1 / 13

μ- Capture, Energy Rotation, Cooling and High-pressure Cavities

μ- Capture, Energy Rotation, Cooling and High-pressure Cavities. David Neuffer Fermilab. 0utline. Motivation Study 2AP Neutrino factory … Muon Collider, … “High-frequency” Buncher and  Rotation Study 2Ap scenario, obtains up to ~0.2 /p Integrate cooling into phase-energy rotation

reba
Download Presentation

μ- Capture, Energy Rotation, Cooling and High-pressure Cavities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. μ-Capture, Energy Rotation, Cooling and High-pressure Cavities David Neuffer Fermilab

  2. 0utline • Motivation • Study 2AP Neutrino factory … • Muon Collider, … • “High-frequency” Buncher and  Rotation • Study 2Ap scenario, obtains up to ~0.2 /p • Integrate cooling into phase-energy rotation • Gas-Cavity Variations • Cooling in bunching and phase rotation • Higher gradient, lower frequency ??? • Shorter system, fewer bunches • Optimization …. • Polarization • Use high gradient rf near target to improve polarization

  3. Advantages of high-pressure cavities • high gradient rf • In magnetic fields B=1.75T, or more … • With beam • Change cavity frf by  • Can Integrate cooling with capture • Capture and phase-energy rotation + cooling • Can get high-gradient at low frequencies (30, 50, 100 MHz ???) • Beam manipulations • Polarization Research can be funded…

  4. Study2A Dec. 2003June2004 • Drift –110.7m • Bunch -51m • V’ = 3(z/LB) + 3 (z/LB)2 MV/m (× 2/3) (85MV total) • (1/) =0.0079 • -E Rotate – 52m – (416MV total) • 12 MV/m (×2/3) • P1=280 , P2=154V = 18.032 • Match and cool (100m) • V’ = 15 MV/m (× 2/3) • P0 =214 MeV/c • 0.75 m cells, 0.02m LiH

  5. Study2AP June 2004 scenario • Drift –110.7m • Bunch -51m • V(1/) =0.0079 • 12 rf freq., 110MV • 330 MHz  230MHz • -E Rotate – 54m –(416MV total) • 15 rf freq. 230 202 MHz • P1=280 , P2=154NV = 18.032 • Match and cool (80m) • 0.75 m cells, 0.02m LiH • “Realistic” fields, components • Fields from coils • Be windows included

  6. Simplest Modification • Add gas + higher gradient to obtain cooling within rotator • ~300MeV energy loss in cooling region • Rotator is 51m; • Need ~6MeV/m H2 Energy loss • 9MeV/m if cavities occupy 2/3 • ~30% Liquid H2 density • Alternating Solenoid lattice in rotator • 21MV/m rf • Try shorter system … Cool here

  7. Short bunch train option • Drift (20m), Bunch–20m (100 MV) • Vrf = 0 to 15 MV/m ( 2/3) • P1 at 205.037, P2=130.94 • N = 5.0 • Rotate – 20m (200MV) • N = 5.05 • Vrf = 15 MV/m ( 2/3) • Palmer Cooler up to 100m • Match into ring cooler • ICOOL results • 0.12 /p within 0.3 cm • Could match into ring cooler (C~40m) (~20m train) 40m 60m 95m

  8. FFAG-influenced variation – 100MHz • 100 MHz example • 90m drift; 60m buncher, 40m rf rotation • Capture centered at 250 MeV • Higher energy capture means shorter bunch train • Beam at 250MeV ± 200MeV accepted into 100 MHz buncher • Bunch widths < ±100 MeV • Uses ~ 400MV of rf

  9. Lattice Variations (50Mhz example) Example I (250 MeV) • Uses ~90m drift + 100m 10050 MHz rf (<4MV/m) ~300MV total • Captures 250200 MeV’s into 250 MeV bunches with ±80 MeV widths Example II (125 MeV) • Uses ~60m drift + 90m 10050 MHz rf (<3MV/m) ~180MV total • Captures 125100 MeV’s into 125 MeV bunches with ±40 MeV widths

  10. Polarization for μ+-μ- Colliders • Start with short proton bunch on target < ~1ns • Before π⇒μ+ν decay, use low-frequency rf to make beam more monochromatic • ~50MV in ~5m? • Drift to decay (~10m?) • Higher energy μ’s pol. + • Lower energy μ’s pol. – • ¼ Phase-Energy rotation • ~10m • Rebunch at ~2× frequency • +’s in one bunch • -’s in other bunch + - + -

  11. Summary • High-frequency Buncher and E Rotator (ν-Factory) improved (?) with high-pressure cavities • Shorter systems • Lower Frequency (fewer bunches). • μ+-μ- Colliders … • Polarization … To do: • Optimizations, Best Scenario, cost/performance …

  12. Current Status (New Scientist) (or μ+-μ- Collider)

  13. DoE/NSF today …

More Related