460 likes | 571 Views
Where will our food come from?. A discussion of the need to preserve farmland in the Central Valley of California. AGST 3000 Agriculture, Society and the Natural World. Overpowering Factor affecting Farmland Preservation…. Population and Urban Growth 58 Counties in California.
E N D
Where will our food come from? A discussion of the need to preserve farmland in the Central Valley of California. AGST 3000 Agriculture, Society and the Natural World
Overpowering Factor affecting Farmland Preservation… Population and Urban Growth 58 Counties in California
Central Valley: 18 Counties (Shasta –Kern ) 42,000 square miles 450 miles long (ex. Boston to Washington) 40-60 miles wide over 5.5 million population (2000)
San Joaquin Valley: 8 Counties 27,276 square miles 270 miles long 1- Northern San Joaquin Valley: (San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced) 2- Southern San Joaquin Valley: ( Madera, Tulare, Kings, Fresno, Kern) Sacramento Valley: (2 parts) Sacramento Metro - urban in character North Sacramento Valley Land and climate changes – growing changes, uniqueness to valleys and areas
Air quality bases (air region-basin) • Inversions and air flows • Sacramento Valley Air Basin • San Joaquin Air Basin • Airflow/pollution…where?
Watersheds: (all rivers flow North) 1-Sacramento River 2-San Joaquin River 3-Tulare/Kings Where do they all end up?
Common characteristics of the valley region Agriculture- linkage Diversity 30% employment
Remember… California is the most productive ag state ( # 1 in production) San Joaquin valley produces ½ of states total in its 8 counties 6 of 8 counties produce more than a billion dollars/ year Entire Central Valley produces 2/3 of states production
Valley Characteristics Common Themes
1 – Fast paced population growth California 1950-2000 – 220% Valley 190.8% Stanislaus 251.3% Madera 233.1% Merced 201.7% Kern 189.8% Fresno 189.1% San Joaquin 180.7% Kings 176.8% Tulare 146.6%
2 – Increasing urbanization Bay Area commuters Prison Construction
3 – Increasing numbers of diverse populations Cultural differences Economic differences 4 – Increasing divergence Areas becoming different Diverging from coastal areas and the rest of the state 5 – Each county, city, and unincorporated community has a story to tell
Historical Growth in California 1950 – 1970 CA. 88.57% Valley not growing as fast (only 44%) Bay area and coastal areas – incredible growth 1970 – 2000 CA. 69.8% Valley – 103.1% Highest growth in the valley – Stanislaus, Merced, Fresno Madera (prison) 196.5%
Population Growth 1990 – 2000 CA. 13.8% Valley 20.5% Madera 39.8% Kings 27.6% Kern 21.4% Stanislaus 20.6% Highest shift from North Valley to South valley
Population growth – consequence of economic change…opportunity for a better life • 70’s – 2000 characterized by • Technology advances • Cold war ending • Contributed to the expansion of exports • Valley • 1 – low cost of living • affordable housing, • inland movement from coastal areas, • young families • 2 – higher birth rates • 3 – movement from abroad
Growth effects: • More retail • Crowded • Pollution • More consumer choices • Faster population growth within cities • Racially and ethnically changing • Diversity increased in valley • Highest in Tulare, Merced, Madera, Fresno, Kings
Urbanization in valley • …migration from coast • Future population projections in comparison … • 2000 – 2010 2020 • CA. 15.3% 31.2% • Valley 24.1% 51% • double in valley (7 million) by 2040 • What will that do to Agriculture in the Valley? • Fresno is #1 Ag county in USA 3.4 billion
Should we protect our Ag Land? • Preserve open space • Pollution/environment • By policy, farmland should be protected • ( policy protects land, not farmer)
1940 1954 1964 1975 1996 1925
California AgricultureUrbanization • Between 1997 and 2002 California lost 8,282 farms and 1,168,761 acres of farmland. Census of Agriculture, 2002
Central Valley AgricultureUrbanization 6 of the top ten fastest growing counties in California are in the Central Valley. All 7 San Joaquin Valley counties made it into the state’s top 20. California Department of Finance 2003
Central Valley AgricultureUrbanization From 1998-2000, the San Joaquin Valley led the state as a region in conversion of irrigated farmland to urban land- 8,072 acres (5,610 acres were prime ag land). FMMP, 2002
Central Valley HousingUnmet Housing Needs At the recent rate of construction, the followingpercentage of housing needs will be unmet from 2000 to 2010
Cost of Community Services Studies $1.11 $.31 $.29 Median cost--per dollar of revenue raised--to provide public services to different land uses. American Farmland Trust Saving American Farmland: What Works
How much land is being lost statewide? • 1992 – 1997…85,200 acres…Prime farmland • Increase from the previous 5 year period…15% • 500,000 acres of total farmland lost from 1988 to 1998 • Could lose a million more by 2040 • Conversion of prime farmland is 30% faster than non-prime farmland
Statewide Farmland Loss... • AFT classifies the Central California Valley as the most threatened farmland in the country • Urbanization could consume or indirectly affect over 3.6 million acres of irrigated land, more than half of the 6.7 million irrigated acres in the 11 counties that comprise the Central Valley floor (AFT survey) • Land converted to urban uses was 87,000 acres over a two year period 96-98. • 22% of all land converted to urbanization is prime farmland
Regional Picture Regionally – 10-11% of all prime farmland lost to urbanization in Valley Converted to urban use! (1996-98) Point is: Land is being developed at ever increasing rates---significant % of prime farmland is being destroyed
State mapping project • – designed to map California’s Land -- Used to determine 1 – how much Ag land is lost 2- what type of Ag land is being lost, quality of soil, access to water
Farmland Mapping • Assessment of farmland loss is for urban or other uses • 48% (half) of all state land is mapped • 98% of farmland is mapped • Have to break down – there are differences 1. Quality of soil for growing 2. Access to water (can land be irrigated?) 3. Topography (ex. Flat or sloped)
Water access for irrigation very important in classifying land. • Irrigation – best of best ( most useful ) • 1.5 million irrigated acres in California 62% (941,000) is in the Valley
Six categories of land: 1. Prime Farm land • most productive soil (highest quality) linked to higher yields and irrigation • precious commodity 2. Farmland of statewide importance • also irrigated land • Soil of slightly lesser quality 3. Unique Farmland • irrigated or non-irrigated • soil less productive
Six categories of land continued: 4. Farmland of local importance • each county can determine or have power to designate • board of supervisors can protect 5. Grazing land • livestock grazing • non-irrigated-poorest soil quality 6. Urban • built up land • was farmland and now is used for residential/commercial
Prime Farmland • Best land is prime farmland • 50% of whole state 4.3 million acres is prime farmland – • Out of 8.5 to 9 million acres of total farmland • In San Joaquin Valley – 49% of this prime farmland is in our 8 counties. (2.1 mil)
Farmland catagories… 1- Prime farmland- 4.3 million 2- Farmland of statewide Importance – 2 million 3- Unique – 1 million ½ of all #1,2,3 land is in our SJ Valley 8 counties! Why?...Soil, Water, Climate
As you recall… • CA. Valley is losing thousands of acres of prime farmland. • Same trend in Stanislaus County • Look at all the subdivisions • Commercial development • Retail • Patterns of growth pose a threat in the Central Valley. • Potential for urban/rural conflict • Controlled growth? • County must approve new cities, growth boundaries and annexations
Zone of conflict is urban edge… • For Example…N. Modesto- McHenry – • car dealer alley • ¼ community residential • ¼ transportation…roads • ¼ jurisdiction to point of sale…retail sales • ¼ Ag land now or ???
Interest statewide to protect prime farmland.. What are the options? • 1. Use regulatory powers of gov. (police power) to conserve land available (Green belts, environmental sensitive areas, Ag buffer zones) • 2. Use of special regional agencies that have control over boundaries of communities to protect farmland (Planning Commission).
More options? • 3. Use tax incentives for landowners and local govs. to conserve local land (Williamson Act) • 4. Use of innovative non-government tools to preserve land (transfer of developers rights/purchase of conservation easements). • Farmland Trust • 5. Linking of ag conservation to local economic development clusters… promotes better economic value (business)
Even more options? • 6. develop new ways of planning urban areas – smart growth into less “prime” land (General Plan) • 7. Sustain environment, encourage greater public involvement…(initiatives on the ballot, Ag buffer zones, Green belts) • best prime farmland is on boundaries of cities. • It lands on the edge - “zone of conflict” • keeps pushing the line (who?)
Local Zoning • Divides jurisdiction into parts (zones) • Establishes what is permitted, prohibited, permitted with permits • What happens if you change zoning (rezoning) – controversial with property rights
How to zone to protect ag? • Set up special Ag buffer zones (typically in counties) ie. Turlock, Merced, Ceres • Set minimum parcel size, not to go below a certain acreage (1, 5, 10, 20, 40) • Minimum parcel sizes have increased over the years to restrict rural development and farmland conversion
Reading Assignments… Nicolai V. Kuminoff, Alvin D. Sokolow and Daniel A. Sumner; Farmland Conversion: Perceptions and Realities . University of California Agricultural Issues Center; Davis, CA; Agricultural Issues Center Issues Brief; number 16; http://www.farmlandinfo.org/documents/29671/Brief_16.pdf Staley, Samuel R. The ‘Vanishing Farmland’ Myth and the Smart-Growth Agenda. Reason Public Policy Institute, January 2000. http://www.rppi.org/urban/pb12.pdf
Journal After reading the articles from the web and considering our conversation in class answer the following… In your opinion, do you think we should be concerned about the loss of agriculture land and why? In your opinion, what are the most promising options or tools to deal with this issue and why? Do you think that it is a viable alternative to allow our food source to be outside the United States and why? What is your general opinion concerning the class discussion on this issue?