1 / 12

On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Team Check-up Tool

On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Team Check-up Tool. Learning Objectives. To understand the tool we use to: Describe the anticipated activities of your ICU quality improvement team Track implementation progress and the context of progress Assess barriers to progress Monitor interactions on the team

raziya
Download Presentation

On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Team Check-up Tool

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. On the CUSP: STOP BSIThe Team Check-up Tool

  2. Learning Objectives • To understand the tool we use to: • Describe the anticipated activities of your ICU quality improvement team • Track implementation progress and the context of progress • Assess barriers to progress • Monitor interactions on the team • To think about how the tool can be useful to you

  3. The Quality Improvement Team • Core team working on the CUSP/ CLABSI project • The small group that spreads the intervention to the rest of the ICU

  4. Importance of the Quality Improvement Team • This team has the greatest impact on how the intervention is “rolled out” at your site (absolute power) • Potential implications of a poor job • Slower implementation • Gaps/ uneven implementation • Higher continued risk (infection, $, lives)

  5. TCT Measures: • Engagement/ educational activities of the QI team (on BSI and CUSP) • Participation in CUSP activities • Extent of implementation on unit • Barriers to progress • Interactions on team

  6. Team Activities-Keeping on Track • Team meetings (recommend 2/mo) • Review of data (monthly) • Meet w/ Exec Partner on unit (monthly or more) • Executive review of data (monthly) • Presentations to the Hospital Leadership and Board of Directors

  7. Education and Engagement Activities on the Unit • Modeling the line placement steps; stopping insertions that violate protocol; having one-on-one talks where necessary • CUSP Activities • Science of safety video • How will we harm the next patient? exercise • Daily Goals • Morning Briefing • Learning from a defect • Executive Partnership

  8. Education and Engagement Activities on the Unit • More Activities (add your ideas!) • Internal seminar for staff • Present project at all committee meetings • Make BSI prevention part of a skills fair • Have IC dept visit/ give a talk • In-services/ demos • New written policy • Post the steps and progress updates • Put the prevention practices on all clipboards • Update/ prepare line cart/ kit with checklist • Hand out Fast Facts one-page info sheet

  9. Barriers to Progress • Turnover on QI Team • Spread to other parts of the hospital • Disruptive events • Lack of skills • Lack of time • Lack of buy-in • Lack of support • Lack of autonomy

  10. Interactions among Team Members • Team agrees on goals • Team values individual contributions • Team can resolve conflicts • Team is unified

  11. Action Items • Look over the tool • Think about what elements are most important to watch • Share TCT data with executive partner • Make a strategic plan to address identified barriers early

  12. Reference List • Lubomski, Lisa H., Jill A. Marsteller, Yea-Jen Hsu, Christine A. Goeschel, Christine G. Holzmueller, and Peter J. Pronovost, “The Team Checkup Tool: Evaluating Quality Improvement Team Activities and Giving Feedback to Senior Leaders,” Joint Commission Journal of Quality and Patient Safety, October 2008. • Marsteller, Jill A., Christine G. Holzmueller, Martin Makary, J. Bryan Sexton, David Thompson, Lisa H. Lubomski and Peter J. Pronovost. “Developing Process-Support Tools for Patient Safety: Finding the Balance Between Validity and Feasibility,“ Joint Commission Journal of Quality and Patient Safety, October 2008.

More Related