1 / 6

Group 4: Institutional Collaboration

Group 4: Institutional Collaboration. Group members: Bihini Won wa Musiti (IUCN) Jean-Pierre Agnangoye (RAPAC) Didier Dervers (UMD) Richard Carroll (WWF) Brian Curran (WCS) Lisa Steel (WWF) Bas Huijbregts (WWF) (IUCN). Three levels of collaboration. Consortium Planning Team

rex
Download Presentation

Group 4: Institutional Collaboration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Group 4: Institutional Collaboration Group members: • Bihini Won wa Musiti (IUCN) • Jean-Pierre Agnangoye (RAPAC) • Didier Dervers (UMD) • Richard Carroll (WWF) • Brian Curran (WCS) • Lisa Steel (WWF) • Bas Huijbregts (WWF) • (IUCN)

  2. Three levels of collaboration • Consortium • Planning Team • Service Providers/Cross-cutters

  3. Consortium Question/Problem: Role/Responsibility of Consortium leader • Need for ToR for Landscape Leader and for ToR for non-lead Consortium members • By-laws including conflict resolution hierarchy • Durability of different structures

  4. Planning Team Problem: • How to integrate CARPE landscape planning into the Plan de Convergence/COMIFAC process? • How to integrate and harmonize CARPE landscape planning into different national LUP initiatives? • Who should participate/who should head planning team?

  5. Recommendations:COMIFAC • Revise ToR of National Coordination to be more inclusive of landscape planning process, stated inclusion in Plan de Convergence • Member of CARPE country team • Link LUP processes to COMIFAC via National Coordinators • Lobby for recognition of landscape planning process (e.g. pilot sites for nat’l level “macro-zonage” processes)

  6. Recommendations (continued) • Lobby for support expansion/renforcement of national level COMIFAC coordination from other partners (French or upcoming german facilitation?)

More Related