90 likes | 172 Views
Round up of other planning news Graham Withers, Development Management. “If anyone comes to me with an idea for new planning legislation I am going to shoot them". National changes to Design and Access Statements. From 25 June 2013 Design and Access Statements now only required for:
E N D
Round up of other planning newsGraham Withers, Development Management “If anyone comes to me with an idea for new planning legislation I am going to shoot them".
National changes to Design and Access Statements • From 25 June 2013 • Design and Access Statements now only required for: • Major developments • Listed Buildings • Dwellings or 100 sq m + in a Conservation Area • No longer required for smaller extensions and alterations in Cons Area • Simplified content – “explain the design principles and concepts that have been applied to the development” • Less access explanations required
Keeping validation requirements (LPAR) reasonable • Have to refresh every 2 years (Sheffield last published 7 Jan 2013) • Must be “reasonable having regard, in particular, to the nature and scale of the proposed development” and “about a matter which it is reasonable to think will be a material consideration in the determination of the application”.
New process for disputed validations relating to LPAR • From 25 June 2013 • ‘Non-validated applications’ • Applicant notice disputing invalid • LPA either validates or serves a non-validation notice explaining why disagree • LPA processes as non-validated, but must determine by 8/13 week statutory period • Applicant can then appeal if refused for insufficient information or (if appropriate) on grounds of non-determination
The Planning Guarantee Few applications should take longer than 26 weeks to determine Refunds 26 weeks after date valid • For applications for planning permission or approval of reserved matters • Unless written agreement to extend period For case officers: • May have to do more chasing of over-stretched consultees • Must make timely requests for information or amendments For applicants and agents: • Be prepared for case officers unwilling to wait for missing information or amendments, especially for small-scale schemes • Multiple condition applications need to have all the required information
Planning Performance Agreements • Planning performance and the planning guaranteeconsultation response issued by DCLG. Indicates that poor performering LPAs to be identified from 2 year period ending June 2013, and that PPA and post-submission extension of time agreements to be accepted, provided in writing, set a timetable and it is achieved. • Criteria for identifying poor performing LPAs still: • 30 per cent or fewer major applications on time, or • more than 20 per cent of major decisions are overturned at appeal • Sheffield will be unaffected • Given that written agreements also avoid refunds for over 26 week applications, Sheffield is willing to use PPAs at both pre-application and post-submission stages for Major Applications.
Other changes • Judicial Review time limit to be reduced from 3 months to 6 weeks (from 1 July 2013) • New right of appeal to the secretary of state to vary an affordable housing requirement contained in a planning obligation (Sheffield already reasonable) • Gov. reviewing around 6,000 pages of supporting planning guidance behind NPPF • Removed requirement for advisory note explaining why planning consent granted (from 25 June) • PINS to extend expedited householder appeal service to small scale commercial developments
Update on C-Plan option for Sustainability Statements • Online tool that helps applicants submit energy and sustainability statements • 5 Yorkshire and Humber LPAs now using and others to follow • Improved after user testing • Can now put in own energy data or pay a fee for C-Plan to calculate • Expect to launch soon and evaluate after a year