290 likes | 480 Views
Cladistics. Phylogeny. Macroevolution & Phylogeny. – hypothesized genealogy traced back to the last common ancestor ( i.e ., the most recent) through hierarchical, dichotomous branching. Phylogenetic tree.
E N D
Cladistics Phylogeny
Macroevolution & Phylogeny – hypothesized genealogy traced back to the last common ancestor (i.e., the most recent) through hierarchical, dichotomous branching Phylogenetic tree Cladistics – the principles that guide the production of phylogenetic trees, a.k.a., cladograms
Macroevolution & Phylogeny Phylogenetic tree, phylogeny, or cladogram Node – branch point, speciation event
Macroevolution & Phylogeny Phylogenetic tree, phylogeny, or cladogram Lineage or clade – an entire branch
Macroevolution & Phylogeny Phylogenetic tree, phylogeny, or cladogram A clade is a monophyletic group, i.e., an ancestral species and all of its descendents
Macroevolution & Phylogeny Phylogenetic tree, phylogeny, or cladogram A paraphyletic group consists of an ancestor and some of its descendents
Macroevolution & Phylogeny How are phylogenetic trees constructed?
Macroevolution & Phylogeny The fossil record is especially valuable, and the only option for many extinct taxa
Macroevolution & Phylogeny However, we almost never have a continuous record from one species to the next
Macroevolution & Phylogeny Cladistic principles allow us to construct hypothesized phylogenetic trees
Cladistic Analysis Fossils provide morphological data for extinct species, whereas comparisons of multiple types of traits – including molecular – do so for extant species
Cladistic Analysis Similar characters (e.g., morphological, behavioral, molecular, etc. traits or features) suggest relatedness… Wasps [Hymenoptera]
Cladistic Analysis But, not all similarity derives from common ancestry! Mantisfly [Neuroptera] Convergent evolution can produce superficially similar traits that lack homology with one another
Cladistic Analysis Homologouscharacters share common ancestry Lack of similarity among taxa results from divergence
Cladistic Analysis Analogouscharacters do not share common ancestry Similarity among taxa results from convergence
Cladistic Analysis As a general rule, the more homologous characters shared by two species, the more closely they are related Sequences of DNA & RNA (nucleotides) and proteins (amino acids) are used as characters; as a general rule, the more recently two species shared a common ancestor, the more similar their sequences
Cladistic Analysis Each nucleotide can be treated as a character Character changes (mutations) from the ancestral to the derived state include: Substitutions …AGCTCTAGG… …AGCTATAGG… Insertions …AGCTCTAGG… Mutations …AGCTGATCTAGG… Deletions …AGCTCTAGG… …AGCTCTAGG…
Cladistic Analysis Shared Primitive Characters (ancestral) Analogies All similar characters Homologies Shared Derived Characters(unique to a clade) The sequence of branching in a cladogram then represents the sequence in which evolutionary novelties (shared derived characters) evolved
Cladistic Analysis Ingroup vs. Outgroup Ingroup = the group whose relationships we are trying to resolve Fig. 25.11
Cladistic Analysis Ingroup vs. Outgroup Outgroup = a species (or group) known to have an older most recent common ancestor with the ingroup than the ingroup’s most recent common ancestor Fig. 25.11
Cladistic Analysis Ingroup vs. Outgroup An outgroup helps identify shared ancestral and shared derived characters (unique to a clade) Fig. 25.11
Cladistic Analysis Parsimony & Occam’s Razor The most parsimonious tree is the one that requires the fewest evolutionary events (appearance of shared derived characters) Fig. 25.11
Cladistic Analysis Parsimony & Occam’s Razor On this most parsimonious cladogram, each key character originated (evolved) once Fig. 25.11
Cladistic Analysis An example… Outgroup Ingroup See Fig. 25.15 for another example
Cladistic Analysis An example… Outgroup Ingroup Create potential topologies for the tree See Fig. 25.15 for another example
Cladistic Analysis An example… Outgroup Ingroup Create potential topologies for the tree Map the characters onto the trees See Fig. 25.15 for another example Choose the most parsimonious tree