations & Cost) Manage Budget Through Combining Highly-Profitable & Lowly-Profitable Projects Secure Budget for “Ad-hoc Finance” & Smooth Business Secure Sales Revenue of Military Land (Reclassify Land Based Upon Current Land Status) Actively Utilize Land Bank’s Emergency Land, National Forrest Actively Utilize Outside Contractors For Purchase/Sales of Military Land(Contract out to KLHC, etc.) 21 21

  23. 4. Improving Efficiency of Military Installations Relocation Project Expand Support For Local Governments & Contractors To Promote Relocation Project Diversify Measures to Support Local Communities Hosting Military Installations Connect Local Development Project With Military Installations Relocation Project Government Will Provide Local Communities With Financial/Administrative Support Necessary To Build City Infrastructure Support Local Communities With Construction of Undesirable Infrastructure (i.e. Range, Munitions Storage, etc) Expand Local People Supporting Efforts Through Welfare Project, etc Ease Requirements For Local Project Approval & Reduce Cost-Sharing Burden Ease Requirements for Any Local Project Approval (Approval For Private Use of River/Road, Approval For Development Activities, etc) Reduce Cost-Sharing Burden of Local Community (Conservation Cost for Limited Development District, etc) 22

  24. 4. Improving Efficiency of Military Installations Relocation Project Simplify Administrative Procedure & Establish Civilian-Military Cooperation System Reduce Project Period Through Simplifying Inter-Agency Consultation Procedure & Intra-Military Review Process : 2~5 yrs → 6 months MOSF, MOE, MLTM, etc MOSF, MOE, MLTM, etc Other Administration Agencies Other Administration Agencies Apply HQ of Each Service MND MND Ops Command Apply Approve Unit HQ of Each Service Ops Command Unit Approve Establish Consultative System With Local Community On Military Installations Preempt Tension In Advance Through Civilian-Military Consultative Body Expand Cooperation Through Opinions Exchange Btw MND and Local Government 23

  25. Ⅳ Expected Results 24 24

  26. Expected Results Local People Ease Restrictions On Military Installations to Guarantee Exercise of Citizens’ Property Rights and Improve Quality of Life National Defense For Citizens Establish Development In Harmony With Military Installations Local Gov’t Guarantee Military-Friendly Environment Smooth Execution of Military Installations Relocation Projects Military Ease Tension With Local Community, Improve Civilian-Military Relationship 25

  27. Ⅴ Action Plan 26 26

  28. Action Plan Establish Proper System within MND(by 2010) Operate MND Organization Exclusively In Charge of Military Installations Relocation Project by 2010 Establish Military Installations Relocation Inspection Committee Amend Relevant Laws by Sep. 2010 Act on National Defense & Military Installations Project , Act on Special Accounts for National Defense & Military Installations Relocation, Local Tax Actetc Establish Relocation Plan & Conduct Pilot Project Form Comprehensive Plan for Military Installationsby End of 2009 Find & Move Forward With Pilot Project on Military Installations Relocationby 2nd Half of 2010 27

More Related