1 / 9

Whiteness

Whiteness. Diversity Literacy Week 9. Prepared by Claire Kelly. “Inferential racism” (Hall cited in Peck, p. 93-94). Prepared by Claire Kelly.

remy
Download Presentation

Whiteness

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Whiteness Diversity Literacy Week 9 Prepared by Claire Kelly

  2. “Inferential racism” (Hall cited in Peck, p. 93-94) Prepared by Claire Kelly “… - those apparently naturalised representations of events and situations relating to race that have racist premises and propositions inscribed into them as a set of unquestioned assumptions” “….relative invisibility permits speakers to be ‘unaware’ of racist implications…” e.g. colourblindness > “naturalisation of whiteness”; “erases primary aspect of experience”; “participation in erasure”

  3. How inferential racism works Prepared by Claire Kelly • dominant discourses =“set parameters around content, relations and identities in the talk about racism” (p. 96) • Liberalism • “cultural code of the individual” • Primacy and autonomy of the individual • Closes down possibility of groupoppression • Therapeutic mode • “lack of self esteem” • Political (racism) > psychological (prejudice) • Self directed rather than socially directed solution • Religious discourse • “unity over division” • Shutting down of anger > understanding and forgiveness Change self not society!

  4. “Dysconcious racism” (King, p. 128) Prepared by Claire Kelly • “impaired consciousness” • “….form of racism that tacitly accepts white norms and privileges.” • “Uncritical ways of thinking about racial inequity accept certain culturally sanctioned assumptions, myths and beliefs that justify the social and economic advantages white people have as a result of subordinating others” (ibid.) • e.g. not recognisingthat opportunity linked to individuals willingness to assimilate, misrecognising the links between race, gender and class

  5. Prepared by Claire Kelly All of these modes of racism depend on white privilege…

  6. Privilege Prepared by Claire Kelly “When one group has something of value that is denied to others simplybecause of the groups they belong to” (McIntosh) Privilege is structural Privilege is unearned, you don’t do anything for it Social position versus subjective experience: The power of privilege is that it rarely experienced as such. “…question[ing] inevitably challenges the self identity of white people who have internalised these ideological justifications.” (King, p. 128)

  7. Whiteness Prepared by Claire Kelly “Whiteness was a modernist construction, central to the colonisation project, and achieved through the exorcism of everything black, particularly African, from white identity” (Steyn, p. 150) “the master narrative of whiteness: the conception of whiteness as ‘absolutely centered, unitary, masculine.’” (Steyn citing Owens, p. 150)

  8. Whiteness in contestation Prepared by Claire Kelly • Whiteness under challenge • Not unitary • Fluid and contested through history (Sacks; Steyn) • Alternative narratives vs. • Whiteness under reconstitution • Through ‘taste’ (Dolby) • Persisting heirarchies of sexual desirability (Barna & Pattman) • White liberalism (Biko) • Semigration (Ballard) > Everyday, inferential and dysconcious etc. racisms

  9. Prepared by Claire Kelly “One of the more general lessons of history is that human groups can sometimes transcend the past and adapt to circumstances in unanticipated ways. If enlightened self-interest can induce whites to abdicate their privileged position, they may still be able to call themselves South Africans twenty-five, fifty or even a hundred years hence.” George M. Frederickson

More Related