200 likes | 373 Views
EU Programme for Authorised Economic Operators . Community acquis. Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 302 19.10.1992 p. 1), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 648/2005
E N D
Community acquis • Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 302 19.10.1992 p. 1), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 648/2005 • Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 253 11.10.1993 p. 1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1875/2006 • Regulation (EC) No 450/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 laying down the Community Customs Code (Modernised Customs Code) (OJ L 145, 4.6.2008, p. 1–64 )
EU programme for Authorised Economic Operators (AEO) • In force since 01.01.2008 • AEO authorisations recognised in all 27 MS • And not limited in time Types of AEO • AEO/ Customs Simplifications • AEO/ Security and Safety • AEO/ Full (Customs Simplifications + Security and Safety)
EU programme for AEO Economic operator: “a person who, in the course of his business, is involved in activities covered by customs legislation”, e.g.: • Manufacturers • Exporters • Freight forwarders • Warehouse keepers • Customs agents • Carriers • Importers • Port operators
EU programme for AEO Legislation focuses on 4 major areas: • Criteria that have to be complied with • Authorisation procedure • Benefits in the area of facilitation and simplifications for customs procedures • Management of the already issued AEO authorisation
AEO conditions and criteria • General conditions: the status can be granted only to: • persons, • established in the Community customs territory; • Criteria: • an appropriate record of compliance with customs requirements; • a satisfactory system of managing commercial and, where appropriate, transport records, which allows appropriate customs controls; • proven financial solvency; and • where applicable, appropriate security and safety standards, in accordance with WCO SAFE.
AEO conditions and criteria • Criteria are the same for all economic operators • Implementation measures will however differ depending on the sector and the size of the AEO • A small company will implement same measures but in a different way than a company with 300 employees (e.g possibly no need for surveillance camera if staff can see what happens and who enters and leaves the building)
Management of the AEO authorisations • Monitoring • Reassessment • Suspension • Revocation
Monitoring and Re-assessment • Customs authority shall monitor the compliance with the conditions and criteria to be met by the authorized economic operator • “Monitoring” can be defined as a procedure “to carefully watch and check a situation in order to see how it changes over a period of time” it should be intended on continuous basis. • The operator’s activities should be continuously and constantly observed in order to collect useful information to correct and/or improve the quality of its processes in order to promptly intervene in case of customs high risk. • Monitoring can result in a Re-assessment.
Monitoring and Re-assessment • Re-assessment is a re-evaluation of a part or all criteria that an economic operator has been deemed to have met. • The need for re-assess criteria could be based on: • Major changes in the relevant legislation; • risk analysis and the findings found out during auditing activities (look final report); • information collected during monitoring process;
AEO Benefits • AEO/Customs Simplifications: • easier admittance to customs simplification (e.g., simplified customs declarations, clearance of goods at importer premises); • fewer physical and document-based controls; • priority treatment if selected for control; • possibility to request a specific place for such control. • AEO/Security and Safety (and AEO Full): • possibility of prior notification; • fewer physical and document-based controls; • priority treatment if selected for control; • possibility to request a specific place for such control.
AEO Benefits Indirect benefits: Examples: • Recognised as a safe and secure business partner (MR) • Improved relations with Customs • Improved relations and acknowledgement by other government authorities • Improved planning • Improved inventory management • Improved customer service
EU AEO Guidelines • Tool to facilitate the correct application of the new legal provisions; • Tool to guarantee a harmonized and systematic approach in MS; • Focused on the criteria operators must meet in order to obtain AEO status; • For each criterion a template has been prepared containing the relevant risks (indicators) related to that criterion, a short description of the risk (risk description) and the relevant questions to keep in mind in order to assess it (points for attention); • Update of the AEO Guidelines
Other tools/documents used • Self assessment questionnaire (SAQ): • currently not obligatory under the legislation (however highly recommended and used); • new, updated version in use since 1 January 2011; • facilitate both customs authorities and economic operators; • AEO Compact Model • EU Economic Operators System (EOS) • AEO E-learning tool
EU and Mutual Recognition of trade programmes • EU current agreements • Japan • Norway • Switzerland • Andorra • US • EU ongoing negotiations • China
AEO statistics 2008 the first year of implementation: • Applications 1850; • Certificates 565; Total (as of 21-06-2012): (EU level) • Applications 13 693; • Certificates 11 223, including 5 727 (S+F) and AEOC – 5 496;