120 likes | 308 Views
The Relation of Negative Life Events to Symptoms and Functioning in Adolescents and Young Adults with a Childhood History of Chronic Abdominal Pain. Presentation by: Gerianna Kneeland. Chronic abdominal pain.
E N D
The Relation of Negative Life Events to Symptoms and Functioning in Adolescents and Young Adults with a Childhood History of Chronic Abdominal Pain Presentation by: Gerianna Kneeland
Chronic abdominal pain • Defined as intermittent or constant abdominal pain of at least 3 months duration (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2005) • Psychosocial factors influence illness in CAP patients • Negative life events • Competence may serve as moderator
Hypotheses • 1) higher levels of personal stress will be associated with poorer patient outcomes at follow-up including more emotional symptoms, somatic symptoms, and disability • 2) personal competence will moderate the effect of life stress on patient outcomes, such that life stress will be associated with poorer outcomes in patients with low competence compared to those with high competence
Method • Recruited from research database • Telephone Interview • Online Surveys • Data analysis assessed by health interview and online surveys
Measures • SF-36 Health Survey- assesses functioning and emotions of participants • Child/adult Somatization Inventory-assesses the severity of nonspecific somatic symptoms most commonly reported by children with chronic abdominal pain • Functional Disability Inventory- assesses the extent to which functional disability limits a child in different activities
Measures (cont.) • Life Events Questionnaire (LEQ)- assesses negative life events in the past year • Self-Perception Profile For Adults/Adolescents- assesses perceived global and domain-specific competence
Results • 218 CAP patients • 12-32 years • 57.8% female • 40.7% male • 90.8% Caucasian • 7.8% other
Results Hypothesis #1 (Life stress predicts poor outcomes) • SF-36 p-value of .001* and ß of -.292 • CSI- p-value of .007* and ßof .188 • FDI- p-value of .074 Hypothesis #2(Competence moderates effect of life stress) • CSI- p-value of .035* • SF-36 p-value of .236 • FDI- p-value of .148 *p<.05
Results Figure 1. The two-way interaction effect of stress and competence on CSI scores C S I S C O R E S High competence Low competence Low stress high stress Low stress
Limitations • Competence is a self-report measure • Cross-sectional study • Life events were assessed for year preceding interview • Limited generalizability
Future directions • Other factors moderating effect of life stress • Turn towards a prospective design
Acknowledgements • Dr. Lynn Walker • Grace Shelby, doctoral student assistant • Dr. Craig Smith