Kongresni trg 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Tel: (+386 1) 241 86 04 Fax: (+386 1) 241 86 50

1. Univerza v Ljubljani Kongresni trg 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Tel: (+386 1) 241 86 04Fax: (+386 1) 241 86 50 E-mail: ul-rektorat@uni-lj.si Rector:Prof Andreja Kocijančič, Ph.D. Vice-Rectors:Prof Julijana Kristl, Ph.D. Prof Peter Maček, Ph.D.Prof Ivan Svetlik, Ph.D. Secretary General:Mihaela Kranjc, univ. grad. iur.

2. Neva ŠlibarThe Triple Responsibility for Bologna • Introduction and Presentation – Ljubljana University in the Slovenian HE Area • The Bologna Process in Slovenia: achievements and shortcomings where we are and where we are heading to • The Triple Responsibility – deliberations on how to make the Bologna Process a success

3. A brief history of the university Despite tradition going back to 1595 and 1619, the existing University of Ljubljana was founded as a Slovenian university only in 1919 after the disintegration of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The university began to develop rapidly after WW2 and has been gradually growing to the present size and complexity. Because of its historical development, UL is not a campus type university; the premises have been built in different periods and are well spread all over Ljubljana. The National and University Library and the Central Technical Library are associate members.

4. University of Ljubljana in numbers University of Ljubljana is a large comprehensivetraditional European type research oriented university with more than: • 58 000 undergraduate students, • 5 200 postgraduate students, • 4 000 teaching and research staff • 1 450 administrative staff on 26 members schools: • 22 faculties covering social, natural and technical sciences • 3 academies of art • 1 university college for health care

5. Faculties, colleges and academies • Faculty of Computer and Information Science • Faculty of Social Work • Faculty of Mechanical Engineering • Faculty of Sport • Faculty of Administration • Faculty of Arts • Faculty of Medicine • Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering • Faculty of Education • Faculty of Law • Theological Faculty • Veterinary Faculty • University College of Health Care • Academy of Music • Academy of Theatre, Radio, Film and Television • Academy of Fine Arts • Biotechnical Faculty • Faculty of Economics • Faculty of Architecture • Faculty of Social Sciences • Faculty of Electrical Engineering • Faculty of Pharmacy • Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy • Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology • Faculty of Mathematics and Physics • Faculty of Maritime Studies and Transport

6. Filozofska fakulteta – Faculty of Arts and Humanities

7. Filozofska fakulteta in numbers: founded in 1919 as part of 1st University in SLO • 21 departments: 31 programmes (subject areas), 16 postgr. programmes • one-degree and two-degree studies • teacher training programmes • over 700 combinations of two-degree studies (also with TeoF and FDV) • ca. 7000 students, ca. 600 staff University size: difficult to agree on anything!

8. Before Bologna: 1997-2000(re)designing curricula introducing ECTS, course-options, course-types • Joint project: envolvement of the whole faculty in (re)designing curricula/programmes according to: • ECTS – 60 credits: not contact hours, but partly work load • New: 4 „pillars“, i.e. types of courses (basic, intensifying, optional: internal – external) • New: possibility for students to choose modules and combine options according to their interests and needs (employment)

9. The never ended story: 2001- 2003 accreditation process failed due to QUALITY • decision of the University and Council for HE: ECTS – model of allocating credits to number of hours • FF-model considered exemplary, but too thorough changes: new programmes, therefore not validated • Exercise for Bologna part two • ESF: ca. 180.000 € for Bologna-projects

10. Bologna at the University of Ljubljana and in Slovenia: 2004 – 2005 • 3 faculties forced in december 2004 Bologna like programmes through accreditation – actual legal problems and practical problems with implementation • no obligatory cycle structure – differences: conservative – radical change • quantity for quality? • legal framework developed too slowly and not consistently • partial interests tend to destroy positive challenges and good solutions

11. Bologna II at FF and many other faculties: 2004-2006Tuning methodology, learning outcomes, competences, profiles, 3 cycle-structure • FF decisions: 3+2 for one-degree programmes 4+1 for two-degree programmes 5+0 for teacher training, esp. two-degree programmes • Learning outcomes: defining profiles and competences • Consultation with stakeholders: students, graduates, employers • Employability: greater flexibility through optional courses

12. Bologna at UL now: achievements • Diploma Supplement • Erasmus-Socrates exchange growing • Legal framework – work in progress: new proactive attitude of UL (2 standards for accreditation and ECTS were passed) • Recognition frameworks and agencies • Interuniversitary accreditation: formal framework, evaluation process specified • General awareness raising – students, employers

13. Bologna at UL now and in the near future: general problems • Balance between academic qualities and economic demands • University autonomy – accountability - employability • Teaching – Research – Practise • Macroeconomic demands - national interests – academic values • Improve and invest into teacher training along the whole vertical axis

14. Bologna at UL, FF now and in the near future: concrete problems • Financing: • change to individualized studies calls for more staff • better equipment – IKT – change in HE didactics • space !!! • Logistics: technical, administrative • Accreditation • Quality Asessment and Self-Evaluation • Student and graduate envolvement

15. Bologna Process a Success: Necessary Partnership of 3 Spheres Higher Education Institutions Stakeholders/Partners: Students/Graduates State/Local “Economy” Authorities Employers

16. Public responsibility of HE and for HE • OF HEI – Universities: (A. Schoenenberger) • AUTONOMY - ACCOUNTABILITY • Three core functions of Universities: • Learning and teaching • increase of human capital (investment) • entertainment services (consumption) • Scientific research • knowledge production (theoretical/empirical) • information storage • Provision of services to third parties

17. Public responsibility of HEI… • …and their impacts (missions) e.g. World Declaration on Higher Education (UNESCO) • qualified and responsible citizens to meet the needs of all sectors of human activities; • optimal range of choice and flexibility for the individual development; • provision of relevant expertise to society in cultural, social, economic development; • help protect and enhance societal values that form the basic democratic citizenship.

18. Public responsibility FOR HEI • Triple responsibility of: PR of national, regional, local authorities and public NGOs (professional and social) • Legal: create the framework regulations, accreditation and quality assurance agencies, ensure the cooperation of all 3 spheres • Financial: provide the resources; helas, hidden agenda: diminuishing not increasing of the budget for HE; misunderstanding of the importance of economical investmest in education and research – knowledge based society (see papers by Luc Weber and Alain Schoenenberger) • Moral: create equal opportunities, social cohesion, democratic culture, economic development etc.

19. Responsibility of the Economic Sectors, „World of Work“ • Opening up of universities and HEIs: curriculum design, mobility, employability, applicability, LLL: OUTPUT-driven • Profiles and competences • Change in self-awareness of HEIs: accountability and empowerment • Dialogue with stakeholders and partners: communicational problems • Active co-operation of all three spheres necessary for the Bologna process to become a success story for Europe

20. Thank You for Your attention! “But since there is but one aim for the entire state, it follows that education must be one and the same for all, and that the responsibility for it must be a public one, not the private affaire which it now is”. Aristotle (The Politics).