1 / 20

B hadron masses and branching ratios at CDF

B hadron masses and branching ratios at CDF. Saverio D’Auria, University of Glasgow For the CDF collaboration. Contents. Trigger types at CDF Masses at CDF Results on mass measurements: B  ,B 0 B s L b Branching fractions at CDF Results on branching fractions: B s  D s p

raymond-anderson
Download Presentation

B hadron masses and branching ratios at CDF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. B hadron masses and branching ratios at CDF Saverio D’Auria, University of Glasgow For the CDF collaboration International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  2. Contents • Trigger types at CDF • Masses at CDF • Results on mass measurements: • B,B0 • Bs • Lb • Branching fractions at CDF • Results on branching fractions: • Bs Dsp • Lb  Lp • B  h+h- • Conclusions and prospective analyses Related talks: S. Farrington: B lifetime and Flavour tagging at CDF (HF) S. Giagu: Results on CP violation from CDF (CP) J. Thom: Rare Charm decays from CDF (RareDecays) T. Shears: Bottom and Charm quark production in CDF (QCD) C. Ginsburg: CDF run-II muon detector system (DDH) G. Bolla: Commissioning, operations and first results of the CDF run-II-a Silicon (DDH) International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  3. Introduction Integrated Luminosity Used in this analysis: COT tracking chamber, XFTrigger (1/pT) ~ 0.1% GeV –1; (hit)~150m dE/dx K-p separation is 1.3 s at pt > 2GeV/c Silicon detector, SVTrigger: 5 Layers, i.p. resolution 30 mm, SVT International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  4. Trigger types • B-Physics at CDF is based on 3 trigger types: • di-lepton trigger (“J/Y”) • two tracks with d0 > 120mm (“2-Track Trigger”) • lepton + track with impact parameter > 120mm (“lepton+SVT”) }Used here SVT: 33mm beam  35mm res. International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  5. Masses at CDF The di-lepton trigger has a large statistics of fully reconstructed B decays Mass scale calibrated on J/Y, check performed on Y’ and Y(1S) dE/dx: use GEANT description Material adjustment Magnetic field: +0.165% International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  6. Mass measurements: results Analysis cuts: J/Y mass window: ±80 MeV K0* mass window: ±80 MeV Decay length (B): >100 mm Pt (B) > 6.5 GeV Analysis cuts: J/Y mass window: ±80 MeV Pt(K±) : > 2 GeV Decay length (B): >100 mm Pt (B) > 6.5 GeV International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  7. Mass measurements: results Analysis cuts: J/Y mass window: ±80 MeV F mass window: ±10 MeV Decay length (Bs): >100 mm Pt (Bs) > 6.5 GeV Analysis cuts: J/Y mass window: ±80 MeV L mass window: ±15 MeV Decay length (Lb): >100 mm Pointing cut: cos qB> 0.95 International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  8. Mass measurements: summary MeV Main sources of systematic errors • Prospects: • what can we do with more statistics • Systematic error will decrease: correct for smaller effects • Statistical error will scale with integrated Luminosity: mass differences • Mass of other Meson, Baryons will be measured. International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  9. Ratios of Branching Fractions • Uncertainties on b cross section (+ 9% c.m. Energy) • Systematic effects on trigger efficiency • Rely on other measurements for • Production fractions fx allow for measurement in future • Branching ratio of control mode • Branching fractions to daughter’s daughters • Fully reconstructed decays from the “Two-Track Trigger” stream Branching fractions at CDF e.g. International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  10. Branching Fractions  Normalization decay mode: Bd D p • Same mode for: • D* peak also visible. International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  11. Analysis Cuts: 2 Tracks required to be Trigger Tracks. mass constrained to PDG value First measurement: Bs Dsp Branching Fractions International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  12. Results: Branching Fraction: Bs Dsp From data fit: NBs = 44 11 (stat) 7 (sys) NB0 = 505  44 (stat)  20 (sys) From MC: R = 1.08  0.02 From PDG Rbr = 2.53  0.65 BR(Bs Dsp) = ( 4.8 1.2 1.8 0.8 0.6) 10-3 (Stat) (BR) (sys) (fs/fd) New measurement ! Previous limit set by OPAL: BR (Bs Dsp ) < 13% International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  13. First measurement: Lb Lcp p K p p Branching Fractions • “Reflections”: take a p for a p and • the control channel B0(K p p)p • has a reflection peak right under the • signal. • Use MC to parametrise the shape. • Use data to normalize the amplitude • Take into account into fitting function International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  14. Results: Branching Fraction: Lb Lcp From MC: R = 1.20  0.02 From PDG Rbr = 1.82  0.49 From data fit: NLb = 96 13 (stat) +6 –7 (sys) NB0 = 321  22 (stat)  20 (sys) New Result ! Previous observations: Delphi 3 evts Aleph 4 evts BR(Lb Lcp) = (6.0 1.0(stat)  0.8(sys)  2.1(BR) ) 10-4 International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  15. Branching Fractions: B h+ h(’)- • required to be trigger tracks. • Optimise offline Cuts on MC signal, data sideband: • Isolation: • Efficiency from data • Defined in a cone about the B axis: International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  16. Different signal contributions: Branching Fractions B h+ h(’)- Monte Carlo: • Total width due to several different contributions. • on top of each other • Disentangle using: • Invariant Mass • Relative momentum • PID { Kinematic Separation ← Most Important International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  17. Kinematic separation: Branching Fractions B h+h(’)- Monte Carlo: • Choose 2 variables: • Signal Likelihood:  Gm1,s1(ID1) Gm2,s2(ID2) International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  18. Present Results: Branching Fractions B h+h(’)- Consistent with no CPV Using B-factories average for BR(BdKp) = (18.5  0.1) 10-6 We obtain: BR(Bdp+p-) = (4.81  2.05  1.02) 10-6 [Heavy Flavor Averaging Group] Yields: Ratio of B-factories average: International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  19. e.g. Bf K Branching Fractions: forthcoming channels International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

  20. Mass and Branching ratio techniques in CDF are well established: • new channels are now available thanks to improved trigger (SVT) • Most precise measurement of Lb and Bs mass • New branching ratios have been measured: • Bs Dsp and • LbLcp • BR sensitivity: O(5 10-6) with present data. • We have just opened the lid: a large number of new measurements • will be performed in the near future. Conclusions: International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen, July 17 2003

More Related