1 / 19

Updated 10/23/14 by Gary Bond

Evidence for the Effectiveness of Individual Placement and Support Model of Supported Employment. Updated 10/23/14 by Gary Bond. Expressed Interest in Employment Reported in 8 Surveys. Need. 2/3 clients with severe mental illness want to work, but only ~10% employed.

reed-frazier
Download Presentation

Updated 10/23/14 by Gary Bond

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evidence for the Effectiveness of Individual Placement and Support Model of Supported Employment Updated 10/23/14 by Gary Bond

  2. Expressed Interest in Employment Reported in 8 Surveys

  3. Need • 2/3 clients with severe mental illness want to work, but only ~10% employed. • Until the 1990s, no effective models for helping clients achieve stable competitive employment.

  4. Day Treatment Conversions to IPS: Common Study Design • Discontinued day treatment • Reassigned day treatment staff to new positions • Implemented new IPS program • Compared to 3 sites not converting Sources: Drake and Becker

  5. Day Treatment Conversion Studies: 6 Sites Converting to IPSvs. 4 Control Sites (Not Converting)

  6. Similar Results in All Day Treatment Conversions • Large increase in employment rates • No negative outcomes (e.g., relapses) • Clients, families, staff liked change • Most former day treatment clients spent more time in community, even those not working • Resulted in cost savings

  7. 22 Randomized Controlled Trials of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) • Best evidence available on effectiveness • RCTs are gold standard in medical research

  8. Competitive Employment Rates in 22 Randomized Controlled Trials of IPS

  9. Overall Findings for 22 RCTs • All 22 studies showed a significant advantage for IPS • Mean competitive employment rates for the 22 studies: • 56% for IPS • 23% for controls

  10. Four Measurement Domains of Employment Outcomes • Job acquisition (% employed) • Hours worked per week • Total hours worked/earnings • Job duration (months worked) (Bond, Campbell, & Drake, 2012)

  11. 18-Month Competitive Employment Outcomes in 4 Controlled Trials of IPS (Bond, Drake & Campbell, 2012)

  12. Mean Job Tenure in Two IPS Studies Job tenure for IPS was triple that for usual services in Hoffman study.

  13. Frequency and Percentage of Steady Workers in Long-Term Studies

  14. 5-Year Return on Investment for IPS and Traditional Voc Services (Hoffmann, 2014)

  15. IPS Is Effective in a Wide Variety of Target Populations • PTSD diagnosis • Frequently hospitalized • Mental illness + substance use • Older adults • Homeless • Criminal justice history • On disability benefits • African American • Hispanic

  16. Johnson & Johnson-Dartmouth IPS Learning Collaborative 17 states/regions in US (over 150 sites) 3 European countries (as of October 2014)

  17. IPS Fidelity and Outcomes in 88 Sites in Learning Collaborative (Bond et al., 2012)

More Related