1 / 22

Colin Darch and Karin de Jager University of Cape Town

Reconfiguring the researcher-librarian relationship: evaluating South Africa’s ‛Library Academy’ experience. Colin Darch and Karin de Jager University of Cape Town. Context: Research Libraries Consortium. Project funding – Carnegie Corporation of NY Two 3-year cycles – 2006-09, 2009-12;

Download Presentation

Colin Darch and Karin de Jager University of Cape Town

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reconfiguring the researcher-librarian relationship: evaluating South Africa’s ‛Library Academy’ experience Colin Darch and Karin de JagerUniversity of Cape Town

  2. Context: Research Libraries Consortium • Project funding – Carnegie Corporation of NY • Two 3-year cycles – 2006-09, 2009-12; • Cape Town, KwaZulu-Natal and Witwatersrand • Pretoria, Rhodes and Stellenbosch • Further expansion unlikely (design too specific)

  3. Context: Research Libraries Consortium • Commons (physical space) • Portal (virtual space) • Academy and US Internships (librarians) • No direct equity component • Intensive • Transformative • But inadequate in isolation • Question: what is the character of the intervention?

  4. More Context: South African Research • Need to improve research output • Is a Government policy objective • Innovation  economic development • Cadre of aging researchers • not being replaced • not demographically representative • gender, race, language • Crisis of secondary education • Reconfiguring of HE landscape

  5. More context: South African LIS education • Mostly undergraduate professional degrees • B.Bibl., B.Tech. • Weak subject domain knowledge • LIS schools closing down • LIS schools shift towards teaching • IT skills  • Knowledge management  • Little disciplinary content  • One (LIS education) size fits all • academic specialisation , research skills 

  6. The Research Commons and the Portal • Overall RLC objective: “to improve support for researchers in South African university libraries” • Dedicated virtual space – Research Portal • Dedicated physical space – Research Commons

  7. ... and a Library Academy • Aimed at mid-career librarians • Improvement in subject knowledge • Personal experience of research • Growth in confidence • Leadership • Able to support research • How to achieve this?

  8. The Academy and the US Internships • Our solution in two parts: • Residential Academy, two weeks • Not about skills or training • Exposure to research journeys in different domains • Exposure to epistemology (not all positivism) • The US internships • Selected from Academy participants • MortensonCenter at UIUC, as group, two weeks • 4-6-week individual placements at ARL libraries • Lots of report-back channels

  9. The Academy Venue Montfleur Conference Centre, near Stellenbosch

  10. The Library Academy as a Concept • Partly an intervention re: LIS education in SA • LIS schools not producing academic librarians • Very little debate • Partly a conventional CPE intervention • educational activities ... designed to keep practicing ... professionals abreast of their particular domain ... and to provide them with training in new fields (Pors and Schreiber 1997) • writing a paper ... considerable research and study ... integral part of CPE (Weingand 2000) • mentoring ... necessary for successful CPE (Houle 1980) • varied and complementary learning patterns (Houle 1980); wide range of activities ... designed to meet identified ... needs (Varleijs 2008) • broadening of content to include ... recreation (Houle 1980)

  11. The Academy Throughput • Four Academies have been held • Some attrition (11 participants have left) • Fifth is in process (October 2011)

  12. Writing a Paper: Experiential Learning • Required of all participants • Potentially publishable ... • Any topic: LIS, non-LIS • Difficulty in identifying a research question • Unprepared for peer review • Outcome: range of published papers; specialissue of Innovation

  13. Some Academy Participants, 2010

  14. Medium-term evaluation • Self-evaluation not sufficiently objective • Some quantifiable data required • Library Directors or Deputies charged with RLC liaison have clearest insight into changes of attitude and behaviour in the workplace • Best able to provide impact assessment • Online instrument developed • Each respondent answered questions about their own individual staff members - by name • Data collected about 67 participants

  15. Survey instrument • Structured according to RLC key target areas: • Personal development: • Increase in confidence • Leadership development • Research proficiency • Increased contact with researchers • Development of subject knowledge • Conference presentation; and Publication • Professional development • Pro-active use & promotion of new technologies • More effective communication with library staff • Job promotion

  16. Personal development • Have the participants shown an improvement in leadership since the Academy? • In your judgement, have the following participants shown a significant increase in professional and personal confidence since participating in the Academy? (n=67)

  17. Research proficiency • Since the Academy, have the participants become pro-active in pursuing closer contact with researchers and/or graduate students, up to and including active collaboration in research projects? • Have any of the persons listed taken steps to improve their subjectknowledge or expertise since they attended the Academy? • Have any of the participants presented a paper at an academic conference, either on LIS or in another discipline, since the Academy? • Have any of the following participants published an article since participating in the Academy?

  18. Perceived research proficiency

  19. Professional development • Have the participants shown an improvement in communication skills and sharing with colleagues since the Academy? • Since the Academy, have participants pro-actively used existing or emerging Web or Internet technologies to promote library or research activity? • Which Academy participants have been promoted since attending, and as a consequence of the Academy?

  20. Perceived professional development BUT: “[t]he promotions are not necessarily a consequence of the Academy. They are part of a larger library reorganization exercise as well as an appointment to a vacant management position. The Academy experience may have contributed but it is difficult to establish the link.”

  21. Constraints • Research libraries under threat in SA: • Researchers don’t all view libraries as essential • Researchers don’t need librarians (or think they don’t) • Many academic librarians have little subject knowledge • Often unable to provide specialised research support • Time frame of our investigation fairly short

  22. Conclusion Yet our results show that a short, intensive intervention can make a measurable difference: • to the way librarians perceive their role • to the way they work • to the way they engage with their clients Which can also have an impact on the national research enterprise. Thank you

More Related