210 likes | 224 Views
02/19/07. Jon S Kapustinsky, LANL Forward Vertex Detector Review BNL, 19-Feb-2007 Outline: FVTX Overall Description Sensor Details FPHX Details HDI Summary. Technical risk minimization the key driver
E N D
02/19/07 • Jon S Kapustinsky, LANL • Forward Vertex Detector Review • BNL, 19-Feb-2007 • Outline: • FVTX Overall Description • Sensor Details • FPHX Details • HDI • Summary
Technical risk minimization the key driver • Mini-strips maintain good resolution in r and phi with reasonable occupancy and manageable channel count • Wire bonds replace initial idea to use bump bonds • Chip placement moved from centerline of sensor to the edges • minimizes potential noise coupling between chip and sensor • facilitates implementation of decoupling between sensor bias and chip reference and avoids long path-length sensor return to ground • Wedge assembly unit based on ease of assembly • HDI designed to match standard industry capability • Readout architecture of the FPHX draws heavily on previously designed FPIX, which we are currently working with for the LANL LDRD Design Decisions Leading to the FVTX Sensor Wedge and FPHX
Forward Silicon Vertex Detector FVTX • Four stations of disks on each side • One small disk (~60mm) three large disks (~126mm) • Mini-strips of 75 micron radial pitch: 2.8 -11.2 mm • Wedges alternate front/back placement on disk • Custom-designed FPHX readout chip from Fermilab (Yarema et. al.) • Total strip count: 2 * 552,960 strips (zero suppressed) • Total chip count: 2 * 4320 chips
FVTX Sensor Wedge (Czech, UNM, LANL) • Sensor • 2 columns of strips • 1664 strips per column • strip length ~2.8mm to ~11.2mm • 75 micron spacing • 48 wedges per disk (7.5˚/sensor, 15˚/wedge) • 0.5 mm overlap with adjacent wedges • 2.8% occupancy (central Au-Au) • FPHX Chip • 1 column readout • 128 channels • ~ 70 microns channel spacing • Dimensions – FNAL 9mm x 1.2 mm HDI Sensor HDI Mini-strips are oriented to approximate an arc FPHX Chips (13 per column) Not to Scale
bonding pads testing pads (both staged) Guard ring Cutting edge Inner and outer wedges 4-inch wafer inner outer Vaclav Vrba, Institute of Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
Narrow and wide wedges Four inner wedges on a wafer Three outer wedges on a wafer 4-inch wafer Vaclav Vrba, Institute of Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
MATERIAL SPECIFICATION: Wafer diameter 6 inch preferred (152 mm), 4 inch (100 mm) Crystal orientation <111> or <100> Thickness 300 m +10 μm –20 μm Resistivity: 2.0 – 5.0 kohm K cm Uniformity of resistivity (wafer to wafer) 25% Passivation: Covering junction-side except for wire-bond pads and reference marks. It can either be silicon oxide or silicon nitride. • DESIGN PARAMETERS: • Devices are p-on-n mini-strips • The full design for the masks will be provided by us in electronic form, GDS file format (Czech collaborators) • Vendor will finalize the design details according to their design rules and process, and will work with us on the final design and mask layout.
Sensor Status • Two column mini-strip 7.5˚ sensor geometry chosen • Good resolution, reasonable occupancy and manageable channel count • Draft mechanical design completed (LANL/Hytec) • Based on ease of assembly • Draft sensor design completed (Czech) • Standard industry technology • Preliminary price quotes from 2 vendors (more to follow) • Micron, 6-inch • CiS, 4-inch
FPHX Chip (FNAL, LANL) All I/O pads are wire-bonded • Specifications • Signal polarity: positive (holes) • Gain at shaper output: 500 mV/fC • 3-bit ADC • Nominal peaking time: 60 ns • Noise: 150e + 140 e/pF • Power: 110 uW per channel for maximum input transistor bias current • Imax: maximum tolerable input leakage current estimate 100nA/strip (programmable)
60 nS peaking time Integrator, CR-RC shaper, ADC Input to shaper Output of shaper 150 e noise floor 140 e/pf electrons FPHX Analog (Zimmerman, FNAL) Capacitance pf 2 pf, max charge sharing, 25:1 S/N
Optimized to reduce noise coupling between sensor and readout chip Bypass cap to sensor backplane HDI ground plane Sensor FPHX R/O chips Noise canceling input signal loops Noise canceling digital supply loops Bypass cap to sensor backplane
Figure - The output Data Word FPHX digital (Hoff, FNAL) Data Push Architecture Simultaneous R/W Output up to 4 hits/event in 4 BCO’s
FPHX Status (FNAL, LANL) • Performance specifications provided by LANL to the FNAL design team • Design completed by FNAL based on specifications provided • Layout design and prototype run dependent on funding
High Density Interconnect (UNM, LANL) HDI Stack Up • HDI • 176 μm thick • 4 copper planes (ground, power, 2ea signal), 5 Kapton films, 8 glue layers GND Signal Signal Power • HDI trace count • 2 R/O lines x LVDS pair x 26 chips 104 • 4 d’load and reset lines 4 • 2 clocks x LVDS pair 4 • 1 calibration line 1 • 113 • Analog and digital power and ground on imbedded layers
HDI Status • 15˚ wedge geometry determined for HDI • Trace count defined based on FPHX design • HDI placed between the sensor and the carbon support • HDI will be designed to conform with industry standard capability • Preliminary design has been FEA modeled for thermal performance
Summary • Design decisions are driven by technical risk mitigation • standard sensor technology • readout chip based on existing design • chip and sensor assembly optimized for noise immunity • industry standard kapton HDI layout • mechanical design based on ease of assembly
Assumptions Ileak = I0 + (α x F) I0 = initial leakage current/ cm2 I0 ~ 1.8 μA/cm3 55nA/cm2 (scaled from 500 nA per 1x8 BteV tile) For a FVTX strip that is 1.3cm x .0075 cm x .03 cm = 3 x 10-4 cm3, I0 ~ 0.54 nA/strip α = damage constant ~ 2.5 x 10-17A/cm F = total fluence ~ 2 x 1013/cm2 (~500kRad) Ileak = 1.8 μA/cm3 + (2.5 x 10-17A/cm x 2 x 1013/cm2) = 52 μA/cm3 Istrip = 52 μA/cm3 x (3 x 10-4 cm3) = 15.6 nA/strip All the above is at room temperature Ileak(T2) = Ileak(T1) {T2/T1}2 exp {-E/2k(T1-T2/T1T2)} Temperatures in degrees Kelvin E + 1.2 ev K is the Boltzmann constant, 8.617 x 10-5 ev/K At 0 degrees celsius, the leakage current would be reduced by ~ a factor of 7 None of the above accounts for annealing between run periods