1 / 30

A practical approach to Sea Traffic Management in the Arctic

A practical approach to Sea Traffic Management in the Arctic Per Setterberg, project manager MICE activity leader MONALISA. Sea Traffic Management in the Arctic Why – What – How. Is situational awareness in the Arctic vital?.

rian
Download Presentation

A practical approach to Sea Traffic Management in the Arctic

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A practical approach to Sea Traffic Management in the Arctic Per Setterberg, project manager MICEactivity leader MONALISA

  2. Sea Traffic Management in the Arctic Why – What – How

  3. Issituationalawarenessin the Arctic vital?

  4. Reducing the risk of collisions […] requires a monitoring system that provides continual and proactive decision-making support for navigators. MattiasRust, Maritime Officer at the World Wildlife Fund (WWF). http://www.sjofartsverket.se/mice

  5. Action: … • Analyse the Arctic operating environment and security arrangements from the perspective of comprehensive concept of security, and develop shared situation awareness. http://vnk.fi/julkaisukansio/2013/j-14-arktinen-15-arktiska-16-arctic-17-saame/PDF/en.pdf

  6. With more activities in the Arctic, there is an increasing need to monitor and understand how such activities affect the security of Canada’s marine transportation system. Situational awareness is key to decision-making, not only for security purposes but also for safety, environmental and economic reasons. http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/marinesecurity/initiatives-391.htm,

  7. Development towards increased shipping in Arctic waters involves agreater risk for accidents… Greater awareness of traffic at sea, in the air and on land helps to reduce the risks of accidents. Active efforts in terms of preventive measures, surveillance and rapid accident response can reduce the risks… http://www.government.se/content/1/c6/16/78/59/3baa039d.pdf

  8. In order to meet the greatest number of requirement drivers and supportsustainable Arctic growth safely, the CMTS recommends that the United States make it a priority [to] support maritime domain awareness, for vessel monitoring and vessel management schemes… http://www.cmts.gov/downloads/CMTS_Arctic_MTS_Report_Narrative.pdf

  9. Whatissituationalawareness? • Traffic situation – who is where

  10. Whatissituationalawareness? • Traffic situation – who is where • Intentions • Follow-upAwareness needsto beforward-looking! And that’s Sea Traffic Management…

  11. Sea Traffic Management – the movie: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxUrtmQ3jk4

  12. Whoneedsthis Arctic forward-lookingawareness? • Cargoowners and passengers • Shipping companies • Insurance companies • Maritimeauthorities…

  13. …somecaptains… Source: Daily Mail Online,

  14. …and theseguys!

  15. MICE – the movie http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUhOCJE2anI

  16. Doesforward-lookingawarenessin the Arctic pose a challange? • It’sremote • It’sharsh • Communications areunreliable and expensive… (Or not. We’ll come back tothat.)

  17. Forward-lookingawareness • Earlywarnings • Corrective action • Breakingchainsof events! Butonlyifwecan do itin real(ish)time!

  18. By the way, what is real(ish)time? Well, wewent over the top: • 15 sec. – 3 min. update intervals • 3-5 sec. latency • 0,04 % downtime > 6 min. IcebreakerOden’s 28 dayjourney Sweden – Greenland and back, August 2013.

  19. The business case, today • Leasing-price, all inclusive:30-50 USD/day(50 % ofwhich is data trafficcosts - Iridium)

  20. The business case, tomorrow • Substantialcostreduction potential • Route exchange and messagingstandard in nav equipment (MONALISA) • Sharingofcommunicationlink (LRIT and SSIS requirements)

  21. The business case, future • Satellite AIS • Real(er) timemonitoring(today: no 24/7 satellitecoverage) • Shorterlatency(today: aiming at 30 minutes) • Satellite VHF? Commsto the ship?

  22. The business case, upside Example

  23. The business case, upside • LNG from Melkøyato Yokohama • NSR instead of Suez • Full roundvoyage - Spot market rate, including NSR fees • Savings USD 8 264 000 Source: http://chnl.no/publish_files/Henrik_Falck.pdf

  24. The business case, upside In conclusion: Savings: 8 million USD/round-trip Minus 30 to 50 USD/day(present onboardcostestimates, MICE) = Still 8 million USD

  25. Butwhatabout the § ? Article 234 of UNCLOS, ice-covered areas: In such areas, coastal states have the right to adopt and enforce non-discriminatory laws and regulations for the prevention, reduction and control of marine pollution from vessels within the limits of the exclusive economic zone (EEZ).

  26. So, let’s come together… EEZ’sof the Arctic coastalstates

  27. Take-away #1 WHY? Arctic shipping must be Safe and Environmental, Efficient and Economical.

  28. Take-away #2 HOW? MICE bringsforward-lookingawarenesstoremoteplaces. Today.

  29. Take-away #3 THE COSTS? Right on the money!

  30. ThankYou! Per SetterbergInnovation CoordinatorSwedish Maritime AdministrationMob +46 708 191242per.setterberg@sjofartsverket.se Project web sitewww.sjofartsverket.se/mice

More Related