1 / 31

NS4540 Winter Term 2016 Latin America Economic Overview

This article provides an overview of the current economic situation in Latin America, highlighting the challenges the region is facing after a decade of progress. It discusses the impact of the global economy, the decline in commodity prices, and the need for economic diversification and technological upgrades. The article also explores the region's good performance in terms of fiscal deficits, inflation, external debt, and social progress.

Download Presentation

NS4540 Winter Term 2016 Latin America Economic Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NS4540 Winter Term 2016Latin America Economic Overview

  2. Overview I Current economic situation in Latin America • After decade of social and economic progress, Latin America now facing a number of challenging issues • Not long ago LA was a success story • Advanced economies suffered severe recession during the 2008-09 financial crisis • Emerging economies including Latin America were seen as promise for renewed world economic growth • 2004-13 decade in many ways was exceptional in terms of economic growth – even more so in social progress • Some analysists refer to period as “Latin American decade” • Sharp contrast to “lost decade” of the 1980s when massive debt crisis sent region into a severe recession

  3. Overview II • Positive picture has changed dramatically • Growth per capita stopped in 2014 • Much of region now viewed with great concern • Sudden deterioration in region’s prospects • Reflects significant changes in global economy • Substantial decline in commodity prices which remain backbone of region’s exports, and • An overall moderation of global trade • If Latin American economies are to regain growth must • Undertake reforms to diversify economies and • Upgrade technologically • Both needed to make production structure less dependent on the behavior of commodities.

  4. Good Performance I Good performance Although 2004 marked the start of the so-called Latin American decade foundations being laid earlier Low fiscal deficits were rule in most countries since the 1990s: Strengthening of the tax bases facilitated a well financed expansion of social spending (which had contracted in 1980s) Inflation in region nearly 1,200% in 1990, had fallen to single digits by 2001 Most significant – sharp reduction in ratio of external debt to GDP that took place during 2004-08 At same time countries accumulated large foreign exchange reserves

  5. Good Performance II

  6. Good Performance III • Because low debt ratios make it more likely a nation can pay its borrowings on time it has permitted • Most Latin American countries extraordinary access to external financing • In the mid-2000s real interest rates on Latin American external borrowing returned to low levels not seen since the 1970s – before devastating debt crisis • Because of the prudent debt ratios • Monetary authorities in several countries were able to undertake expansionary policies to counter 2008-09 recession in advanced countries • All major central banks reduced their interest rates • Several governments increased public sector spending to expand domestic demand • Had the ability to counter business cycle rather than reinforcing it – unprecedented in region

  7. Good Performance IV • Economic growth averaged 5.2% from 2004 through middle of 2008 – best region experienced since 1968-74 • Accompanied by an investment boom in many countries • Investment as a % of GDP increased to levels only slightly below the peak reached prior to 1980s crisis • Higher if Brazil and Venezuela are excluded • After brief and sharp slowdown in 2009 – which was a full blown recession in some countries – Mexico • Growth recovered to an average 4.1% a year 2010-13. • For most countries truly exceptional growth occurred from 2004 to mid 2008 • Some countries, Panama, Peru and Uruguay experienced a full decade in which their economies grew at average annual rates of over 6% (2004-2013)

  8. Good Performance V

  9. Good Performance VI • Since the 1990s region as also experienced long-term improvements in human development • Stems from an increase in social spending as a % of GDP in all countries. • Increased social spending facilitated expansion of education, health and other social services. • Improvements can be characterized as a “democratic dividend” because they followed the broad-based return to democracy in Latin America in the 1980s • Most notable of the social improvements was a large reduction in poverty and related movements in • Labor markets, and • Income distribution

  10. Good Performance VII • Regional unemployment fell from 11.3% in 2003 to 6.2% in 2013 • Employment in the (unproductive) informal sector fell from 48.3% of total employment in 2002 to 44.0% in 2014 • The proportion of the population aged 15 to 64 with jobs increased by 4.6% • Also a remarkable improvement in income distribution in most Latin American countries • Not only a contrast with the region’s history but also • A divergence from the relatively generalized global increase in inequality in recent years.

  11. Good Performance VIII • This narrowing of inequality combined with economic growth resulted in a spectacular reduction in poverty levels and the rise of the middle class. • In 2002 the % of the Latin American population living in poverty was higher than in 1980 • But poverty declined by 16% over the ensuing decade – about half representing a decline in extreme poverty • As poverty fell the middle class (incomes between $10 and $50 a day) grew from about 23% of the population to 34%

  12. Good Performance IX • Still caution is called for • Labor market informality still predominates in many countries • Improvements in income distribution for the most part a reversal of the growing inequality during the 1980s and 1990s • Even with the improvements in inequality, Latin America continues to have among worst income distributions in the world. • Increases in the availability of education and health care has not been matched by improvements in quality of services • LA students rank low in international assessments

  13. Good Times End I • Boom ended in 2013 • Recent economic performance in LA has been poor • Growth fell sharply in 2014 to just 1.1% -- barely above region’s rate of population growth of 1.0% • Will continue at a similar or even lower rate in 2015 • Investment also declined in 2014 and will likely continue to do so in 2015 • Poverty ratios have stagnated at 2012 levels • No hard data, but income distribution likely worse • Unemployment has remained low, but the proportion of the working-age population with jobs fell in 2014

  14. Good Times End II

  15. Good Times End III • Significant regional differences • Sharp slowdown is essentially a phenomenon in South America which grew by 0.6% in 2014 compared with 2.5% in Mexico and the Central America • Venezuela started a severe recession in 2014 which will deepen in 2015 • The two largest South American countries Argentina and Brazil will also experience moderate recessions in 2015 • Most other South American countries have continued to grow but • Experienced a slowdown in 2014 (Chile, Ecuador, Peru, Uruguay), or • Are experiencing one in 2015 (Colombia).

  16. Good Times End IV • Expectations are Bolivia and Paraguay will continue to grow at 4.0% or more in 2015. • In the northern part of the region Mexico will grow but at only 2.1% in 2014 and projected 3.0% in 2015 • Continues the mediocre pattern for Mexico – grew at a rate of 2.6% between 2004 and 2013, the second lowest in Latin America • Central America (with exception of El Salvador and Honduras) and Dominican Republic will continue to outperform • Although some strengths remain, region is less able than it was in 2008 and 2009 to counteract adverse external shocks such as • the decline in commodity prices, or • changes in U.S. monetary policy

  17. Good Times End VI • Major strength of region continues to be low external debt ratios • Although started to increase • Favorable net debt position • gives countries access to private capital markets, and • at a minimum permits most monetary authorizes to avoid contractionary policies when managing the current shocks • However because of • rising external imbalances (particularly deficit in the current account) and • in some cases rising inflation, • Room for monetary authorities to maneuver is more limited than in 2008-09 • Some – notably Brazil have been forced to raise interest rates to counteract rising inflation

  18. Good Times End V • In addition, higher government spending in recent years has constrained Latin America's ability to use fiscal policy to support growth in economies hit by declining international demand • On average region has ceased to run the primary fiscal surplus (incomes minus spending before interest payments) that it enjoyed before the crisis. • The greatest risk comes from the current account of the balance of payments. • Despite very favorable terms of trade (export prices relative to import prices) the region has been running deficits on its current account – largely exports minus imports. • Means countries have been spending more than they have been producing

  19. Good Times End VII • The improved terms of trade (export prices) was equivalent to around 7% of GDP in 2011-2013 • However region not only spent all of these gains it still ran a current account deficit. • Means the region in fact overspent the commodity boom. • Recent depreciations of many of the region’s currencies will eventually help reduce current account deficits (by making imports more profitable and imports more expensive). • But in the short term improvements in the current account will come primarily from lower imports, the result of the economic slowdown.

  20. Outside Influence I • Change in Latin America’s fortunes results in large part from reversal of the benevolent external conditions that fostered the boom. • Excellent performance from 2004 until middle of 2008 reflected extraordinary coincidence of four positive external factors: • Rapid international trade • Booming commodity prices • Ample access to external financing, and • Migration opportunities, and the growing remittances that migrants sent home.

  21. Outside Influence II • Two of these positive factors • Migration opportunities and, • Rapid world trade expansion • Have disappeared, probably permanently as a result of the financial crisis in advanced countries • Migration opportunities to the U.S. are more limited than before the crisis and • High unemployment in Spain has prompted many South American migrants to return home. • Remittances which help prop up demand in recipient countries, have recovered but are sill below the 2008 peak

  22. Outside Influence III • Similarly world trade experienced the worst peacetime contraction in history after the 2008-09 crisis • Although trade swiftly recovered since 2011, it has settled in at a slow rate of growth • Export volumes have increased only • 3.0% a year since 2007 – worst performance since WWII • Fraction of the 7.3% annual growth rate between 1986 and 2007 • Commodity price boom took off in 2004 • Although rise interrupted by the sharp contraction in international trade, recovery very fast.

  23. Outside Influence IV • The benefits of the positive terms of trade were particularly strong for energy and mineral-exporting countries in following order: • Venezuela, Chile, Bolivia, Peru, Colombia, and Ecuador • Followed by major agricultural exporters • Argentina and Brazil.. • In contrast, oil importing countries were hurt • Notably those in Central America and the Caribbean • When commodity prices started to fall in 2012 and oil prices collapsed in the second half of 2014 fortunes were reversed

  24. Outside Influence V • Economic slowdown in China a major reason for the commodity implosion. • Not clear whether this is a short- or long-term phenomenon. • However research has shown that real commodity prices have followed long-term cycles since the late 19th century. • If this pattern continues, the world is at the beginning of a long period of weakening commodity prices. • Therefore of the four conditions that fed the 2004 to mid-2008 boom only one remains in place –good access to external financing.

  25. Outside Influence VI With regard to finance • The fall-out from the Lehman collapse essentially shut down financing from private capital markets, but for only a year • Latin American access to international capital markets rebounded sharply after that. • Annual bond issues by Latin America have almost tripled to $9.6 billion a month in 2010-14 compared with $3.5 billion in 2004-07 • And costs of financing have remained low for countries that issued bonds in international capital markets. • Favorable financing climate is result of • low debt ratios, and • the large amount of liquidity (cash) floating around world as result of expansionary monetary polices of FED and ECB

  26. Outside Influence VII • Favorable LA borrowing has continued despite • Euro crisis of 2011-12, • The U.S. Federal Reserve’s gradual tapering of its bond purchases and even the • Commodity shocks of 2014 • Moreover the few countries that lack access to global private capital markets • Argentina, Ecuador and Venezuela • Have had ample financing from China • Things may change quickly but for now conditions remain favorable.

  27. Going Forward I Lessons: • Latin America cannot rely solely on favorable external conditions to propel economic growth in the near future • Must built up favorable conditions on its own. • A need for reforms • Reforms must go beyond the traditional market approaches that were in fashion in the 1980s and 1990s • Fact is market reforms have not delivered strong economic growth • GDP growth during 1991-2014 after market reforms was 3.2% per year compared with 5.5% during era of more state intervention 1946-1980 • Poor productivity has hampered economic performance, and growth that has occurred has been unstable.

  28. Going Forward II • Basic explanation for this mediocre long-term economic performance is • A lack of adequate attention to upgrading technology in the production sector • Strong deindustrialization, and • The fact that the region has specialized in goods (notably commodities) that offer limited opportunities for diversification and improvements in product quality • This has been reinforced by growing trade with China which almost entirely imports natural-resource-based goods from Latin America • The net effect of relying on traditional export opportunities is a wider technology gap • with the dynamic Asian countries, and • leading commodity producers such as Australia, Canada and Finland

  29. Going Forward III • Essential region • Invest in diversifying its production structure, and • place technological change at the center of long-run development strategies • Diversify trade with China away from commodities • The need to focus on new technology to increase competitiveness is critical given prospects of weak growth in world trade. • Increased exports not only strategy region should follow • Reduced poverty and a larger middle class provide opportunities for domestic markets as well

  30. Going Forward IV • Best way to develop richer domestic markets is through regional integration. • Woill require overcoming significant political divisions that have blocked the advance of regional integration over the last decade • In macroeconomic terms most important condition for more dynamic production diversitiation is more competitive and less volatile exchange rate3s • Thjis should be part of a stronger shift towards macroeconomic policies to lean against booms and dgrowth slowdowns and reeuce growth volatility tht characterized the past quarter century

  31. Going Forward V • Region also needs to make major advances in two other areas: • Quality of education and • Infrastructure investment • Without better education, bottlenecks in the supply of well-trained workers will hold back technological advancement the region needs. • In turn the weak infrastructure requires significantly higher investment in highways, ports and airpotrs – at least doubling current investment levels • Reform agenda must be put in place • Not a question of market reforms but of a better mix between states and markets

More Related