610 likes | 626 Views
Explore data from two surveys conducted in 2005 by Social Sciences Research Centre at the University of Hong Kong. Discover participation rates, risk factors, gambling behavior, and prevalence of problem gambling in Hong Kong. Gain insights into youth gambling trends, media influence, and preventive measures for addressing gambling-related problems.
E N D
Hong Kong People’s Participation in Gambling Activities (2005) Prepared for Home Affairs Bureau by Social Sciences Research Centre The University of Hong Kong
The Survey • Population Survey • Survey Period: March to April 2005 • Survey Coverage: Persons aged 15-64 in all domestic households in Hong Kong (excluding domestic helpers) • Sample Size: 2093 • Survey Method: Telephone interviews • Response Rate: 74.7% or 32.4% (including non-contacts) • Margin of Error of Key Statistics: +/-2.1% at 95% confidence level
The Survey • Youth Survey • Survey Period: April to May 2005 • Survey Coverage: 48 classes from 14 secondary schools, 23 classes from VTC • Sample Size: 2095 • Survey Method: Self-administered questionnaires
Participation in gambling activities Base: N=2093
Gambling risk Base: n=1328 Base: n=1188 Note: 63.7% of respondents had children
Age of first gambling experience for gamblers Base: n=1679
Who invited/persuaded to participate in first gambling Base: n=1720
Reasons for participating in first gambling Base: n=1865
Income spent on betting Base: n=1543
Awareness of the preventive and remedial measures to address gambling related problems Base: N=2093
Type of measures Base: n=850
Problem & Pathological gambling • 2.2% of respondents indicated that they had experienced five or more of the problems covered by the DSM-IV and can be classified as “probable pathological gamblers” • 3.1% of respondents indicated that they had experienced three or four of the problems covered by the DSM-IV and can be classified as “probable problem gamblers” • Most of the identified “probable pathological gamblers” said they experienced the DSM-IV problems when betting on Horse Racing, Football Betting, Casino (Macau) and Social Gambling Note: DSM-IV is a clinical tool, not a screening tool
Problem & Pathological gambling • 1.1% of respondents could be classified as pathological gamblers by Dr Leung’s screen • 3.2% of respondents could be classified as problem gamblers by Dr Leung’s screen
Participation in gambling activities (last year) compared with 2001
Participation in gambling activities (last year) compared with 2001
Amount spent on gambling activities (per month) * More than 30% of respondents (Mark in Red) 20% - 30% of respondents (Mark in Blue)
Age of first gambling experience for gamblers Base: n=329
Who invited/persuaded to participate in first gambling Base: n=661
Reasons for participating in first gambling Base: n=659
Reasons for continuing to gamble Base: n=565
Age of first football betting experience for soccer gamblers Base: n=68
Channels to place the bet of first football betting Base: n=113
Who invited/persuaded to participate in first football betting Base: n=115
Reasons for participating in first football betting Base: n=114
Reasons for continuing to gamble on football game Base: n=114
Channels to place the bet * * More than 50% of respondents (Mark in Red) 20% - 50% of respondents (Mark in Blue)
Respondents’ attitude towards gambling Base: aged 12 – 13 (355) / aged 14 – 15 (408) / aged 16 – 17 (269) / aged 18 – 19 (162)
Media influence on gambling Media coverage of different gambling activities - Base: aged 12 – 13 (583) / aged 14 – 15 (647) / aged 16 – 17 (486) / aged 18 – 19 (223)
Media influence on gambling Media coverage of different gambling activities - Base: aged 12 – 13 (583) / aged 14 – 15 (647) / aged 16 – 17 (486) / aged 18 – 19 (223)
Media influence on gambling Media coverage of different gambling activities - Base: aged 12 – 13 (583) / aged 14 – 15 (647) / aged 16 – 17 (486) / aged 18 – 19 (223)
Media influence on gambling HKJC’s promotions (e.g. carnivals, Open Day, etc.) on different kinds of different gambling activities - Base: aged 12 – 13 (583) / aged 14 – 15 (647) / aged 16 – 17 (486) / aged 18 – 19 (223)
Media influence on gambling HKJC’s promotions (e.g. carnivals, Open Day etc.) on different kinds of different gambling activities - Base: aged 12 – 13 (583) / aged 14 – 15 (647) / aged 16 – 17 (486) / aged 18 – 19 (223)
Problem & Pathological gambling(Students aged 12-19 of secondary schools only) • 1.3% of respondents indicated that they had experienced five or more of the problems covered by the DSM-IV and can be classified as “probable pathological gamblers” • 1.3% of respondents indicated that they had experienced three or four of the problems covered by the DSM-IV and can be classified as “probable problem gamblers” • Most of the identified “probable pathological gamblers” said they experienced the DSM-IV problems when betting on Mark Six, Football Betting, Social Gambling and cussec Note: DSM-IV is a clinical tool, not a screening tool
Problem & Pathological gambling(secondary schools + VTC) • 1.3% of respondents could be classified as pathological gamblers by Dr Leung’s screen • 0.8% of respondents could be classified as problem gamblers by Dr Leung’s screen
Awareness of preventive and remedial measures to address gambling related problems Base: n=2019
Type of measures Base: n=790
Family’s reactions to participation in gambling activities Base: n=679 (who had participated in any gambling activities within last year)
Participation in gambling activities as compared with 2001 – Mark Six (secondary schools only) Base: 2005 survey Aged 12-13 (284) / Aged 14-15 (514) / Aged 16-17 (465) / Aged 18-19 (233) 2001 survey Aged 12-13 (271) / Aged 14-15 (825) / Aged 16-17 (754) / Aged 18-19 (150)
Participation in gambling activities as compared with 2001 – Horse Racing (HKJC) (secondary schools only) Base: 2005 survey Aged 12-13 (284) / Aged 14-15 (514) / Aged 16-17 (465) / Aged 18-19 (233) 2001 survey Aged 12-13 (271) / Aged 14-15 (825) / Aged 16-17 (754) / Aged 18-19 (150)
Participation in gambling activities as compared with 2001 – Football Betting (secondary schools only) Base: 2005 survey Aged 12-13 (284) / Aged 14-15 (514) / Aged 16-17 (465) / Aged 18-19 (233) 2001 survey Aged 12-13 (271) / Aged 14-15 (825) / Aged 16-17 (754) / Aged 18-19 (150)
Participation in gambling activities as compared with 2001 – Social Gambling (secondary schools only) Base: 2005 survey Aged 12-13 (284) / Aged 14-15 (514) / Aged 16-17 (465) / Aged 18-19 (233) 2001 survey Aged 12-13 (271) / Aged 14-15 (825) / Aged 16-17 (754) / Aged 18-19 (150)
Amount spent on gambling as compared with 2001 (underage secondary school students only)