1 / 13

Teacher Development, Evaluation, and Peer Support

Teacher Development, Evaluation, and Peer Support. Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014. Mission statement. To develop, improve, and support educators and effective teaching practices and improve student learning and success.

reilly
Download Presentation

Teacher Development, Evaluation, and Peer Support

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Teacher Development, Evaluation, and Peer Support Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014

  2. Mission statement • To develop, improve, and support educators and effective teaching practices and improve student learning and success.

  3. Teacher Knowledge, Skills, and Professional Responsibilities Professional Practice 65% Charlotte Danielson Planning and Preparation – Classroom Environment – Professional Responsibilities District Priorities and Supports Curriculum Teaching and Learning Framework Improvement Planning and Priorities Evidence of Student Learning District Goals 5% Site Goals 10% Individual Goals 20% Student Engagement Charlotte Danielson Framework for Teaching Domain 3C Professional Development and Learning

  4. Professional Growth and Development Plan (PGDP) • All teachers set 3 year Professional Area of Focus • Need to set an annual goal each year aligned to area of focus • Continue to set 2 Individual Goals as part of Q-Comp process (or project) • These goals CAN align! • Review annually with administrator

  5. What will my evaluation look like? • 3 Key Components • Professional Practice (observation process) • Student Engagement (part of observation) • Evidence of Student Learning

  6. Teacher Professional Practice • Charlotte Danielson Framework for Teaching (FfT) • Four Domains (Similar to Current Model) • Planning and Preparation • Classroom Environment • Instruction • Professional Responsibilities • Teachscape

  7. Student Engagement • Domain 3c in Danielson Framework for Teaching • Engages students in learning • Student Engagement Walkthrough

  8. Evidence of Student Learning • Must total at minimum 35% of evaluation • 3 parts • District Goals (5% of evaluation) • Site Improvement Plan (10% of evaluation) • Individually Defined (20% of evaluation) • Set by teacher and administrator; could be based on individual goal

  9. Evidence of Student Learning • **explain rubric here**

  10. Portfolio Option • Additional Evidence for Consideration • E-Folio Possibility

  11. Why create our own model? • The State Model is Cumbersome • The implementation handbook alone is 103 pages long • Our proposal was created to align to our system • We have worked with a team of teachers, administrators, and EA reps to develop our plan

  12. for more information • Staff Link – Teacher Evaluation Page • Includes State Model Example • www.teachscape.com • Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching • Any Development Committee Member (Identified on Handbook)

  13. Questions?

More Related