270 likes | 834 Views
Chapter Twelve: Ideological Terrorism. The Status of Ideological Terrorism. The Status of Ideological Terrorism. Ideological terrorism vs. single-issue terrorism Ideological terrorism refers to small groups who terrorize for the purpose of imposing their political ideals on others
E N D
The Status of Ideological Terrorism • Ideological terrorism vs. single-issue terrorism • Ideological terrorism refers to small groups who terrorize for the purpose of imposing their political ideals on others • Single-issue terrorists embrace a single cause such as antiglobalism, animal rights, ecology, abortion, or anarchism • Ideological terrorism developed from theories of revolution and was closely tied to models of guerilla warfare
The Status of Ideological Terrorism • The effect of religious violence on ideological terrorism • Most of the groups lost sponsors when the Soviet Union collapsed • Right-wing groups modified their politics with tailored-made religions, especially in the United States • As death and violence increased with the advent of religious terrorism, many ideologues renounced violence • The nations that continued to support terrorism did so under the new rules of the game • They either endorsed religion or let the issue driving violence become a surrogate religion expressed in absolutist terms
The Status of Ideological Terrorism • Surrogate religion • The group replaces religious behavior with an ideology that has the power of religion • When violence is internalized, that is, focused on its own members, the group can become a religious cult • If the group targets victims in the outside world, it frequently behaves like a religious terrorist organization
The Status of Ideological Terrorism • State-sponsored terrorism • State-sponsored terrorism is terrorism supported by a nation-state • Ideology is related to state-sponsored terrorism, but ideological terrorism has been transformed since the fall of the Soviet Union • The ideology that supports terrorism tends to come from the passion surrounding an issue, not state sponsorship • State sponsorship may occur on the fringes, but a single ideology drives the violence
Ideology and Marighella’s Urban Model • Urban guerilla and urban terrorism • Ideologically driven terrorism emerged from anticolonialism • The model for such terrorism was based on the idea of the urban guerilla and urban terrorism. These ideas were initially championed by Frantz Fannon
Ideology and Marighella’s Urban Model • Frantz Fannon • In the Wretched of the Earth, Fannon writes that Western powers have dehumanized non-Western people by destroying their cultures and replacing them with Western values • The masses end up suffering a perpetual identity crisis: To succeed, they are forced to deny their heritage. Fanon argues that the natives can follow only one course of action: revolution • He claimed decolonization was destined to be a violent process because it involved replacing one group of powerful people with another group; achieving freedom was inherently violent
Ideology and Marighella’s Urban Model • Frantz Fannon • Fanon advocated rural guerrilla warfare as the primary method of revolution • Terrorism had a specific purpose: to terrorize Westerners and their followers into submission • Urban terror was to create mayhem, and all terrorism was to be excessively brutal to communicate fear. Fanon’s guerrilla model thus uses terrorism as a strategy and deviates from typical guerrillas who try to build a military force
Ideology and Marighella’s Urban Model • Carlos Marighella and the Marighella model • For the Liberation of Brazil and The Minimanual of the Urban Guerrilla, Marighella designed and presented practical guides for terrorism • Marighella wanted to move violence from the countryside to the city and designed a method for organizing a campaign of terror that has been used by groups ranging across the political spectrum • The Japanese Red Army • The Freemen of Montana • The basis of revolution was violence • All violence could be urban-based and controlled by a small group of urban guerillas
Ideology and Marighella’s Urban Model • Robert Moss’ synopsis of Marighella’s writings • Urban terrorism was to begin with two distinct phases, one designed to bring about actual violence, and the other designed to give that violence meaning • The terror campaign was to be accompanied by a psychological offensive, that is, a mass movement of revolutionary sympathizers, to provide peripheral support for terrorists • A campaign of revolutionary terrorism in an urban setting could be used to destabilize government power; Governmental repression was the goal of terrorism at this stage • Marighella believed that the public supported government policies because they did not recognize the repressive nature of the state. A terrorist campaign would force the government to reveal that repressive nature, thereby alienating the public
Ideology and Marighella’s Urban Model • The firing team • The purpose of the urban guerrilla is to shoot. The job of the firing team, Marighella’s basic unit, is to kill • The firing team is composed of four to five terrorists. Several firing teams are needed to construct a terrorist organization, but the team can exist on its own • The firing team is the basic weapon of the urban guerilla
Ideology and Marighella’s Urban Model • The Marighella model and terrorism • This model of urban terrorism and revolution would be an excellent theory for revolutionaries if it were functional • It does not work; it does not topple governments • Most ideological terrorist groups have followed the path of Marighella. They cannot become strong enough to create a new order, but they can terrorize a community or country
The Demise of Left-Wing Ideology in Europe • Raymond Corrado and Rebecca Evans • The ideological terrorists of the 1960s, on both the left and the right, were expressing their frustration with the social structures imposed by a modern industrial society • The fundamental difference between ideological and nationalist terrorists can be found in their goals. Ideological terrorists in Europe reject the economic and social structure of industrial capitalism; they want a new order • Nationalists, on the other hand, frequently embrace capitalism and fight for ethnic self-determination. They desire economic opportunity within the context of a strong national identity. Nationalism stays, ideology does not
The Demise of Left-Wing Ideology in Europe • Raymond Corrado and Rebecca Evans • Corrado and Evans conclude, the popularity of nationalistic and left-wing terrorism was changing • As pluralistic governments worked to relieve frustration, the attractiveness of terrorism waned, and terrorists lost their support base. Corrado and Evans assumed that terrorist violence would fade away, only reappearing in a few sporadic incidents
The Demise of Left-Wing Ideology in Europe • Three key events that changed the political destiny and the world • The Berlin Wall came down, leading to the reunification of Germany • To the south, new nations emerging from the former Yugoslavia took up arms and resumed a centuries-old struggle • The Soviet Union dissolved, along with the authoritarian rule of the Communist Party in the republics of the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe
The Demise of Left-Wing Ideology in Europe • Pluchinsky and supraindigenous terrorism • By the term supraindigenous terrorism, Pluchinsky meant that local terrorist activities would extend beyond local boundaries; Each time a government brings one variety of terrorism into check, a new strain appears • As the structure of Europe and the world changed from 1989 to 1992, European terrorism also changed • Ideological terrorism swung from the left to right, changing its structure as it moved
The Demise of Left-Wing Ideology in Europe • Stephen Segaller • Segaller believes that the European leftists were seeking unity out of weakness, not strength • Modern European terrorism emerged in the 1960s as an extreme reflection of left-wing activism • By 1970, most left-wing groups and the resurgent nationalist groups modeled themselves after the Marighella model • In 1985, the left-wing movement faced its weakness and tried to form a confederation to gain momentum • The left-wing coalition was an effort to pool dwindling resources and support
The Demise of Left-Wing Ideology in Europe • The Red Brigades • The organization of the Red Brigades was unique in European terrorism • They came closer to matching the Marighella model than did any other group in Europe • The Red Brigades had a variety of urban centers. Each unit became a fairly autonomous organization within its own area
The Demise of Left-Wing Ideology in Europe • The current state of left-wing terrorism in Europe • The ideological basis for left-wing terrorism in Europe is out of vogue • Only three groups remained active in the 1990s • Dev Sol in Turkey • GRAPO in Spain • 17N in Greece • The ideological basis for left-wing terrorism has been eliminated • Single-issue terrorism is in its infancy in Europe • The bigger threat comes from international Jihadists, cultlike groups, and new strains replacing the old
Iraq Insurgency: Guerillas or Terrorists, Ethnic or Ideological?
Iraq Insurgency: Guerillas or Terrorists, Ethnic or Ideological? • Objectives for the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq • The United States sought to enforce a mandate from the United Nations to end the production and possession of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq • The United States wanted to end the reign of Saddam Hussein and implement a democratically elected government • The stated purpose was to end collusion between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda • After the major offensive, the campaign of violence against the United States and its allies was horrendous • Democratic elections took place in Iraq in January of 2005, but the Iraq insurgency continued
Iraq Insurgency: Guerillas or Terrorists, Ethnic or Ideological? • Three main insurgent groups • Displaced Ba’athists who were part of Sadddam Hussein’s regime • Many Ba’athists believe they can reclaim power. The see themselves engaged in a guerilla campaign • Iraqis who want the United States to leave their country • Sunni militants • Militant Shi’ites • Iraqi Criminals
Iraq Insurgency: Guerillas or Terrorists, Ethnic or Ideological? • Jihadists who have come to Iraq to fight the United States • Some flock from surrounding areas to fight as guerillas • Some are terrorists within an al Qaeda\-style umbrella • They are behind many of the murderous kidnappings and suicide bombings • The three insurgent groups do not share a common vision for the future of Iraq and they are frequently at odds with each other
Iraq Insurgency: Guerillas or Terrorists, Ethnic or Ideological? • The culture factor • An old Arab folk saying illustrates the overriding importance of family ties in Arab culture and the response to “the stranger”: “I and my brothers against my cousins; I and my cousins against the stranger” • When such cultural aspects combine with the various ideologies motivating insurgent groups, it is possible to see that a major portion of the insurrection does not involve terrorism • Many of the actions against Americans and their allies do not involve terrorism • If the United States is to end major combat operations in Iraq, it will need to implement a strategy that addresses the major issues that insurgents and terrorist groups use to justify violence