1 / 30

Upcoming challenges: flame retardants

Upcoming challenges: flame retardants. Stamatis Sivitos, 30.10.2013 UK SNS annual event. Outline. Background. IEC 62368/ 60065 and EN 60065 Amendment 11. Aims of this meeting. Background and update on current developments Call for your support Share information/ brainstorm

rhea
Download Presentation

Upcoming challenges: flame retardants

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Upcoming challenges: flame retardants Stamatis Sivitos, 30.10.2013 UK SNS annual event

  2. Outline

  3. Background

  4. IEC 62368/ 60065 and EN 60065 Amendment 11

  5. Aims of this meeting • Background and update on current developments • Call for your support • Share information/ brainstorm • Need for coordinated approach – counteraction

  6. Products affected

  7. Is there a need for this clause?

  8. “How eight TV fires spread across the world” Source: Chicago Tribune reporting

  9. Source: Chicago Tribune reporting

  10. Source: Chicago Tribune reporting

  11. Source: Chicago Tribune reporting

  12. Use of statistics Source: Green Science Policy Institute, Berkeley, USA

  13. Why is this important?

  14. Flameretardants

  15. Environmental pathways

  16. Health and env. impacts Serious adverse health effects in experimental animals and accumulation in humans - documented in many hundreds of peer reviewed articles (Blum et al , 2008 – The Case against Candle Resistant Electronics)

  17. Otherenv impacts • Plastic products containing FR are hard to recycle • Flame retarded plastic is either being incinerated, landfilled, or exported to developing countries

  18. What about the legal framework?

  19. EU legislation • RoHS Directive & REACH Regulation: banned or restricted only a small fraction of the chemicals of concern • Complicated and long process via REACH • Applicable only in the EU => Regulatory framework not sufficient

  20. Views of US organisations • Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) • National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) • Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) • Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) “potential risk was too low to justify the implementation of a candle flame ignition requirement”

  21. The coalition (Blum et al , 2008 – The Case against Candle Resistant Electronics)

  22. ECOS work • Alerted the relevant standardisation bodies (CENELEC & IEC) • Contacted the national members of IEC and CENELEC, providing the relevant scientific input • Raised awareness among env NGOs in the EU

  23. Outcomes

  24. State of play

  25. Conclusions

  26. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION! Mundo-B Rue d’Edimbourg 26, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium Direct line: + 32 2 894 46 56 stamatis.sivitos@ecostandard.org http://www.ecostandard.org

  27. Environmental protection through standards • Highlight potential impact of standards being developed • Specific role of standards vs regulation for better environmental performance • How do they make a difference in day to day business operations

More Related