1 / 5

Committee on University Effectiveness

Committee on University Effectiveness. Working Group on Institutional Assessment April 9, 2012. Proposed “Next Steps” for the Team. Develop formal guidelines for Institutional Assessment Done – Review and discuss today

regina-best
Download Presentation

Committee on University Effectiveness

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Committee on University Effectiveness Working Group on Institutional Assessment April 9, 2012

  2. Proposed “Next Steps” for the Team • Develop formal guidelines for Institutional Assessment • Done – Review and discuss today • Develop required templates and instructions, and/or recommend software solutions (e.g. TracDat) • Done – Review and discuss template & TracDat today • Meet with units to explain procedures, and provide continuing advice on an “as needed” basis • In progress (SDCL), with 6 remaining Divisions upcoming • Monitor unit activities, and prepare an annual report on Institutional Assessment • In progress (SDCL) with assessment results expected 2012-13

  3. Proposed Guidelines for Divisions • Steps emerging from SDCL experience: • Map Divisional priorities and responsibilities to the new University Strategic Plan Goals, Objectives, and Sub-Objectives • Determine which Planning Unit(s) will be linked to each Sub-Objective that the Division has decided is central to its mission • Request that Planning Units submit assessment plans to CUE for each Sub-Objective they have been assigned [w/training] • CUE reviews submitted assessment plans, requests revisions (if needed), and approves entry of plans into TracDat • Planning Units enter assessment plans, results, supporting data, and “next steps” (as needed) into TracDat [w/training]

  4. Typical Steps at the Unit Level • Units articulate their goals and objectives • Units define how they plan to measure progress, and identify data collection methods (ideally, more than one) • Units collect and analyze data, identifying areas of success (for possible expansion), and areas needing improvement (with action plans) • Units “close the loop” by reporting on changes they made based on the data, and the impact of those changes

  5. Proposed Template for Divisions • Identify Planning Units and responsible persons • Review all Strategic Plan goals, objectives, and sub-objectives for relevance to Division’s mission • Assign Planning Units to address sub-objectives the Division deems to be relevant • Identify Division-specific goals and objectives that may not be addressed in the University’s Strategic Plan • Assign Planning Units to address these Division-specific objectives

More Related