280 likes | 527 Views
Introduction. WHO are we?Michael Assante - INLJeff Dagle
E N D
1. Advanced System Simulation to Support Operator TrainingIdaho Center of ExcellenceElectricity Infrastructure Operations Center Idaho National Laboratory
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Presented to the NERC RC Trainers
July 12, 2007
2. Introduction WHO are we?
Michael Assante - INL
Jeff Dagle – PNNL
Rick Byrne - NERC
WHY are we here?
Explain concept
WHAT do we want today?
Feedback on concept
3. What is the Idaho Center of Excellence (ICE)? Combined effort of Idaho National Labs and Pacific Northwest National Labs
Promotes advanced control systems testing and training for the electric industry
4. Rationale Meets 2003 Blackout recommendations for advanced training
An incremental upgrade on current INL/PNNL work
Captures and applies knowledge from aging workforce
Promotes excellence in training programs
Establishes relationships with vendors to improve training and product
5. Emulator Features More realistic and advanced
More accurate and detailed models and calculations than in classic simulators
Mimics the dynamic nature of system components
Allows for continuous activity
Multiple users on a scenario
Flexibility for different types of training
Users operate on familiar interface
6. Real-Time Electric System Modelling and Testing Ability is a Vital North American Need Real-time electric system modeling capability is essential for:
Simulating wide-area energy systems
Testing system contingencies
Effective equipment testing:
SCADA RTUs
Relays
PLCs
EMS, etc.
7. RTDS Racks used by Grid Operators World-Wide
8. Expand Real-Time Simulation Ability Real-time electric system modeling boosts SCADA testing capability … Would you test SCADA with off-line software models that emulate a few commands?
9. Add Realism to Operations/SCADA Training/Evaluation
10. Real-Time Simulation Equipment is Industry Proven and Scalable
11. Real-Time and Dynamic Simulations Give Real-World Inputs
12. Engineering Draft File Defines The System(Connections, Models, and Parameters)
13. Operator Run-Time Interface is One Form of a Power System Control Board
14. Example of How a Load Flow Contingency Analysis Can Mislead
15. Dynamic Simulation Voltage Magnitude Results Show That All Is Not Well …
16. System Models Must Include Load Dynamics Bus 6 to Bus 7, Line 1 trip by SCADA
Bus 9 to Bus 10, Lines 1 and 2 trip by relays
Type of control necessary to successfully damp oscillations depends on load dynamics
17. Load Dynamics Significantly Influence System Stability
18. How Large of a Model Is Necessary?
19. Divide the System Into RegionsUse System Equivalents Outside Test Area
20. Multi-regional Training
21. Additional Roles for the Emulator Training for other key personnel
Planning model validation
Real-time contingency analysis
Control and protection equipment testing and qualification
Cyber securityscenarios
22. Vision for the Future Recruit expert volunteers
Work with a few utilities to develop prototype demonstrations (proof of concept)
Progress to larger areas, more complex models
Bring training coordinators/senior operators to the center to develop scenarios
Train the trainers and system operators at the center
Develop wide area training capability (regional training centers, asset-owner training center)
Obtain current network models from participating utilities
Obtain current dynamic data to populate scenario models
23. Questions?
24. Real-Time Test Center Will Expand North American Testing Capabilities Model Actual Grid NA
Simulate/Run Abnormal System Conditions:
Extended Duration Faults
Power Swings
Voltage Collapse
Cascading Overloads
Equipment Outages
Test RAS Effectiveness
Test Wide-Area Schemes
25. Area of Interest Shown in Red
26. Area Details Remain Intact While Preserving Overall System Dynamics
27. We Need to Validate Electric System Response to SCADA Disturbances
28. We Need to Test SCADA Response to Electric System Disturbances Power swing blocking and tripping
Eliminate “best-guess” compromises
Bus protection operation
Breaker failure operation
Generator Dynamics:
Non-optimal PSS
AVR limits
IPP Start-up/Shut-down sequencing
Load rejection
Load-shed schemes
29. Reliability Coordinator Training