280 likes | 424 Views
Cyclical vs. Stochastic Visual Search Models. &. How a Target’s Effect on the Eye Varies with Distance. Andrew Elias 11 Aug 2011 NRL Code 7440 branch meeting. Eye Tracking. Fixations: eye stops (avg. 400 ms) Saccades: jerky eye movements, no data intake. The Experiment. 30 FA18 pilots
E N D
Cyclical vs. Stochastic Visual Search Models & How a Target’s Effect on the Eye Varies with Distance Andrew Elias 11 Aug 2011 NRL Code 7440 branch meeting
Eye Tracking Fixations: eye stops (avg. 400 ms) Saccades: jerky eye movements, no data intake
The Experiment 30 FA18 pilots 72 images 24 distinct maps With/without targets sorted: 3 clutter levels High/low local clutter near target Target:
Cyclical vs. Stochastic Visual Search Models Cyclical: avoid re-examining things Stochastic: don’t worry about re-examining things
Disclaimer:Examination Radius (parameter) chosen to make Stochastic model fit the best
Conclusion Stochastic model is correct. (at least for the majority of our trials)
Further Research • Comparing clutter levels or pilot experience levels: do models/parameters change? • Using model parameters as a new measure of global clutter (!!!) or pilot skill • Analyze subjects/maps individually to see if some use/allow Cyclical model.
How a Target’s Effect on the Eye Varies With Distance Purpose: fixation “size” small? large? fuzzy?
At what distance does saccade length change? Map Edge 120 px 55 px
Successful Saccade (n.) a saccade which ultimately brings the subject closer to the target
P(Success | Not Seeing) P(Success) Distance to Target (px) Distance to Target (px) P(Seeing) Seeing orremembering Distance to Target (px)
Successful Run-of-Saccades L:the number of saccades into the future that we observe
Conclusions • 55 px is the threshold for glance-away saccades • Attention-grabbing radius may be fuzzy (at least for a large group), but probably spans a subset of the the 55-450 px zone. Maybe ~120 px • These values may be target-dependent and map-dependent. • ‘450 px’ value is especially map-dependent. • Reaction “time” is less than two saccades.
a visualization: 44 (±3) px/deg
Further Research • Remove all after-target fixations and see if 2nd bump disappears, and if 1st bump gets clearer • Blend distributions to model the control-group function
Acknowledgments • Maura Lohrenz, 7441 section head • Melissa Beck (LSU) • Todd, Stephanie, Mike, Jeremy • fellow students! • experiment participants