1 / 17

Recovery Oriented Systems of Care Implementation Plan

Recovery Oriented Systems of Care Implementation Plan. Maryland Recovery Workgroup October 2008. Maryland Recovery Workgroup. ADAA Director selected members representing county coordinators, providers, recovery community, recovery advocates

rianne
Download Presentation

Recovery Oriented Systems of Care Implementation Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Recovery Oriented Systems of Care Implementation Plan Maryland Recovery Workgroup October 2008

  2. Maryland Recovery Workgroup • ADAA Director selected members representing county coordinators, providers, recovery community, recovery advocates • Task: develop an implementation plan for recovery oriented systems of care in Maryland

  3. Recovery Workgroup Members • Tom Cargiulo– Director, Howard County Substance Abuse Services • Dave Ennis – Western Region Manager, ADAA • Carlos Hardy – Executive Director, National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence, Maryland Chapter • Sue Jenkins – Central Region Manager, ADAA • Yngvild Olsen, MD – Acting Deputy Health Officer, Harford County Health Department • Arnold Ross – Director of Administration, Baltimore Substance Abuse Systems • Rebecca Ruggles – Open Society Institute • Bill Rusinko – Research Director, ADAA • Suzan Swanton – Executive Director, Maryland State Drug and Alcohol Abuse Council • Christina Trenton – Director, Carroll County Long-Term Treatment Center

  4. Workgroup Process • Recovery Workgroup established in November 2007 • What can Maryland do to establish a more recovery-oriented system of care? • Obtain stakeholder input from every jurisdiction – focus groups • Develop an implementation plan by October 2008

  5. Focus Groups • What exists in your community? • What services are absent? • What works well? • What doesn’t work?

  6. Focus Group Members • Treatment Providers • Members of the Recovery Community • Advocates • Family Members • Support Service Providers

  7. Implementation Plan • Goals and Objectives • SWOT Analysis • Focus Group data • Recommendations

  8. Goal: Engage Stakeholder Groups • Involve system stakeholders in system planning, implementation, and evaluation • Who? Representatives of the recovery community and their families, advocates, treatment and support service providers

  9. Goal: Engage Stakeholder Groups • State Level - • Involve stakeholders in planning, implementing and evaluating ADAA policies and practices • Require stakeholder involvement in planning, implementation and evaluation of local services funded by the State • Create opportunities for coalitions of traditional and nontraditional providers to obtain funding for combined services

  10. Goal: System Education • Raise awareness and promote understanding of Recovery Oriented Systems of Care models throughout the prevention and treatment systems, service provider systems, recovery community and broader community.

  11. Goal: System Education • State Level – • Offer courses and workshops to providers • Recruit and train trainers • Obtain curricula from other states, develop new curricula as needed • Become a clearinghouse for resource materials, speakers

  12. Goal: Assign Responsibility for Guiding Transformation • Multiple step, comprehensive process benefits from cohesive leadership at state and community level • State Level - ADAA staff designated to coordinate, guided by steering committee

  13. Goal: Define Standards for Services • State Level – • Operationalize characteristics of recovery-friendly services at all levels of treatment, and for all types of recovery support services. • Provide self-assessment tools that service providers can use to evaluate their programs and develop improvement plans • Connect program self assessment and development of a change plan to funding opportunities

  14. Goal: Change Funding Priorities • State Level – • Apply for Access to Recovery grant funds that will enable ADAA to pay for recovery support services • Buy services that demonstrate alignment with a recovery oriented system of care

  15. Goal: Collaborate with Other Agencies • State Level – • Identify and resolve conflicting policies and practices to remove barriers to utilization of services • Collaborate to jointly fund clusters of services

  16. Goal: Collect Data that Measure Recovery Outcomes • Modify the existing data system (SMART) to enable us to collect and analyze data that measure milestones in the process of recovery

  17. Goal: Collect Data that Measure Recovery Outcomes • State Level – • Redefine what constitutes an episode of treatment • Measure and reward successful linkages among services • Obtain data from nontraditional and recovery support service providers • Define recovery outcomes beyond current measures

More Related