1 / 14

Development of S tandard Reagents for WNV NAT

Development of S tandard Reagents for WNV NAT. M. Rios, A. Grinev, K. Sirnivasan, O. Wood, S. Daniel, I. Hewlett CBER/FDA. WNV Human Disease Cases in Six Outbreaks 1999-2004 in the U.S. 2002 : documented Human to Human transmission

red
Download Presentation

Development of S tandard Reagents for WNV NAT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Development of Standard Reagents for WNV NAT M. Rios, A. Grinev, K. Sirnivasan, O. Wood, S. Daniel, I. Hewlett CBER/FDA

  2. WNV Human Disease Casesin Six Outbreaks 1999-2004 in the U.S. • 2002 : documented Human to Human transmission • transfusion, transplantation, breast feeding & transplacental • Public health concern: DHHS, State Dept Public Health, Blood community, and test kit manufacturers - screening assays

  3. Chronology of Assays • Biological assays: • In vivo: intracerebral injections in mice • In vitro infectivity: Cytopathic effect (CPE) Plaque assays (PFU) • Serological assays: • ELISA; MAC-ELISA, PRNT • Short asymptomatic acute phase need to be detected by nucleic acid assays: PCR, TMA, etc

  4. Need for Standards • Lack of consensus for viral titer • Viral titer has been defined in plaque forming units (PFU) • Number of viral particles per PFU has broad range (1 – 1000 virions) • Need for correlation of RNA copies with PFU • Non-infectious particles (defective) may be detected by NAT but not by infectivity assays

  5. Reagent Standardization • Consensus in viral titers: • Determination of copy number is necessary to define analytical sensitivity and fulfill regulatory requirements • Animal isolates were available • Needed to include both animal and human strains • Potential for genetic variation • Genetic characterization of isolates to be used in the panel

  6. FDA WNV NAT Panels • Genetic characterization • NY99 (flamingo) isolate from CDC – available during assay development • FDA-Hu2002 isolated at the FDA • Characterization of viral stocks • PFU – at both FDA and NY Dept. of Health Lab. and by cytopathic assays at FDA (TCID50) • Measurement of RNA copy number • Using intermediate dilutions sent to 4 laboratories who had quantitative assay • The final panel specification were to be defined in collaborative studies on prototype panel formulated with heat inactivated stocks

  7. Viral Titer Determination Copies/mL

  8. Correlation Between Copies/mL and PFU/mL * Assay were performed in two independent laboratories

  9. Genetic Characterization of FDA-Hu2002 Isolate (AY646354) Comparing to NY99 flamingo isolate (AF 196835) Previously observed mutations In red: Hu 2001 (AF533540) In green: Hu 2001 (AF533540) and Hu 2002 TX (AY289214)

  10. Reagent Characterization Summary • Both NY99-FDA and FDA-Hu2002 stocks have a viral titer of 1010 copies/mL • The PFU titers at both NY State Dept of Health Laboratory and at the FDA were 2.5 logs lower then the RNA copy numbers • Heat treatment of the virus results in loss of infectivity by PFU and 2 to 3 log reduction of copy number as determined by TaqMan

  11. WNV Panel Formulation and Evaluation in Collaborative Studies • Panel formulated using both NY99-FDA and FDA-Hu2002 strains • composed of 14 coded members (1000, 500, 100, 50, 10, 5 and 0 viral copies/mL, one from each isolate) • Distributed to 7 independent laboratories • Results reported to FDA

  12. Panel Evaluation: Results The seven participant laboratories performed 12 different assays on the panel Results of the 12 different assays on the panel Only one assay had 2 false positive results in the 0 copies panel member

  13. Panel Evaluation in Collaborative Studies • Great variability of results with low copy number panel members • Qualitative assays performed better than quantitative assays • A second round of testing was needed for evaluation of viral quantification - statistical analysis ongoing • Stability studies: panel stable for at least 17 months at 4oC – further studies ongoing

  14. Analytical sensitivity • FDA’s current standard for WNV NAT assays is 100 copies/ml for the individual donation • Standard may be revised as assay sensitivity improves and additional data on viremia and infectivity become available in future studies

More Related