1 / 6

ECO 435 – Natural Monopoly Problem

ECO 435 – Natural Monopoly Problem. David Loomis. Fundamental Goal of Regulation. To mimic a competitive market outcome even when the underlying market is not competitive “other goals” Fair and just rates Specific policies regulators believe to be in customers’ best interests

ravi
Download Presentation

ECO 435 – Natural Monopoly Problem

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ECO 435 – Natural Monopoly Problem David Loomis

  2. Fundamental Goal of Regulation • To mimic a competitive market outcome even when the underlying market is not competitive • “other goals” • Fair and just rates • Specific policies regulators believe to be in customers’ best interests • Universal service • Affordability • Economic development

  3. Competitive Ideal • Maximizes the sum of consumer and producer surplus • Productive and allocative efficiency

  4. Factors that Preclude a Competitive Outcome • Natural Monopoly • Firms builds pipeline costing $365 million with capacity of 1 million cubic meters; has to repay $36.5 million/yr • If it transports 100 cubic meters per day, AC=$1,001/cubic meter • If it transports 1,000 cubic meters per day, AC=$101/cubic meter • Also AC of building pipe decreases as size of pipe increases/cost=circumference, production=volume • Barriers to entry

  5. Other Complicating Factors • Uncertainty about costs – imperfect information • Other regulatory interventions – Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) – increasing costs

  6. B&T 2.1, 2.2 and 2.5 • See Notes

More Related