1 / 16

Carleton Centre for Community Innovation Report on Social Metrics  Key Informant Interviews

Carleton Centre for Community Innovation Report on Social Metrics  Key Informant Interviews. Dr. Tessa Hebb, 3ci, Carleton University Social Finance Connects: Social Metrics, Outcome Evaluation and Social Return on Investment HRSDC & Socialfinance.ca Webinar January 31 st 2013.

reed-boyd
Download Presentation

Carleton Centre for Community Innovation Report on Social Metrics  Key Informant Interviews

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Carleton Centre for Community Innovation Report on Social Metrics Key Informant Interviews Dr. Tessa Hebb, 3ci, Carleton University Social Finance Connects: Social Metrics, Outcome Evaluation and Social Return on Investment HRSDC & Socialfinance.ca Webinar January 31st 2013

  2. Presentation Overview • 3ci survey • Understanding social metrics • What social metric tools are used • Common barriers to using social metrics • Stakeholders in the process • Standardization and the role of government in social metrics development.

  3. The 3ci Survey • Thirty one organizations in the survey drawn from business sector, social enterprise sector, not for profit (NFP) Sector, and social metrics practitioners.

  4. What are social metrics? "Social metrics are measurement tools that can be used to define and articulate social value, social outcomes and the results generated by investment and activities in the social sector."

  5. Measuring what matters • Organizations use social metrics to measure the inputs, outputs, outcomes and impacts of their organization. • These components are linked to their mission through their theory of change.

  6. For many using social metrics is new

  7. Social Metrics Barriers • Time • Costs • Lack of resources

  8. What social metrics tools are used 17 different social metrics tools are used across the 28 organizations in the study. Including: • Asset Mapping • Charity Intelligence • Demonstrating Value (2 respondents) • Developmental Assets • Development Wheel • GIIRS • Google Analytics

  9. More social metrics tools used ….. • IRIS (Impact Reporting and Investing Standards) • Measuring Community Impact (2 respondents) • Results Based Management • Social Return on Investment (SROI) (3 respondents) • Sustainability Reporting • Sustainable Livelihoods (3 respondents) • Tracking volunteer hours • Vital Signs (2 respondents)

  10. Why use social metrics? Most organizations feel that social metrics allows them to ‘tell their story’ more effectively.

  11. Social metrics are used for such purposes as: • identifying where the organization is effective in addressing social needs in the community, • finding cost savings for the organization, • the interest of funders and investors, • savings for government.

  12. Who cares about social metrics? • Stakeholders identified in the survey: • Funders • Organization’s members • Employees • The Business sector group identified internal stakeholders as those most interested in the social metrics of the organization. Most often these are employees.

  13. Standardizing social metrics

  14. Role of Government in social metrics • Government is seen as a funder in the development of social metrics rather than having a legislative role. • Government is seen as partner with a role to play in creating opportunities for facilitating discussion, particularly across the country and for cooperative action between government bodies and the field as a whole.

  15. Conclusion • This survey provides a snap shot into how organizations in Canada understand and use social metrics. • Still a new and emerging field. • Often seen as ‘being required by funder rather than fully integrated into the organization’s planning cycle. • No consensus on whether social metrics should be standardized.

  16. Contact Dr. Tessa Hebb tessa_hebb@carleton.ca Director, Carleton Centre for Community Innovation www.carleton.ca/3ci

More Related