1 / 22

Johne’s Disease Update:

Johne’s Disease Update:. Steve Hendrick, DVM, DVSc Thursday, April 14 th , 2005. Outline:. Johne’s Disease Background Impact on Production Risk Factors Conclusions. Johne’s Disease:. Johne’s Disease:. Ontario Cows: 2.2%, Herds: 10% ( Tremblay et al., 2001)

renate
Download Presentation

Johne’s Disease Update:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Johne’s Disease Update: Steve Hendrick, DVM, DVSc Thursday, April 14th, 2005

  2. Outline: • Johne’s Disease • Background • Impact on Production • Risk Factors • Conclusions

  3. Johne’s Disease:

  4. Johne’s Disease: • Ontario • Cows: 2.2%, Herds: 10% (Tremblay et al., 2001) • Cows: 7% (McNab et al., 1991) • Atlantic Provinces • Cows: 16% (McKenna et al., 2004) • Cows: 1.6%, Herds: 17% (VanLeeuwen et al., 2001) • Alberta • Cows: 7% (Sorensen et al., 2003)

  5. Prevalence: 50 randomly selected dairy herds: MilkSerum Cow-level: 1.7% 2.6% Herd-level*: 18% 30% * 2 or more positive cows per herd

  6. Johne’s Disease: • Production limiting disease • Milk production, longevity, fertility, milk quality • International trade barriers • Crohn’s Disease ???

  7. Production: • Milk Production • Decreased: • Nordlund et al., 1996; • Sweeney et al., 1994 • Increased: • McNab et al., 1991; • Benedictus et al., 1987 • Culling • Increased risk • Wilson et al., 1993

  8. 305-day Milk Production: Controlled for: parity, DIM, SCC-LS, and herd. * significant at p<0.05

  9. Culling: Controlled for: parity, DIM, milk production, pregnancy status, SCC-LS, and herd. * significant at p<0.05

  10. Partial Budget: • Assumptions: • 100 cow dairy herd • 10% fecal culture positive • 10 infected cows + 90 non-shedding cows • annual culling rate of 30% • average milk price = $60/HL • cost of a replacement heifer = $1,200 • slaughter value: • non-infected cows: $200 • Infected cows: $0

  11. Partial Budget: • Culling: • Non-infected herd: • 30% of 100 cows = 30 cows • Infected herd: • 30% of 90 non-shedding cows = 27 cows • 90% of 10 fecal positive cows = 9 cows • 6 additional culls • 6 x $1,200 per heifer = $7,200 extra for replacements • 9 infected culls: • 9 x $200 opportunity cost = $1,800 • Sub-total = $9,000 36 cows

  12. Partial Budget: • Milk Production: • 550 kg (5.5 HL) of lost milk for each infected cow (fecal culture) • 10 cows x 5.5 HL/cow x $60/HL = $3,300 • Total: • $9,000 + $3,300 = $12,300 • equates to $123 per cow ($100 USD) • $100-200 USD per cow (Ott et al., 1999) • $49 per cow (Chi et al, 2002)

  13. Other Johne’s Frustrations: • Treatment: • None are efficacious and cost-effective • Diagnosis: • Sub-clinical infections: • difficult to identify - all tests lack sensitivity • Prevention and Control: • What are the important control points?

  14. Johne’s Risk Factors: • Calf housing and feeding • Calving pen cleanliness • Herd size and purchased replacement cattle • History of clinical disease • Housing of periparturient cows • Soil type or pH • Access to wildlife • Cow nutrition and water sources

  15. Johne’s Risk Factors: aevaluated both premix and controlled-release capsule usage

  16. Risk Factors: In herds with a history of Johne’s disease:

  17. Risk Factors: In herds with no prior history of Johne’s disease: aevaluated both premix and controlled-release capsule usage

  18. Take Home Message: • Prevalence of Johne’s disease in Ontario: • Higher than previously reported • 1 out of 3 farms are infected

  19. Take Home Message: • Production Impacts: • Milk: loss of 150 to 550 kg (2-6%) • Culling: removed 2 to 3 times faster • Partial Budget: ~$120 per cow in the herd

  20. Take Home Message: • Prevention: • avoid purchase of replacement cattle • Control: • maternity pen: • reduce time in maternity pen by calf • heifer rearing: • housing of heifer calves • springing heifer cleanliness • monensin sodium usage ???

  21. Acknowledgements: • Ontario Dairy Producers • Veterinary Practitioners • Advisory Committee: • Dr. Todd Duffield, Dr. Dave Kelton, Dr. Kerry Lissemore, Dr. Ken Leslie, Dr. Marie Archambault • Technical Assistants

  22. Questions?

More Related