200 likes | 216 Views
Chapter six: Social Groups and Formal Organizations. Chapter Overview. Social Groups Bureaucracies. Group Dynamics. Aggregates and Categories (What is not a group). Aggregate – People who temporarily share a space but don’t see themselves as belonging together
E N D
Chapter six: Social Groups and Formal Organizations
Chapter Overview • Social Groups • Bureaucracies • Group Dynamics
Aggregates and Categories (What is not a group) • Aggregate – People who temporarily share a space but don’t see themselves as belonging together • Category- People who share common characteristics
Social Groups • Social Groups • Two or more people • Interact in patterned ways • Feeling of unity • Shared interests
Primary Groups – Charles Cooley referred to primary groups as “the springs of life” Essential to our emotional well being Tend to be smaller than other groups Very impersonal We can be our true self Enduring Relationship focus: “END-IN-ITSELF” Social Groups
Secondary Groups People come together on the basis of a mutual interest More formal than primary groups Often large Members interact on the basis of statuses Fail to meet the need for intimacy Weak ties Temporary Relationship focus: “MEANS-TO-END” Social Groups
Many different voluntary associations today in the United States Organized on Basis of Mutual Interest The Inner Circle and Iron Law of Oligarchy How organizations come to be dominated by a self-perpetuating elite. Social Groups (Voluntary Associations)
In-Groups – People feel a loyalty towards their in-groups Out-Groups – People of the in-group dislike out-groups Positive consequence of in-groups: People feel a sense of belonging Loyalty Negative consequence of in-groups and out-groups: Intense rivalries can develop “We vs. Them” mentality Ethnocentrism Social Groups
Reference Groups – Groups that we use to evaluate ourselves Reference Groups will change as we go through the life course Socialization Comparison “RELATIVE DEPRIVATION” "RELATIVE GRATIFICATION" Social Groups
People Connect Online Online Chat Rooms Can be impersonal and fail to meet the needs of intimacy Social Groups (Electronic Communities)
Social Networks • People who are linked to one another through friends, family, acquaintances, etc. • A bank of social relationships • It is like a snowball effect • Milgram Study 1967 • “Small World Phenomenon” • Criticisms • J. Kleinfeld replicated the research (2002) • Socially Diverse Society
Five Characteristics of Bureaucracies Clear Cut Levels (Hierarchy) Division of Labor Written Rules Written Communication and Records Impersonality Bureaucracies (Weber)
Take on a Life of their Own Suffers from Goal Displacement –When the old goal is reached in a bureaucracy and a new goal is created to keep the bureaucracy running Rationalization of Society Bureaucracies with so many rules, regulations, and emphasis on results, would increasingly take over our lives. Red Tape Bureaucratic Alienation Marx—Worker’s Alienation Weber—Iron Cage Perpetuation of Bureaucracies
How groups influence us and how we affect groups Dyads – Two people Most intense or intimate of all groups Most unstable Triads – Three People Interaction becomes less intense and intimate Stronger and more stable As a group increases in size it becomes more formal and more stable Coalitions may begin to form Greater Diffusion of Responsibility may occur in larger groups – “Someone else will take care of it” As a group gets larger, smaller groups may form Groupthink may occur- collective tunnelvision Darley & Latane (Diffusion of Responsibility) Group Dynamics
Leaders are People Who Influence Others’ Behaviors, Opinions, and Attitudes Instrumental Leader – a leader who keeps the group on track towards meeting its goals Expressive Leader – tries to life the groups morale through motivation (can also be an instrumental leader) Leadership –Two Types of Leaders
Authoritarian – One who gives orders and instructions with little to no information Democractic –Tried to gain a group consensus Lassiez-Faire – Totally hands off leader, lets the group lead The leadership style will change as the situation changes Leadership – Three Leadership Styles
Asch and Milgram Studies Asch study • Studied the effects of peer pressure • Used a set of cards • 6 stooges and a non-stooge Milgram study • Studied the affects of authority figures • Teacher and a learner • Controversial experiment
Conformity and Group Decision Making Groupthink • Decision making that ignores alternate solutions in order to maintain group harmony