1 / 32

Former ASA(ALT)/AAE Perspective

The Honorable Claude M. Bolton, Jr., DSc DAU Executive in Residence. Former ASA(ALT)/AAE Perspective. The Human Brain. 16. An Amazing Set of Facts. Computational Power = 10 cycles per second Weight = 4 lbs. Volume = 0.06 cubic feet. Trivia Question.

rehan
Download Presentation

Former ASA(ALT)/AAE Perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Honorable Claude M. Bolton, Jr., DSc DAU Executive in Residence Former ASA(ALT)/AAE Perspective

  2. The Human Brain 16 An Amazing Set of Facts Computational Power = 10 cycles per second Weight = 4 lbs. Volume = 0.06 cubic feet

  3. Trivia Question How Many Watts Of Power Does The Human Brain Consume?

  4. Bluegene Is The Most Powerful Supercomputer. Trivia Answer 15 Watts 15 • Computational Power = 10 cycles per second • Weight = 100,000 lbs. • Volume = 5000 cubic feet Power Required = 2,000,000 Watts (Data provided by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  5. Challenges • Focus Areas • Programs • People • Production • Improvement • Provide the Soldier • Right Product • Right Time • Right Place • Right Price

  6. PM PEO Concerns & Interests Three R’s Big A, little a PORs vs Non-PORs Politics DoD Core Processes—War vs Non-War Budget…lack of… LCM/LCMC Bandwidth…lack of…

  7. Ethics DoD Prototyping Policy Oversight Increasing/Expertise Decreasing Army Contracting Agency Section 852:   but…$... Acquisition History/Lessons Learned Termination Process…lack of… Acquisition Workforce & Leadership Committment PM PEO Concerns & Interests

  8. FCS Increment 1 Manned Systems Unmanned Air Vehicles Class IV Command and Control Vehicle Class III Class II Class I Infantry Carrier Vehicle Unattended Munitions Unattended Ground Sensors NLOS LS Intelligent Munitions System Mounted Combat System Recon and Surveillance Vehicle Unmanned Ground Vehicles ARV RSTA ARV Aslt Non-Line of Sight Cannon Non-Line of Sight Mortar Small (Manpackable) UGV Armed Robotic Vehicle MULE: (Transport) Medical Treatment and Evacuation FCS Recovery and Maintenance Vehicle ARV-A (L) MULE: (Countermine)

  9. $618 WW II 600 550 $517 $480B ? 500 $469 450 $434 $440 400 Reagan 350 Buildup Vietnam War on 300 Terrorism Korea 250 200 150 Average % change in budget: 100 Truman Truman Eisenhower Eisenhower Kennedy Kennedy Johnson Johnson Nixon Nixon Ford Ford Carter Carter Reagan Reagan Bush Bush Clinton Clinton G.W. G.W. Bush 50 +15.4 +15.4 - - 5.8 5.8 +5.1 +5.1 +4.5 +4.5 - - 5.6 5.6 0 0 +1.2 +1.2 +3.8 +3.8 - - 3.3 3.3 - - 1.8 1.8 +8.6 +8.6 0 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 DoD Budget Authority by Presidency $ (Billions), Constant FY04 dollars

  10. 40% 35% 30% 25% Percentage 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1995 2000 2005 1905 1990 1910 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935 1980 1985 Fiscal Year Defense Outlays as a Percentage of GNP/GDP FY 1905 - 2005 Source: FY 2005 President’s Budget

  11. Cost of Wars as a Percent of GDP PERCENTAGE (%) Source:  Robert Whaples, Wake Forest University

  12. Percentage (%) of GDP Consumer Spending vs. DoD Funding 15.15% * Health Care Figures Provided By The National Coalition On Health Care * Automobile Figures Provided By Department Of Commerce, Bureau Of Economic Analysis *Holiday Figures Provided By The National Retail Federation * Department of Defense Figures Provided By SAAL-RI

  13. Percentage (%) of GDP What If… Without DoD & Army Funding, The Rest Would Be Impossible X What If… DoD & US Army = 0%

  14. Billions ($) FY06 Consumer Spending vs. DoD Funding *Projected 2006 figures *Holiday Figures Provided by the National Retail Federation *Pet spending statistics are gathered by APPMA from various market research sources

  15. Billions ($) FY06 Consumer Spending vs. Army Funding *Projected 2006 figures *Holiday Figures Provided by the National Retail Federation *Pet spending statistics are gathered by APPMA from various market research sources

  16. Percentage (%) Army = 0% What If… Without Army Funding, The Rest Would Be Impossible X X X

  17. 40% 35% 30% 25% Percentage 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1995 2000 2005 1905 1990 1910 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935 1980 1985 Fiscal Year Defense Outlays as a Percentage of GNP/GDP FY 1905 - 2005 Source: FY 2005 President’s Budget

  18. Conflicts with U.S. Involvement Since 1905 GWOT COLD WAR Marines Intervene In Honduras -- 1909 US Troops Sent To Nicaragua -- 1926 Bosnia Peacekeeping Operations - 1995 September 11, 2001 – Terrorist Attacks F-14s Shoot Down Libyan MIGs - 1981 US Troops Sent To Cuba -- 1906 Failed Iranian Hostage Rescue - 1980 Intervention In Panama – 1989-1990 U2 Shot Down Over USSR - 1960 Intervention In Somalia - 1993 Intervention In Kosovo - 1998 Operation Enduring Freedom – 2001 - Present Marines Land In Beirut - 1958 Invasion Of Grenada - 1983 Intervention In Haiti - 1994 Libyan Airstrike - 1986 Operation Iraqi Freedom – 2003 - Present Berlin Airlift - 1948 World War II – 1941-1945 Vietnam War – 1964-1975 Korean War – 1950-1953 World War I – 1917-1919 Gulf War – 1990-1991

  19. Question How Do We Maintain A World Class Military On 2% GDP With A Hundred Years Of History Against Us?

  20. Solution We Must Change The Way The DoD Does Business! a.k.a Acquisition & Logistics Excellence…Transformation

  21. “BIG A – little a” One Process – One Team CAPABILITY NEED ACQUIRE DEVELOP CONTRACT TEST PRODUCE FIELD TEST / DOT&E OPERATE/SUSTAIN UPGRADE/MODERNIZE FMS RESOURCES RETIRE DEMIL acquisition ACQUISITION ? D O T L M P F Doctrine, Organizations, Training, Leader Development, Materiel, Personnel, Facilities

  22. A PM PM LOG PM PM PM PM ENGR PM PM LOG ACQ ENGR ENGR FMS ACQ ACQ ENGR FMS MI SPARES Life Cycle Management Commands (LCMC) Soldier Focused AMC Commodity Commands LCMCs Enable a Collaborative Relationship between AMC MSCs and PEOs. • Continuous Communications • 360 Degree Feedback • Integrated/ Unified Effort Lessons Learned Production and Fielding Resources/Direction Production Decision C Improvements Suggestions Feedback AFSC: AMC’s Face to the Field PEOs/ PMs RDECOM Current Requirements B Future Capabilities Technology/System Improvements Program Initiation Initiate Studies More Reliable Systems, Reduced Cost Futures Center TRADOC Systems Managers/ Directors for Combat Development Acquisition Life Cycle and Functional Change:Cruise Missile Defense Systems Example DEVELOPMENT PROCUREMENT FIELDING SUSTAINING

  23. Program Termination Decision Tool Program Manager - Attitude - Training - Motivation Program Health - Cost - Schedule - Performance Program Politics - User (rqmts) - Service - OSD - Congress - Contractor - International Countries - Media

  24. What Will It Take? $115 - $130 Billion

  25. ???? claude.bolton@dau.mil

  26. ATIRCM/Common Missile Warning System (ACAT IC--D) Joint Program (Army Lead) Key Program Parameters(rebaselined Sep 99) Schedule Variance SV = 0% SV$ = - 1.367M * KPPs normalized to 100% Key Issues/Risks Cost Variance Awaiting official program termination position by USD(AT&L) - Memorandum from OSD currently being drafted to SAF/AQ acknowledging AF concerns but supporting Army position--will require AF funding support for CMWS EMD from FY01-03 in the amounts requested by Army - FY 02 AF POM position reflects zero-funding for CMWS - Appropriations Conference Committee has zeroed AF CMWS funding - Army revising schedule to reflect Army-only program - APB and Program Office Estimate to be revised upon official OSD decision - Develop MOU with Army to ensure smooth transition to Army-only program CMWS System Performance Test completed Jul 00--no showstoppers CV = 0% CV$ = .161M

  27. Current Future Force FCS S&T, Defense, Commercial, Foreign Current Future

  28. Rapid Fielding Initiative Equipment Items Fielded to All Soldiers Advanced Combat Helmet, Cover & Mount Wick-Away Sports Bra Black Fleece Bib Close Combat Optics Nomex Glove System Hydration System M4/M16 & M9 Magazine Moisture Wicking T-Shirt MOLLE Accessories (BCT Item) Silk Weight Underwear Knee & Elbow Pads (BCT Item) Combat Belt COTS Socks Improved Hot Weather Desert Boot & Infantry Combat Boot Type II Cold Weather Cap Ballistic Eyewear Protection And Goggles

  29. Rapid Equipping Force (REF) REF IS an Innovative Provider of State-of-the-Art Equipment Not Available to Commanders Through the Regular Fielding Process. Translators Wellcam PACKBOT

  30. AND Change the way you do Business!

  31. “BIG A – little a” One Process – One Team CAPABILITY NEED ACQUIRE DEVELOP CONTRACT TEST PRODUCE FIELD TEST / DOT&E OPERATE/SUSTAIN UPGRADE/MODERNIZE FMS RESOURCES RETIRE DEMIL a cquisition A CQUISITION ? D O T L M P F Doctrine, Organizations, Training, Leader Development, Materiel, Personnel, Facilities

More Related