1 / 22

Overlay Multicast for MANETs Using Dynamic Virtual Mesh

Overlay Multicast for MANETs Using Dynamic Virtual Mesh. Chao Gui, Prasant Mohapatra Computer Science department of University of California Wireless Networks 2007. Outline. Introduction Motivations PAST-DM protocol Performance Evaluation Conclusions. Introduction.

reese-roberson
Download Presentation

Overlay Multicast for MANETs Using Dynamic Virtual Mesh

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Overlay Multicast for MANETs Using Dynamic Virtual Mesh Chao Gui, Prasant Mohapatra Computer Science department of University of California Wireless Networks 2007

  2. Outline • Introduction • Motivations • PAST-DM protocol • Performance Evaluation • Conclusions

  3. Introduction • Multicasting in MANET face many challenges • Continuous changes in network topology • Limited channel bandwidth • Multicast routing protocol can classify into • Tree-based • Mesh-based • Combined method

  4. Introduction- Overlay multicast in MANETs

  5. Motivations • Traditional MANET multicast protocols • Maintain state information at all network node • Member node and Non-Member Node • Widespread maintenance of state information lowers the protocol robustness against the node mobility • Fast moving • The Group-Join and Group-Leave is a burden to both member nodes and participating non-member nodes

  6. Motivations- Goal • Minimized the control overhead • Maintain a partial view of virtual mesh • Balanced between low control overhead and high multicast tree quality

  7. PAST-DM • Two parts • Dynamic Mesh (DM) • Group_REQ flooding • Dynamic mesh maintenance by link state exchange • Detection of remote island • Progressively Adapted Sub-Tree forwarding • Progressively adapted source-based tree • Join and Leave

  8. DM Virtual topology Physical topology D D 4 3 A A 1 2 source source B B C 5 C

  9. DM D A A D C B B C B-5 and 5-C redundant 3 3 3 A A 4 1 2 4 1 B 2 B D D 5 C 5 C

  10. DM- Group_REQ flooding • Group_REQ packet • Only rebroadcast by non-member nodes, not by member node • The packet will be consumed by surrounding members …… Group_REQ Island Mainland

  11. DM- Group_REQ flooding Rn Rl

  12. DM- Group_REQ flooding VN set definition Set PLST_TTL(nodei)

  13. DM- Dynamic mesh maintenance by link state exchange • Each node records its virtual neighbors (VN) as its virtual link state • The maximum degree of the virtual topology is controlled • Link State Table (LST) • At each member node, the topology map represented as a LST • Maintain the link state information of all group nodes obtained from VNs • Periodically exchanges LST with its neighbors • A TTL bounded local flooding

  14. DM- Dynamic mesh maintenance by link state exchange B- A,C,D A- B,E C- B,D D- B,C,E A- B,E B- A,C,D E- A,D B C C- B,C,E B- A,C,D D- B,C,E A E D E- A,D A- B,E D- B,C,E D- B,C,E B- A,C,D C- B,D E- A,D

  15. DM- Dynamic mesh maintenance by link state exchange B- A,C,D A- B,E C- B,D D- B,C,E E- A,D A- B,E B- A,C,D E- A,D C- B,D D- B,C,E B C C- B,C,E B- A,C,D D- B,C,E E- A,D A- B,E A E D E- A,D A- B,E D- B,C,E B- A,C,D C- B,D D- B,C,E B- A,C,D C- B,D E- A,D A- B,E

  16. DM- Dynamic mesh maintenance by link state exchange • Link State Table • Far_LST • Maintain long unicast tunnel in a virtual mesh • Near_LST • Each member node locally flood within a limited region (TTL)

  17. DM- Detect of remote island • Use “Leaky Bucket” • The initial level of the LB at each node is determined by its link state • Each LB leaks at constant rate • When node I stays in the mainland, it constantly receives LST packet, which maintain its LB level

  18. DM- Detect of remote island

  19. PAST- Progressively adapted source-based algorithm • Link state entries • Less accurate with increasing hop distance • ds(n) denote the hop distance from source node s to node n • Virtual link (n1 , n2) • ds(n1 , n2)=min [ ds(n1) , ds(n2) ] • c(n1 , n2) be the cost of virtual link (n1, n2) • ac(n1, n2)=ds(n1, n2)‧c(n1, n2)

  20. Performance Evaluation • Mobile Node : 100 • Range : 2000m × 750m • Communication Range : 250m • Moving Model • Each node select a destination location randomly • Moving straight toward to destination with constant speed • Moving speed is uniform distributed over [10,20] • Group Size : 5,10,20,30,40 • Simulator : GloMoSim & Developed simulator

  21. Conclusions • PAST-DM • Dynamic virtual mesh that adapts itself to the mobility of network nodes • Novel tree construction algorithm • Fully utilizes the latest loco topology information

  22. Thank You

More Related